Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

 

Will Congressman Nunes Be Removed From Committee?: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/nunes-white-house-source-surveillance_us_58d92967e4b02a2eaab61087?

My Take: This is one of those stories where I’m not sure what’s political and what’s real… something that’s an increasing trend in contemporary Washington D.C. I feel like this story is still in flux, and I don’t want to make any calls or assertions quite yet, so let’s just revisit it when we have more to say. In the meantime, this is a good story to read up on and keep on your radar.

Democrats Delay Neil Gorsuch Vote: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/democrats-delay-vote-supreme-court-nominee-neil-gorsuch-n738901

My Take: I said this last week, and I don’t mean to be redundant, but Neil Gorsuch is more-than-qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice. Highly educated, extremely fair, moderate in his politics, Gorsuch is a slam dunk, and if I were the Democrats, I’d choose a hill to die on far, far away from this man, because it’s going to blow up in their face.

I’m of the mind that what happened to Merrick Garland was profoundly unfair, even if the delay was a tactic originally devised by none other than Joe Biden. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, in a way. But I wouldn’t have played it like that. Garland should be on the bench. I totally get it.

But Garland isn’t on the bench, and we continue to have a SCOTUS vacancy. Are we just never going to put someone in ever again? Say what you will about Trump -- there’s obviously a ton to say -- but picking Garland was incredibly shrewd. There’s simply no real reason to oppose him other than politics. Everyone knows that, which is why I think he gets through, ultimately.

Democrats More Burned by Polling Than Initially Thought: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/democrats-trump-polling-236560

My Take: This is an interesting story, because it basically suggests that Democrats didn’t only misuse polling, or get bad numbers, but that their numbers were catastrophically off because they missed the entire white rural vote. Like, the whole damn thing. How embarrassing.

The story brings up something I forgot happened: the Kentucky gubernatorial race between Jack Conway (D) and Matt Bevin (R). Final polling aggregation had Conway winning by 3; Bevin won by 9. A 12 point miss, three or four times the margin of error. I totally forgot that happened, because I was so focused on the 2015 British polls that were wrong, as well as the disastrously wrong Brexit polling. Many canaries in the coalmine, as it were.

Anyway, give this one a read. It’s interesting. I’ll leave you with this, on this story: I have a strange feeling we’re going to be having this conversation again with Marine Le Pen. The Shy Voter is as real as the day is long. The evidence is everywhere. The people are starting to speak very loudly, indeed.

Jared Kushner Gets a Tsar Job: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-taps-kushner-to-lead-a-swat-team-to-fix-government-with-business-ideas/2017/03/26/9714a8b6-1254-11e7-ada0-1489b735b3a3_story.html?utm_term=.18bada44f246

My Take: I don’t know much about Jared Kushner, and obviously, his cozy position in relation to the president stinks of nepotism. But the man was a successful executive and real estate mogul in his own right, and I actually like the idea he’s now heading, bringing innovative, non-political solutions to Washington, solutions that politicians are all too eager to ignore.

This is going to be a wait-and-see sort of thing, but what I like about Kushner in this role isn’t only that he’s experienced, but that he’s young. He seems like he’ll be able to seduce the requisite personnel necessary to jump on the challenges laid before him.

Either way, this is the kind of nimble, innovative government I like to see, run by establishment outsiders with no real notion of how things “were” done or “should be” done. People say government shouldn’t be run like a business. My continued response to that is, “why not?” Of course there’s not 100% crossover, but there’s more than 0%. Far more. A little business acumen will go a long way in our swampy capital city.

Justice Department Grants Withheld From Sanctuary Cities: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/325943-sessions-says-grants-to-be-withheld-from-sanctuary-cities

My Take: It’s worth noting that on issues of illegal immigration, I’m very much a Republican. I think the very existence of Sanctuary Cities is an insult to the rule of law and to the ideals of justice, and I think the federal government should use every tool in its arsenal to twist the arms of these cities until they see the light of day.

I’m not the world’s biggest Jeff Sessions fan, but I like this initiative at first blush, and I think it should be ramped-up across the administration, and across government. How anyone can think that it’s okay for cities to shield those who don’t belong here (with a small fraction of those people committing felonies on American citizens and legal immigrants) is beyond me.

I’m moderate in many ways. I even think that granting legal status to many of the illegal immigrants currently here is probably the right way forward (with no guaranteed citizenship, no right to vote, and all the pressures of paying taxes and otherwise paying into the system). But when it comes to the rule of law, we must be united across the country. The idea of sanctuary cities reeks of nullification, and I don’t like it one bit.

Huma Abedin Going Back to Anthony Weiner?: http://nypost.com/2017/03/25/huma-abedin-is-giving-marriage-with-anthony-weiner-another-try/

My Take: Why, Huma, why?!

I’ve said this about her in the past, and I’ll say it again. Huma Abedin is a smart, educated, experienced, strikingly beautiful woman who has amazing connections, obvious work ethic, and a tendency towards finding success. She is arguably the closest confidant of arguably the most powerful woman in the world, a woman who has an outside chance of running for president again, and an inside chance of being the Mayor of New York City, a position some call the second most powerful elected post in America.

She was embarrassed, time and time and time again, by her piece of shit, selfish, scummy, disgusting husband. I know they have a child. I’m sure they look back fondly on their history. But the man is a disgrace, and she owes it to herself to get out. There are men that would fall all over themselves to treat her right. It’s just so sad to see, and it strikes me as so antithetical to the strong, intelligent, independent vibe she puts out.

I don’t know either of these people from a hole in the wall, but I do know this: I feel bad for Huma Abedin, and I loathe Anthony Weiner.

The New York Times’ New List of Offensive Terms: http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/26/nyt-reporters-create-a-list-of-racial-terms-they-find-offensive/

My Take: Read this at your own risk. I personally feel dumber after having consumed it.

Elon Musk and the AI Apocalypse: http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/03/elon-musk-billion-dollar-crusade-to-stop-ai-space-x

Fantastic (and fascinating) read.

Comments

Anonymous

I genuinely want to know: What actually does someone feel they're accomplishing by saying "I'm offended" other than displaying your remarkable mental weakness?

Anonymous

I know you warned me, Colin, but that list of Offensive Terms hurt my brain

RoughSlpr

I would definitely have to disagree with the notion of a government being run like a business. Of course there should be fiscal responsibility similar to any business but businesses are beholden to their shareholders whereas the government(especially the Federal government) is responsible for every citizen in the country. It's generally okay for a business to have a plan that includes laying workers off. The government equivalent of that can cost lives but end up being mostly detrimental to the people as a whole.

Matthew Compton

Nothing about that internet privacy bill? That seems like big news.

ChristianLikeTheReligion

Like you Colin I left the Democratic Party after the DNC colluded with Clinton's campaign and it doesn't surprise me in the least of the terrible projections they've gotten from rural white places. Having lived the migrant life, farmers are hardworking people that live day by day working hard and living their life. Democrats really need to get their shit together and get away from identity politics in order to really enamor more people throughout different demographics. I also agree that Democrats aren't doing themselves any favors from delaying Neil Gorsuch's position as a Supreme Court Justice. It was unfair for Garland and it is unfair for Gorsuch. I have the impression that Jared Kushner is as liberal as his wife so I don't know exactly how to interpret this. It certainly is a wait-and-see situation. Now, that list is just asinine. Though, the only thing I can agree with on that list of "offensive terms" is "person of color" because that is exactly the same as "colored person". The rest is stupid and gave me a headache, and this is coming from an ethnic American who was raised by immigrants, legal ones at that.

Anonymous

I agree, the immigration situation is a problem. There are many sides to it. However, you saying "no right to vote, and all the pressures of paying taxes and otherwise paying into the system" is counter to your twitter handle. I agree they need to pay taxes. Put simply, they use the services from the government. Would work visas be adequate, or similar to citizens of U.S. territories like Puerto Rico? I think the U.S. needs to make hard working immigrants legal citizens, as long as they don't commit violent crimes.

Anonymous

How are so many, obviously hyper liberal, people ok with delaying the appointment? They were astounded at the Republicans when Obama had his shot and now they do the same thing. This appointment is one of the very few thing Trump has gotten right. Let's come together a little.

Anonymous

Thoughtful and well said as always.

Anonymous

I'll offer a counter opinion to the NYT "offensive terms" thing, and the first two comments made here. This whole issue annoys me because I think, like many issues, liberals and conservatives alike find the worst examples of the other side and use them to ascribe qualities to wide swaths of people. I know that, typically, conservatives point to liberals as the offenders of "political correctness." I think it's hot air. (I identify as a liberal person, with fondness for some libertarian tenets.) I can't speak for anyone else, so obviously only speak for myself here. I'll use a term that was mentioned in the Daily Caller article: "colored people." I don't use this term, and I definitely notice it when other people say it, and it's not because it "offends" me; it's because I think it's stupid. The NYT's reasoning given, as stated in the Caller article, is just sensible. The NYT is right. Why is everybody else colored people? Just call them black, or brown, or Asian, etc. Those terms are widely accepted as fine because they get the point across. When I hear someone say "colored people" all I think is that person is afraid to say "black people." I realize this isn't the biggest issue in the world, but the reality of life is that we don't just deal with the biggest issues. We deal with all of them.

Anonymous

Hello Colin, would love to her your (And fellow Last Stander's) thoughts on this (Puerto Rico Statehood): <a href="https://youtu.be/9KzWrrO7vqc" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/9KzWrrO7vqc</a>

Evan Bederman

Great thoughts, but I do have to push back on the Huma Abedin story. I personally despise the woman, who's pretty wildly anti-Zionist and whose family's journal spewed some pretty terrible stuff. I personally hope her political career died with the Clinton campaign, as any position she's in spells bad news for Jews imo.

Anonymous

I'm glad Colin mentions a wait and see attitude. I feel that many people on all sides of issues are increasingly becoming prone to make quick judgements and then taking a hard stand. These stands result in stagnation especially when policy is the topic, a good bill for one side (bad bill for the other) cannot be improved for the benefit of all if no one is willing to explore ideas. ( Sorry if this isn't well worded I want to express my ideas well and as a novice to difficult issues I'll make many mistakes I'm sure.)

Anonymous

Man, that last article was amazing. I certainly fall in on the Musk side of the argument. Automation and A.I terrify me, and humanity seems to be diving head first into them without properly considering the consequences.

Anonymous

Colin you keep mentioning how the Brexit polling was disastrous, but it really wasn't. Leave was ahead through much of June and on the final day the polls were neck and neck, with only a .5% lead for Remain. That's a toss up, and a 52-48 victory is absolutely not indicative of the polls getting it disastrously wrong. <a href="http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/uk-european-union-referendum" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/uk-european-union-referendum</a>

Anonymous

I made mistake and read the list of new offensive words; I am sure I lost some IQ points.

Mike Smith

I completely (and respectfully) disagree with you Colin that Garland deserves to be on SCOTUS. By filling Scalia's seat, he would have flipped the Court from a conservative majority to a liberal majority (even if you believe he's relatively moderate (I don't), he's no Scalia). Republicans had a duty to the voters who put them in office to do everything in their power to block Garland. Mitch McConnell made a political calculation that they could hold open the seat for one year and that Trump would win. It paid off in a big way. This is what the Republicans were elected to do. Merrick Garland had no right to a seat on the Court without the Senate's consent. That is what the Constitution says. It was completely within the prerogative of the Senate to withhold consent. Many people forget, but the Democrats denied Chief Justice Roberts a hearing when he was first nominated to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals by Bush 41. But, as a lawyer, I am probably more tuned into these issues. Ed Whelan (a former Scalia law clerk) of National Review has an excellent series of blog posts on this subject. Curious as to your response to my position given the check the Senate is given on the President's nominating power in the Constitution. I strongly feel that if the shoe were on the other foot (say, for example, it was Ginsburg who died, a Republican was President, and the Democrats controlled the Senate) the Democrats would have done the exact same thing.

Anonymous

I think it started out as people wanting to say the N word and other people being upset about not being able to say it, then other people started to pick terms only they could use, and on and on, until it's devolved into people virtue signaling. Someone saying "I think it might be a bit offensive if you say this!" makes a lot of people think "wow they're so sensitive!" or at least it does in their own minds. It just keeps degenerating and PC culture is becoming mainstream culture, and it's just building counter cultures and opposition to other things that there might not have been without the constant policing.

Anonymous

I am sorry to add in something off topic, but can you tell me how you insert line breaks into your comment? Or maybe link somewhere that can tell me? I can't seem to get the hang of it. Thank you for your time and I apologize for interrupting this comment thread for my own, nefarious purposes.

Anonymous

I'm on the Nunes side of the first story. I know your withholding judgement but I feel like the whole Russian interference thing is just a meme that was created by the democrats during their convention that has gone on way too long. Even if it was Russia, which I don't personally believe, but I know a lot of smart people do, they didn't write the emails that was all the DNC.

Rick Rodriguez

That's the problem unfortunately. Both sides are more concerned with getting revenge for anything they didn't like about a previous administration, rather than actually trying to move the needle on progress. Dems are doing it with SCOTUS. Republicans are doing it with healthcare, more concerned with repealing anything Obama did than moving forward.

Anonymous

Honestly as long as the Russian investigation stays in the court of the House Intelligence Committee I don't expect we will really being getting much new information. They have a terrible track record.

Anonymous

I think the term "people of color" is too similar to "colored people" and I know some black people that do lot like the term. "Colored people" is a call back to segregation. As is the case with the rebel flag to slavery. I'm not afraid to say "black people." I have met several black people that are not African-American. I have a friend with Jamaican heritage. Same can be said for Haitians or people from the Dominican Republic.

Anonymous

Hey Colin, Not sure if you already do this, but would love the news bursts to be organized from what you think is most to least pressing. I know it sounds picky as hell, but you put up a lot of info and articles (not complaining), and I definitely want to at least read up on the ones you, in your mind, think are the most important. Sometimes I just can't get through it all

Stephen Fontana

Hey Colin, Re: SCOTUS. I think you are way off on this one. If the devs didn't lose as many seats as they did I may tend to agree with your assessment, but Gorsich has been said to have a similar voting record as Scalia. "“Judge Gorsuch has a record of ruling in a way that does not reflect Colorado values on reproductive rights. This is a pro-choice state that supports the constitutional right to abortion enshrined in Roe v. Wade and the right to privacy enshrined in Griswold v. Connecticut — beliefs that are contradicted in Judge Gorsuch’s ruling in Hobby Lobby and Little Sisters,” Karen Middleton, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado, said in a statement. “Colorado has a long, bipartisan history of supporting reproductive rights. Judge Gorsuch does not reflect the will of our state or the constitutional rights of American women and we would oppose his nomination,” she said. <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/2017/01/30/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-donald-trump/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://www.denverpost.com/2017/01/30/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-donald-trump/</a> That being said, if the Dems don't fight now then how can you expect them to be be able to rally the party come 2018? "Hey you better vote now because now you have a SCOTUS that will overturn gay marriage, abortion rights, etc. " If that happens you will have a Democratic base that will basically say "fuck you. You could have fought to keep him out and rolled over just like 95% of Trump's cabinet."

Anonymous

While I'm of the notion that Gorsuch should not be withheld from sitting on the court, to make the claim that Garland and Gorsuch are in the same situation is false. I don't like the state of the Supreme Court and how it has stooped to being a partisan courtship, but President Obama went out of his way to find a middle of the isle candidate who had won praise from both sides of the spectrum (a courtesy he did not need to extend), and was STILL met with obstructionism. Gorsuch on the other hand is fairly standard conservative based on his family background, education, and judicial experience. That being said, maintaining that obstruction is no good for the democracy therefore I would like to see the democrats just white knuckle there way through his appointment.

Russell Garrett

Fuck, reading that offensive term list made my IQ drop. I'm certain of it.

Stephen J Seidler

Regarding the Gorsuch nomination, I'm sure it will go through one way or the other, yet I find myself not quite willing to see Democrats just roll over on it. What happened with Merrick Garland was unprecedented and, to me, was the last in a series of uniquely disrespectful actions by Republicans against President Obama going back to Birtherism, which is something I will never forget and not soon forgive. President Trump would have a much better chance of enacting policies if he followed the wisdom of catching more flies with honey than vinegar. Instead, he chooses to be bombastic, rub his opponents noses in his election win, and believes he can govern simply through threats, insults, and personality. The current Republican party admires this and, if anything, sees negotiation and statesmanship as signs of "weakness". Perhaps Democrats should take the high ground with Gorsuch; after all, even in the worst case scenario he's not likely to be any worse for Liberalism than was Scalia. But doing so will not garner Democrats any respect or future consideration from Republicans, who currently only respect unilateral force as a means to achieve goals. Keep up the great work, Colin....oh and be sure to let us know when the rest of that camera equipment comes in so I can borrow it for my streaming rig ;)

Anonymous

I honestly doubt Abedin actually cares about Weiner. Their relationship probably has more to do with connections and strategy than anything else. He's clearly a sick fuck, and she's smart enough to know it. Which, to me, implies some things about her character.

Anonymous

Whenever I see that someone is willing to do/enable/excuse completely immoral things in order to further their own cause, I immediately doubt that person's devotion to bettering society. It speaks to me of an ideological, zealous, "ends justify the means" mindset that is really fucking toxic and dangerous. Same thing with blocking the Merrick appointment. And delaying Gorsuch. And Obama lying to get Obamacare through. And....oh god there are so many things like this. American politics is a fucking shit show on both sides.

Christopher Lee

Well that Elon musk article about AI is fucking terrifying.

Jeremy Meyer

The first guy to do A.I. bigly is absolutely going to destroy his political enemies.

Timothy Monnig

I'd like to weigh in on the Democrats missing the boat on polling. In the wake of Brexit and the 2016 Presidential election, there's a tendency to rake pollsters over the coals, as the linked article reports. There were some viable excuses about why they had trouble getting a read on the rural vote, and I think there's an expressed desire to learn from those. And certainly the fact that Trump and Clinton both were inherently polarizing figures within their own party encouraged the meeker among us to keep their opinions to themselves, and particularly in the case of rural voters (of whom I know and love many), who feel disregarded, and they often are, by the amorphous "college educated elite" (although I went to college with plenty of morons, many who now have degrees). Tangent: I find it a little funny but mostly tragic how white rural voters, and Evangelicals in particular, have started to subscribe to their own form of identity politics and have picked up the banner of victimhood. Back on topic: All of these things being as they are, it's important to remember that polls don't exist in a vacuum, and they inform the same public that they represent, perhaps disproportionately so, given that the daily polls done by Gallop target around 1000 people (which as much as anything, speaks to the logistical challenge of getting accurate polling). However the results of these polls are trumpeted as truth, or even if it's offered even-handedly, we as the public take them as truth. If you were a Democrat who was wishy-washy about Clinton, but you thought she was going to win because you had 3 months of polls telling you she would, you might not be so inclined to show up to the polls on Super Tuesday, or you would spend your vote on a Third Party option or a write-in. If you are a Trump voter who can see the chips are down and seeing Clinton in the White House as a special version of Hell, then you are going to rally, because it's Super Tuesday, and shit just got real (or really, your a moderate Republican who values the Supreme Court enough to give this whack job a chance). Also, Democrats traditionally need to feel inspired to show up, and the Clinton enthusiasm gap murdered the down ticket prospects.

Timothy Monnig

Regarding my tangent in my previous post: The Atantic - White Evangelicals Believe They Face More Discrimination Than Muslims - <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/perceptions-discrimination-muslims-christians/519135/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/perceptions-discrimination-muslims-christians/519135/</a>

Caleb Greer

I've been thinking: with scientists considering the multiverse theory to explain scientific phenomena, such as unaccounted gravitation in the form of dark matter as far as i understand it, I wonder whether the idea of infinities in the realms of the universe and outside the universe has a concrete and final infinity, or will infinity just keep popping up forever. To explain: originally there was the universe that was infinite. Now there may presumably be an infinite amount of infinite universes (like "bubbles" as I've heard them termed) i.e. the multiverse theory. Does this idea keep branching out to where there are an infinite number of infinite infinite universes, and so on? Will it end at some point? It's a very curious and rather unanswerable topic but something to think about nonetheless. Infinity just keeps getting bigger, it seems.

Ryan Berry

Regarding Kushner: I'm very much excited to see where this goes, not only because of the concept (which I think is the right approach) but because of who is engaged. You have a right-winged leader engaging the vocal and powerful public who lean left. That's how the compromise and moderate action that truly benefits the taxpayer will surface. Regarding sanctuary cities: this issue just emphasizes the gap between the coastal elite and the rest of the country. What these cities are doing isn't noble, it's reckless. The government is beholden to its own people first and foremost; let the private, non-profit institutions worry about humanities. The responsibility of attaining an ideal society and eliminating hate and prejudice rests in the hands of the people, not the elected officials; thinking otherwise is just passing the buck so you don't feel responsible. Regarding AI: I think we are farther from this than either of these (very brilliant) people claim. AI will come at us slowly, and when it's here, it will be so slow and buggy that it is impractical to propagate. Think about the first computers: they were the size of buildings and could do simple calculations. Furthermore, as the AI learns more and more, it will slow itself down, so the idea that it will take over is a little over the top. There needs to be a big breakthrough on the CONCEPT of AI development before we can make any real strides, and it will probably come from the biomedical field, not the tech industry.

Jeremy Meyer

Re: Polling... Big picture. HC, awful as she was, only lost the 4 key swing states by 1%. Polling, when it's good, is only accurate +/- 3%. They should have listened to Slick Wilie, he felt white voters in his balls.

Ryan Berry

Where are you reading that a multiverse is an explanation for dark matter? I was always taught that it's the "negative" mass to the "positive" mass we see and feel (total Higgs mass of zero). All obviously theoretical.

Anonymous

The democrats missing the entire white rural vote is no less embarrassing than the republicans missing the entire african american vote.

Caleb Greer

<a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/03/140318-multiverse-inflation-big-bang-science-space/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/03/140318-multiverse-inflation-big-bang-science-space/</a> This article does some elaborating, but it suggests it as a potential explanation for the effects of dark energy, not dark matter, so i may have been confused on that point. However, i first heard about it i believe listening to a Neil Degrasse Tyson lecture on youtube from Washington University i think. I may be incorrect about him referring to dark matter, as he may have said dark energy (or that may be the wrong place I heard it), but i don't recall exactly.

Phil Crone

Your last point about "wanting" to vote is really what summed things up for me. People wanted to vote for Barack Obama, and they just didn't for Clinton. Colin says it a lot and I agree: we all misjudged how profoundly unlikable Hillary Clinton was.

Atlas522

100% agree with you. Reading some of these people talking about a "stolen seat" it reminds you how much the left thought Obama was a king. The Senate is a coequal branch of government and has every right to do what it did.

Phil Crone

I live in KY and that governor race was... interesting. I remember complaining to my wife once that if Jack Conway wasn't a jerk to everyone at a Red Cross gala we attended (my wife worked for the RC, we got in for free, I am by no means a rich man), I wouldn't know a damn thing about the guy other than he was the attorney general. Every ad was either Bevin or an attack ad on Bevin. We've actually had our own little microcosm of Trump's America here in that Bevin can do no right in the eyes of the media. He's done a handful of stuff that I do disagree with - there was recently a law passed stating that the governor's office can handpick successors to elected officials in the instance that the official resigns or dies, something my home base of Louisville sees as a direct attack. Overall though, the state is so broke that I'm not sure he can make things much worse regardless.

Phil Crone

Joshua - I think that's more of a "good faith" starting point. Essentially, what legal immigrants do on their path to citizenship. I work with a handful of people from India who are working on their citizenship, and this is the spot they are currently in. One of the big "duh" takeaways from working with that group - no one gets more angry about illegal immigration than legal immigrants. It's probably why Trump did better with the Hispanic vote than Romney did. And it makes sense b/c we've all experienced something similar... You know how traffic can back up b/c one lane is closed, and all the decent people wait their turn in the one lane, while the jerks drive as far as possible in the closed lane and shoot over last second? That's how I interpret their feelings. Not saying it's right or wrong, but that's what I relate it to.

Phil Crone

Missing? Or ignoring? Or, maybe most accurately, conceding?

Khalil Sadi

This Nunes thing seems a little too fishy to me. It's very confusing at the moment. You're right on letting it marinate for a moment in order to get a clearer picture, because right now it's extremely fuzzy. Neil Gorsuch is going to be cleared, there's no denying it. The problem is Democrats are really burned by the fact that Garland didn't even get a hearing, so they're trying to give Republicans a taste of their own medicine. I just don't think they should do it that way. There are other things they could be focusing on, but oh well... I've got family in Michigan, and some of them were pretty outspoken about Trump, but a lot of them were really shy about it. Within the confines of family, they'd talk about it openly, but they'd they wouldn't in public, because of all the shit he said. Democrats shouldn't have rested on their laurels when they saw those polls. Sad. Well, Kushner and everybody else in Trump's family is getting the special "insider Trump-a-roo" treatment. I don't know anything about him, other than he's Trump's son-in-law. I like the idea behind the "SWAT team," because lately it's about "Oh we're on one side, so fuck the other side!" Instead of actually working for the country and the people, it's become a shit-show. The problem is with Bannon nearby trying to destroy the government, I'm not so convinced about it. Yeah, they may say he has nothing to do with it, but I don't buy it. That Bannon guy, he's a smart cookie, and man, I don't like him one bit, lol. I live in California, and agree that there has to be a general rule with no sanctuary cities. I had to go through a lot of hoops to become a Green Card holder. It's hard, but doable. And you're right, the people who've been living here for a long time and have an excellent record should be granted a path to residence. But, I'm a little conflicted, since I don't like Trump and his buddies a whole lot... Although, we have to let the system work itself out. The courts have already blocked the travel bans twice, because they were unconstitutional. We can see it's already working. Lol. Who the heck knows why Huma keeps going back to him. All I can say is this: Hillary Clinton, don't run again. Run for NYC mayor, sure, but leave the entire country alone. Elon Musk is a very interesting dude, and I completely agree with him about the AI apocalypse. If people aren't careful, that shit could turn awry very quickly. Elon was interviewed on StarTalk, and Bill Nye completely laughed at his warning about AI, Neil DeGrasse Tyson was a little more moderate in his dismissal. I love Neil and Bill, they're great, but I do think there's a lot to be skeptical about AI. Anyways, fantastic as always, Colin! Have a fantastic day, y'all!

Anonymous

I found it disheartening when I heard my own hometown was a sanctuary city(borough). It's your atypical small town, USA, but over the last ten years, due to all the local farms, orchards, and vineyards, it's turned into little Mexico. The culture change of mainsteet is one thing, but the trash, the bombed out public housing, the crime, and graffiti is a whole other ball game. My town is in a primarily red county, but after former president obama allowed 250k "children" into the country, we got a lions share of them. We were once a shining gem of our state, but now we are just another slum. Those whom speak out are called racist, and the local paper fired all the conservative columnists for a "fresh look", so of course there is no difference in opinions except for Facebook. The Democratic Party is attempting to change our rural communities into urban centers, thus changing the voting demographics. I don't know about other towns, but I know it happened to mine. We are in the northeast, far away from the border, but illegal immigration has drastically affected us. This is either a warning or a wake up call.... this is happening now. I have friends in office in my town and don't want to throw shade on anyone in particular, that's why I wish to keep things anonymous. Sorry. Hope my tale helps.

BettyAnn Moriarty

I'm starting to dig in. Thanks, bud! 😉💞

OsmosisJones

Love the Elon Musk article! i have been reading up on transhumanism and all the developing technologies. Very interesting to say the least.