Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

By the time the '80s rolled around, the Cold War was just about over. The Soviet Union was slowly-but-surely crumbling, and the threat posed by Mutually Assured Destruction was waning by the year. That's what makes movies like 1984's American action classic Red Dawn so interesting. In its alternate history tale, the USSR expands its sphere of power through Central and South America, while NATO dissolves, the US becomes isolated, and its only allies are a downtrodden England and a nearly-annihilated China. The result, as it turns out, is World War III, and Red Dawn shows one rather peculiar theater of that conflict: A guerrilla campaign conducted by some high school students in rural Colorado. So stock up on supplies, raid your gun cabinet, and run for the hills, Wolverines: The communists are here, and a political reckoning is brewing.

Files

Comments

Liam Fagan

I could have sworn you did a red dawn knockback. Cant wait to listen, great film.

Kenneth Oms

I am so hyped for this one. WOLVERINES!!!!

Anonymous

I thought so too but I think it’s just been referenced a lot. I think it was one of Dagan’s movies that he was too young to see, or something close to that.

Andrew

I remember watching this movie for the first time. Just moved to California and asked the video clerk to recommend me a movie. He handed me a VHS of Red Dawn. Needless to say this movie is a classic

Martin

Looking forward to this one! Watched it with my wife recently (followed by the 'meh' modern remake).

Rob Aitken

I shall enjoy this but only after the Commie scum is driven from our land

Anonymous

I first saw this movie last year when i was deployed to Turkey during "WW3" surprising fitting

Kenneth Oms

Was the novel you were thinking of “Alas, Babylon,” by Pat Frank?

Rob Aitken

I am honored for my question to be read for such a fine audience. What Colin says in the beginning about changes to the world order is incredibly important. With NATO not a thing there is no unified force that would hold several Soviet Field Armies. The U.S. Forward deploys a great amount of our own forces, but Mainland based forces would be enough to hold and eventually repel (after some time) 3 Soviet Field Armies - which is what US Planning was designed around - However if the Soviets were able to reinforce from Europeans forces an additional 2 Armies it would make our fight that much harder. That, and most war plans called for the use of tactical nukes, so who knows. What also is important is the ability to move land forces through Mexico. There are very few natural defenses along the border, the same with Canada . This is why the US has always relied on a Strong Navy. If they could not use Mexico the Soviet proxies would have found the Gulf a hard sea to traverse with the US Naval Units found at Gulfport & Mobile An excellent listen - thank you Gents

Viktor

Enjoyed the conversation far more than the film.

Kyle Goodrich

Charlie Sheen isn't in Apocalypse Now, his father Martin Sheen is.

Anonymous

Thanks for reading my question guys! This was a fantastic episode!

David Graham

The single most Colin Moriarty thing ever put to celluloid.

Alec

WW3 was in January my guy, I know 2020 dragging hardddd.

Martin

My mistake was watching the good one first I think! Great ep btw :)

Anonymous

Has anyone seen tomorrow when the war began... Basically and Australian red dawn. Nostalgic movie for me.

Kevin Sullivan

I feel like I'm always commenting about an aside not central to the topic, but you have to let Dagan now that without "The Time of My Life" we never would have gotten this gem: https://youtu.be/R8Wde1fFvPg

Empty Symbol

My highschool was the "Raiders" with a wolf logo/Mascot so that would've been dope as fuck