Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Hey All,

Let's get right into it today, shall we?

I hope you're all doing very well! -Colin

Trump Begins Dismantling Environmental Protections: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/donald-trump-obama-climate-change-policies-236570

My Take: This was inevitable. While I believe that global warming is real, and while I believe that it’s being heavily exacerbated by human activity, I also acknowledge how complicated this issue is, and how dealing with the problem must be balanced with economic realities. As callous as it sounds, the dude in West Virginia who can’t provide for his family because his coal mine was shut down doesn’t care about global warming. He cares about surviving, right now. And no matter what anyone says, there’s a legitimacy in the way that hypothetical man feels.

To combat global warming will require a Kyoto Protocol-like agreement between literally every major country, but it’s also fair to say that China and India, as an example, are right to be hesitant to get involved, strangle their economies, and hurt their prospects because western countries were busy polluting to their hearts’ content while they weren’t even able to build workable factories. Like I said, this issue is massively complex, incredibly complicated, and has very real implications, both for today and tomorrow. It’s geopolitical to the nth degree.

Here’s my stance: Green energy should continue to be a priority. Start building nuclear power plants (why are we so scared of them?), give massive tax breaks to those who are studying alternative forms of fuel, and really get down to the nitty-gritty of reducing our carbon footprint over the coming decades, not years. In the meantime, keep drilling and extracting fossil fuels, driving costs down for consumers and keeping people employed. There are economic realities that must be dealt with here. Pretending those realities don’t exist doesn’t make them go away.

I know it’s very sci-fi, but am I the only one who thinks that science will end up solving this problem in an unexpected way in, say, 50 years’ time? Atmosphere scrubbers, or blocking off portions of the Earth from receiving sunlight, or any of the other really fascinating shit I read about from time to time? I dunno. All I know is that the gray area in between hyper-environmentalism and overt destruction of our ecosystem is where we need to be.

Will Sally Yates Testify?: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/326151-white-house-says-it-wants-yates-to-testify

My Take: This is more “Russia! Russia! Russia!” stuff, and I have no idea what’s real and what’s false. Same as I said yesterday. Trump can be the Manchurian Candidate, or he can be completely innocent. I have no idea, and I don’t trust anything anyone says about Trump’s Russia connections, whether it’s the media talking or the administration.

I read about this shit everyday, and I can barely keep up. Just imagine how people working real jobs and going about their lives in Anytown, USA feel.

The agendas on both sides have become far too big. Far too real. Far too impenetrable. Never in my life would I have thought I’d see a POTUS with possible illicit connections to Russia, nor would have I ever thought I’d see a Democratic party that seems hell-bent on going to actual war with our old Cold War adversary. What the fuck is even going on anymore?

Broadband Privacy Rules in Jeopardy: http://www.theverge.com/2017/3/27/15073162/fcc-broadband-internet-privacy-rules-congress-vote

My Take: First of all, some folks were upset I didn’t include this yesterday. Honestly, I had only read about it briefly, and didn’t know much about it. So, here’s where we stand.

The Senate has already voted on removing FCC regulations regarding a person’s right to privacy in regard to their private data. The House will now have to vote, and then the President will have to sign the bill. So there are still two steps to stop this from happening.

The article explains why this is a bad thing, if you need more information, but it basically comes down to this: Telecoms would, in this new future, be able to take and bundle your data, whether it’s browsing history or whatever else, and sell it to whoever, with no protection. It goes even further than that, but that’s pretty much all you need to know in terms of why this is inherently nefarious and wrong-headed.

Better act quick!

Silence U: What Has Yale Become?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xK4MBzp5YwM&ab_channel=WeTheInternet

My Take: Watching this video actually made me livid. I can’t believe what’s happening to college campuses lately. This guy does a really fantastic job of explaining the issue, and noting how completely fucking insane it all is.

We need to reclaim academia for ideas and knowledge, not agendas and orthodoxy.

Storing Away Precious Cargo: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3197874/second-arctic-doomsday-vault-will-allow-the-worlds-precious-books-to-survive-armageddon/

My Take: I know folks aren’t crazy about The Sun, but I think this is an interesting story, nonetheless. Storing away what makes us human, and what makes our society tick, just in case something bad happens… well… that doesn’t seem like a terrible idea during times like these, does it?

Sean Spicer Fights Back: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/03/28/sean_spicer_vs_april_ryan_if_the_president_puts_russian_dressing_on_his_salad_you_say_its_a_connection.html

My Take: This is an interesting palate cleanser, because while I’m no fan of the Trump administration, and while I think Sean Spicer is clearly out of his depth as Press Secretary, I also think it’s clear that the mainstream media has a runaway agenda, and I think it’s good to reel it back in at times like these.

Comments

Anonymous

The Sean Spicer piece is extremely interesting. Hadn't seen that one in my feed yet, thanks

Steven Camilo

Thank you for continuing to suck that dick Colin - it is much appreciated. <3

Anonymous

I agree with the nuclear energy comment and wish we'd pursue some of the more efficient approaches, like thorium.

John Barton

Good point on the Green Energy. I do believe there needs to be more nuclear power since coal produces a heavy carbon footprint. The only reason I could see of why not to produce more nuclear energy would be people's worry of what happens if it melts down. As long as proper security and maintenance is done to all nuclear power plants and future ones, I'd say it would be much better for America's future.

Anonymous

The Sun is a vile rag Colin, just saying.

Atlas522

In regards to the environment piece, I think you hit the nail on the head Colin. Personally, I think green energy is great and should continue to be researched heavily. But honestly I don't think you can be serious about climate change and also be against the expansion of nuclear power. Cheap nuclear power could do so much to reduce our carbon emissions and it's just sitting there, ready for us to use it. I remember going to see Bill Nye give a talk while I was in college probably around four years ago and I lost a lot of respect for him when someone asked him about expanding nuclear power and he came out flatly against it. There are obviously many reasons to be careful about it, but historically it's much safer than coal power for instance. But I think when you get down to it a lot of the environmentalists will just never be ok with nuclear power and that is honestly a shame.

Andrew

When it comes to your opinion about the man in "anytown" USA in the "Trump Begins Dismantling Environmental Protections" story I couldn't agree more... I'm Canadian and we have similar situations here. I don't get celebrities, or rich politicians that preach about how bad coal is, how out of control global warming is, but don't emphasize with people that barely make ends meet, aren't rich like them and rely on their bi-weekly pay check from working at a coal mine to pay their bills or put food on their table and barely scrape by because of the hand they were dealt with in life.. They shut down those jobs and those people are left with nothing. Sure, save the planet, protect the future, but how about considering those that are trying to live now? people preach about health care, why not preach about making sure those people have job alternatives or a way to continue to live once the jobs that are "bad" for the environment disappear.

Anonymous

Sorry Colin, but I'm not sure I can bring myself to click on a link to the S*n.

Anonymous

I am not entirely sold on the idea we have much, if anything to do with warming the Earth. The predictions made by climate science over the years have been repeatedly wrong, and any theory that comes to continuesly incorrect conclusions should go back to the hypothesis stage. That being said I don't need climate science to know things like smog is undesirable and burning shit lowers air quality. I agree with a more pragmatic approach and an industry driven one. Incentivizing the development of cleaner alternates and safe use of nuclear energy are the way forward. Hell its actually my passion, and why I returned to college for an engineering degree in my 30s. I want in on the solutions on the actual ground level on that issue.

James Galos

with the lack of free speech and education going on at colleges today how do you feel about Milo? He much like yourself was run out of his profession (for now) for a poor choice of words. Most people know his outlandish statements that he makes to gain attention, but he is an educated man that makes well thought out arguments. He has said he will be making a big announcement soon so maybe it can make the news blast that day.

Anonymous

At first I thought the Russian thing wasn't very likely, but more and more of the inner circle are tied to Moscow. It seems now more to be beyond a coincidence. As far as the coal miner thing goes, I have a personal comment on this. I was able to enjoy many years with my great-grandmother. She lived into her 90's, and spent almost half a century as a widow due to my great-grandfather dying of black lung disease. Automation killed manufacturing jobs, autonomous cars will eventually kill truck drivers. The list is endless, if these miners are serious about working, and I know they are I never criticize anyone for being out of work, then they should be pushing for solar or wind energy jobs. As far as nuclear goes, just look to Japan. Also, check this shit out <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hydrogen-powered-train-zero-emissions-121538709.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hydrogen-powered-train-zero-emissions-121538709.html</a>

Anonymous

Also, Colin why are Republicans so vague on "regulations" they never spell them out. I'm a sensible person, but why is there always this lack of clarification. Look at their disastrous "health care" plan. They spelled it out and it had a 17% approval in the polls, which I don't take much stock in. Stricter voting rules, include eliminating polling stations. They want tougher rules but don't mention that one. I mean they need to step up and tell people the truth.

Justin Matkowski

Silence U blew my goddamn mind. These are ADULTS literally throwing tempur tantrums and demanding that other adults are there to "take care of them". I knew that this culture of coddling and intellectual suppression was growing, but honestly I had no idea the extent to which our universities are in a vice grip. Maybe part of my ignorance on the subject comes from being a Philly native, where if anyone is too sensitive, you get eaten alive haha!

GrisWold Diablo

What happened to Yale and is happening to universities is a pure reaction to when people values money more than they value humanity as a whole. You can see the direct correlation. And this even shows in the industry you used to serve, people stay quiet because they are afraid of loosing their money.

Adam Niksch (edited)

Comment edits

2022-11-11 21:04:50 カプリコンさん同様ブルアカやったことないですが、広告がどこもすごいですよね!少し気になってました。 便秘だったのか多い量排泄しててエッチです。 そして、まさかの流れないパニック、管理の人に電話で報告してて、まじめさが出てて好きですw 管理の人、絶対写真撮ってそう・・・・
2017-03-28 21:22:18 I'm always baffled as to why we won't pursue nuclear energy as an option to help ease off coal, oil, and gas. There has been so much advancement in this field (without all the advantages oil and gas have financially and the subsidies the green energy companies have). There's a documentary on Netflix called Pandora's Promise. I highly encourage people to check it out. It will give you a reality check on where nuclear power is today and how we may have been wrong to so easily dismiss it as too dangerous.

I'm always baffled as to why we won't pursue nuclear energy as an option to help ease off coal, oil, and gas. There has been so much advancement in this field (without all the advantages oil and gas have financially and the subsidies the green energy companies have). There's a documentary on Netflix called Pandora's Promise. I highly encourage people to check it out. It will give you a reality check on where nuclear power is today and how we may have been wrong to so easily dismiss it as too dangerous.

Thomas Doerr

I'm with you on the idea that science is going to have some solution to the global warming problem. Obviously it's not a leg to stand on and we shouldn't just say fuck it and ignore our carbon footprint but with the momentum technology has during our lifetime, that seems like a solvable problem by other means. They are trying to terraform mars for God sakes. If they figure that out I'm sure they can fix our own earth.

Anonymous

Re: global warming. There is scientific consensus on 2 major points: the climate is warming and human activity is the cause of it. That is where the 97% figure comes from. But the zealots often conflate this consensus with the prediction that not fighting global warming with their regulatory agenda will lead to catastrophic conditions for humanity. While I think it is probably advisable to invest in nuclear or solar energy to hedge against peak oil, and to put geoengineering solutions in place to slow down or reverse global temperature rise, it seems unlikely that climate change will dramatically alter our environment too quickly or severely for human industry and civilization to cope with. To quote Scott Adams, climate change is a "slow-moving disaster", and humans are pretty good at coping with slow-moving disasters.

Anonymous

Bill Nye is a fake scientist and a political hack. So it doesn't surprise me.

Anonymous

The "Silence U" was a great video, and very informative. I appreciate the share Colin.

ChristianLikeTheReligion

If Yale University is that bad then I fear as to how bad my own university will become. So far, no safe spaces and no infringement on Free Speech. Watching that video I was reminded as to how ridiculous that whole issue was and still is. It's a shame that not many students opposed those that drove out those two professors, but they wanted to get out and have a nice career waiting for them, which I can't blame them for. President Trump dismantling EPA protections does concern me greatly, but like you said, your average out-of-work American - whether they're white or not - don't care about the issue as much as they care about providing for their family and themselves. I'm sure there's some middle ground bipartisan leaders can come to, but as of now I have no idea how they'll get through to each other. Especially with most Democrats and some Republicans screaming "Russia! Russia! Russia!". I'm sorry Colin, but if you read into the intelligence report concerning Trump's administration and their alleged Russian ties, then that's all it. They're all allegations, with no hard evidence to back it up.

ChristianLikeTheReligion

I'll also agree with you that the nuclear option is a good option. My father is still working his ass off in oil rigs across Texas. It's a grueling job, but what he does he does to provide for himself and his family. He doesn't have an education, so he works. Onto the broadband privacy rules, I am appalled as to why anyone would vote yes for that. That would apply to them as well. Shit, this one really scares me. To think that a conglomerate of people would have the power to bundle up our history and shit and sell it to someone else. Fuck that.

Trey Castellanos

Silence U and the prt 1 at Brown... so pathetic that this is the IVY LEAGUE. Free speech and a lack of sensorship are what makes grow and evolve. These students don't even debate but just shout and bitch and moan till people appease them. I've been at the end of a lot of hurtful words due to my physical disability even at a private liberal arts college where I graduated last year and still receive them at my doctoral institution from others. I hear dissenting opinions from mine constantly but I always let them say their piece before i take them to the woodshed. The fact that they stated that statistics and analytics which are FACTs are oppressive makes me fear for our nation. For if we deny indisputable facts, then what can we accept?

Anonymous

All we need to do about global warming is to mass produce a bunch of robots to fully automate the cleaning of the environment. In about 50 years everything will be perfectly fine and there's no way it could ever go wrong.

Anonymous

At this rate I will also want to home school my kids college education. Is that an option yet?

Anonymous

Suprise, but there actually is such thing as "Clean Coal" that trump raves about. The U.S. , China, and India all sit on large amounts of coal. If the U.S. could provide an example as to how to process coal in an environmentally conscious fashion, we could reduce emissions across the globe.

Anonymous

Man, that Yale video made my blood boil.

Anonymous

That Yale video literally made me think of Colin and his tweet.. been seeing this type of reaction all around me

Miko Bell

I can't believe that Yale university video. People need to come back to reality. It kind of makes me sad to be a part of such closed mind generation.

Jim Leggat

I think just providing an incentive to people looking for alternative fuel sources may not be enough. We also need states to look into their dealership laws that stopped Tesla from having their own dealerships in a state, its absurd that a company can not sell their own product in a place to me. We also need to clean out the people that cause the technological stagnation we had when it comes to many things most notably here vehicles. We actively blocked the Volkswagen car that got 300 mpg from the US and the fossil fuel industry basically cause the car to be capped at a production of about 2000 in Europe. There are patents on the books from the 70s with this similar technology at 100 mpg. I also think we need to learn anytime we are de-incentivizing innovation there can be very real costs that occur. In my mind Detroit held on so far to long to the old and really did not put any innovation into the cars until the Prius blew up and made everyone take a second thought into what they were doing. I think we are currently in the middle of the cable companies struggling to hold on to what they had before but are on stronger footing than the auto industry because there is no Prius (aka a foreign provider to compete on a different access) equivalent yet to supply internet. When it comes to the coal miners jobs we need to do better by those people so many industries have nearly died and over time the jobs we have yesterday or today are just not going to exist with automation taking over so we need to start working hard now on how do we pivot to society were there are very few physical labor jobs remaining, People need some means to survive and part of surviving is the feeling you are providing something positive to society so someone just getting their needs met by doing nothing will work for a small % of people if it was figured out to be possible in magical christmas land but for most it just would not be great.

Anonymous

Damn.. sometimes I truly need a video like the Yale one to remind myself that, in fact, I am not the crazy one in this equation. Wow... leaves a pit in my stomach. Intellectualism is dead.

Stephen J Seidler

I respectfully disagree regarding dismantling environmental policies as a way to protect the economy for two reasons. First: it's a kind of protectionism that's being applied selectively, which I view as something a true free market would not do. I'm not unsympathetic to the plight of the coal miner, but why should we move heaven and earth to protect their livelihood when we then happily tell people displaced by other advances in technology to "suck it up, get off their butts and adapt"? With respect, in the past I've heard mostly disdain about the plight of cab drivers put out of business by Uber and, in turn, the future prospect of those Uber drivers being replaced by self-driving cars. Why is it that these workers, who also contribute to our economy, can be dismissed as a joke but those coal minors must have protection even at the expense of the environment? Secondly: it's shortsighted &amp; risky to, as it were, kick the can down the road on climate change and just hope that, one day, technology can make up for it. If we accelerate climate change, we lessen the time we'll even have to deploy future technology in any way that'll make a difference. What we gain from a few fossil fuel jobs now we will lose in the expense of dealing with more areas here and around the world that become less habitable, and the economic and political upheaval that will cause. It's been reported that climate change led to the drought in Syria that led to the civil war there that, due to ideological concerns around immigration, has become a humanitarian crisis and a likely flash-point of future armed conflicts. If we hold that climate change is not a "hoax", we must not then backtrack and treat the very current effects of it as if they weren't real either.

Anonymous

Going back to a topic from the other day, I'm seeing more and more of the Joe Biden love. Prior to dropping out of the 1988 presidential race due to a plagiarism scandal, Joe Biden was being outpolled by Dick freakin' Gephardt in Democratic Primaries. When he ran again in 2008, he never rose above singe digits in the polls. Thus, I'm a little confused about all of this "if he had run this time, he would have won" talk. The cynic in me thinks his recent popularity has more to do with a funny, viral Internet meme than any type of politics or philosophy. Then again, I'm certain our personality-obsessed electorate would never be so shallow.

Anonymous

Agh that Yale video made my stomach flip. I really don't understand how individuals who protest and silence voices who just differ from their own feel the need to be violent and get people fired. Absolutely delusional.

Misty

I really didn't think that the generation of participation trophies had that big of an affect, but clearly I was wrong. I am technically a millennial but my college experience was nothing like that. I also find it backwards that being white is now a reason to automatically dismiss someone's point of view.

Eric Iverson

In regards to climate protections: You are right, science is the answer. (And yes, nuclear is an incredibly viable option.) We aren't going to solve this issue by regulating the old paradigm, however, but by investing in the new and making it cheaper and more viable. We shouldn't need to worry about coal, because other options should be easier, more affordable, less dangerous, etc, etc. We aren't there yet, but I am worried that the current administration doesn't seem concerned with the danger of climate change... and as such.... doesn't seem concerned with getting cleaner power solutions up and running quicker. This, to me, is the larger issue. It's one thing to say green energy isn't ready yet, that we need coal now; its another to say climate change is a hoax, start diggin away.

Anonymous

The green energy issue is a very interesting and problematic one. Nuclear power is very reliable and safe, but the issue with nuclear plants is that they are extremely expensive and time intensive to build, generally running way over budget with many delays (look up Vogtle Units 3 and 4 as well as VC Summers Units 2 and 3). Then once those power plants are on, they still are more expensive to run than coal and especially gas plants, let alone the solar and wind farms that often are still profitable when power prices are negative due to various tax credits. When power prices are already depressed in markets where renewables are quickly gaining steam (Texas is the power market I focus on in my job), it's tough to sell companies on constructing new nuclear plants. It's pretty clear to me that wind and solar energy are only going to continue to grow, even if they lose support at the federal level (which I'm not convinced of either, keeping in mind that Texas became the country's leader in wind energy under Rick Perry). The problem is that since these forms of energy aren't 100% reliable as they are completely weather-dependant, you are always going to need quick-ramping plants that use fossil fuels to make up for any renewable forecast misses or just the loss of solar energy after sunset, at least until we have large scale batteries. TL;DR, renewables and nuclear power are great, but renewables aren't totally reliable for the power grid and nuclear power is suuuuuuuper expensive in terms of construction and just general day-to-day expenses. Also as long as gas remains cheap, coal is going to continue going out of business, no matter how hard Trump tries to make clean coal happen.

Anonymous

Here's a cool (albeit a little old) article on nuclear power if anyone's interested! <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a18818/can-us-nuclear-power-get-un-stuck/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a18818/can-us-nuclear-power-get-un-stuck/</a>

Anonymous

Sometimes I wonder if a college education does more harm than good. And most of what you can learn about any one topic can be found for free online.

Ryan Berry

As an addendum to my last comment, I was almost brought to tears seeing the Silence U video. It almost seems like a counter-prejudice movement that really fits the term I heard from Colin: the oppression olympics.

Anonymous

Do you have any sources or links that I can read up on your claim that "the predictions made by climate science over the years have been repeatedly wrong?" Climate change is such a difficult topic to find unbiased material on.

Anonymous

To me, the energy thing is wild, and I wish there was good solution. I think that we definitely need to be putting more time/money/effort/etc. into cleaner energy options. I am definitely not against nuclear energy, but I wanted to mention an issue that no one so far has mentioned: we still don't know what to do with nuclear waste. It's ferociously radioactive and our best solution right now is to bury it and hope nothing bad happens, such as an earthquake.

Anonymous

The mainstream media is going a little nuts with Russian coverage but I do think it's warranted. Where there's smoke there's fire correct? Micheal Flynn resign as National Security Advisor for his connection to the Russian ambassador. And now the FBI is investigating if there's more to it than that. This is serious stuff. So although it may be annoying to Sean Spicer to continue to beat back these barrage of Russian questions it is justified. Let the media continue to do its thing.

Anonymous

The Silence U video is a perfect description of what is going on at college campuses. I am currently attending a college that is so focused on safe spaces and not hurting others feelings. It's like you can never challenge a view anymore and it is absolutely disgusting. The real world isn't like a safe space and I think my generation needs to understand that. How are people suppose to learn if they never have their views challenged? It upsets me to see this not only happening on my campus and Yale, but all over the country.

Anonymous

I think the agenda here IS to make the world a safe space. Or at least to live in their preverbal safe bubbles where they aren't challenged. It's such a strange phenomenon. Why wouldn't you want to be intellectually challenged?

Anonymous

I cannot stand that people automatically think you're a racist, mysoginist, bigot if you are white. It's just horrible

Anonymous

The Yale video to me is almost the saddest thing in this burst. These are individuals who will inevitably be shaping the world some day, and get upset to the point of tears over a dissenting opinion.

Anonymous

Silence U is absolutely terrifying ... I actually don't know how that professor didn't punch that guy. What an amazing show of restraint and understanding. Remember they were attacking his wife!

Brogan Wassell

That yale video ... good thing I went to a small college instead.

Anonymous

I am so glad I'm already out of college, that Yale video is ridiculous. I don't understand how they don't see how hypocritical they are being.

Anonymous

I do agree that the best way forward as it pertains to the environment and providing energy, is a hybrid approach for the near future and moving towards more green options in the distant future and a scientific breakthrough may be coming soon as well. I just don't see how this will save coal and coal miner jobs or bring jobs to the regions that have relied on it in the past. Many energy companies have moved away from coal as it's harder to get out of the ground, costs more to transport, and creates coal ash which companies have to deal with after it is used, it contains many dangerous elements to deal with after it's used including mercury and lead. Also, many companies have converted to the use of natural gas which is easier to get out of the ground, cheaper to transport and burns clean without any of the waste products, any company that has converted to natural gas just doesn't have any incentive to go back to coal therefore the demand just may not be there for a ramping up of coal mining. I may be wrong about this these are just some of the things I've been reading according to people in the energy sector, time will tell.

Anonymous

I love the news burst, just wanted to saw that.

John Quinn

Yale makes me sad

Anonymous

We only have years, not decades to tackle climate change before it's too late, Colin. Pretending that reality doesn’t exist doesn’t make it go away.

Anonymous

My thought on the Silence U video is what long term deteriorating effects this will have on the working world's perception of a post high school education if grads are entering the workforce less prepared and less educated. Near long term on how the education from an individual school is valued by an employer upon graduation, in this instance Yale's given elite collegiate status as an Ivy League school, and long term the value of a college degree as perceived those hiring positions. Assuredly, workforce at large will continue to hire college grads if only for the degree alone as opposed to those with only a HS diploma, but will we see a dip in starting salaries immediately out of college as new hires will require more training and more time to grow into their working positions as opposed to those that came before, thus compounding the student loan debt/default situation (which also has no tenable solution in sight)?

ScKeptiC17

The Silence U doc was excellent - sharing it with everyone I know would appreciate this level of overview on such a pervasive issue.

Stephen J Seidler

The Silence U video is quite chilling. Universities, of all places, should be a place were ALL points of view are respected. Both Liberals and Conservatives must remember that, while free speech does not equal un-contested speech, attempts to unilaterally silence one side of a debate are NOT acceptable. We Liberals can not fall into the careless rationalization that, since Conservatism once tried to silence dissent on college campuses (which is why Tenure was established to protect faculty from political retaliation), that we now have the "right" to do it in return. We do not. If we become what we claim to oppose, then not only are we no better, but it then becomes arguable that maybe the other side has every right to silence us too. Colin, I truly believe this issue is at the core of what you're trying to build here. I am willing to call out my fellow Liberals if I see them behave in this fashion. I hope Conservatives will do the same, but ultimately I will try to be fair-minded no matter what others do.

Sand

In terms of the global warming issue, I believe it was found that all our regulations and anti pollutant efforts between now and 2025 would be offset by just three weeks of China's air pollution output. If that truly is the case, then I don't see much point in most any anti pollution regulation we could possibly use as its effect would be negligible

Timothy Monnig

I'd be curious to read that source if you can find it, Sam. I'm always interested in contrarian opinions regarding the climate change issue, because it's so dependent on lensing. There's sooooo much data on the subject, and the scales are so massive that people can say practically anything and find some validation. What other issue, after all, possesses the extreme polarity of being either apocalyptic or unprovable to the point of being a hoax (the former being a stretch and the latter, absurd)? All this said, I'm a data hawk on this issue more than any other. I do have some data regarding China's carbon emissions vs. the US (in 2015), and if what you say bears out, our regulations have been utterly worthless until now, and the Republicans need to dust off and get behind their free market plans to reduce carbon emissions. This problem, I'm afraid, isn't going away. <a href="http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=CO2ts1990-2015&amp;sort=des9" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=CO2ts1990-2015&amp;sort=des9</a>

Sand

I'll try my best to find the source and I'm a bit embarrassed I didn't have it in the first place as I heartily agree with you on all points

Anonymous

I have come across professional engineering journal articles purporting similar facts, in that the US has come a long way from it's big polluter days in the early 70's and are far outweighed by the economies of China and India, whom have in the same time frame rapidly increased their economies and manufacturing sectors but have given little care to environmental impacts in doing so. Our overbearing regulations serve little more than to stymie business given this point. Unless Trump administration starts looking to broker deals with these countries to agree lower to pollutant levels - and then you'd have to assume they'd follow through with the agreement with no real repercussions for not doing so - there's nothing US can do to stop major pollution on the other side of the world.

Anonymous

I love these blasts Colin. Thanks for helping keep things in perspective. Cheers

Spytle

The Yale video kills me. The hypocrisy of the people that fall into that part of the student body is off the charts.

Anonymous

It's 2017! Guess what? We have a more advanced understanding of climate science now. Our complacency has finally come home to roost. The last three years have been the warmest on record! Moreover, some areas on earth are now becoming uninhabitable due to rising temperatures. Colin doesn't seem to understand that the economic consequences of dragging our feet are worse in the long run.

Anonymous

I love your post. While I lean more conservative, compared to you stating you lean liberal,there's not a single thing here I don't agree with 100%. The fair-minded mentality is something so many of us have forgotten.

Justin Matkowski

Just something that struck a chord with me, and I'd be interested to hear if others got this impression as well. It seemed like there was a lot of "Me" and "I" in the students' verbiage. It sent me the message that their response was less about protecting other's rights but more "You're telling me what I don't want to hear, and I'm going to throw a fit over it." The opposition (who, sadly, faced career consequences for attempting rational discourse) were the ones arguing on behalf of society / academia and actually showing concern for something larger than themselves.

Chad Lewis

i'm really hoping you cover more stories akin to to the yale story. I'm fascinated by not only my own inability to understand how anyone could think that way or be offended by someone wearing a halloween costume. or umm make a joke on twitter perhaps. However the one part of that video that stuck out to me was when the young women was yelling "it is not about creating an intellectual space, its about creating a home here". If Yale isn't about creating an intellectual space then what is anymore? Thats what scares me. Also as far as it being a home nobody stays at college for ever and it is not a home. Its supposed to act as a conduit for the students to move on and hopefully accomplish great things. i cant for the life of me fathom how anyone could see it as a place of refuge and safeguarding. A place with no challenge. If Yale cant be a place for intellectual space and for people to be challenged i truly fear for the rest of the country.

Justis Salazar

Regarding the recent vote that passed in favor of unlocking more private internet data, I read an article (on either Gizmodo or i09) that stated the packets would be anonymous when sold on the market - so largely faceless data. Is this true? Any insight appreciated.