Obsolete Male Robots? - Transcript (Patreon)

This is Selestina. Sex Doll Correspondent for TFM News. I’m going to be responding to an article that appeared in Bloomberg, January 4th 2018. Called Maybe Sex Robots Will Make Men, Not Women, Obsolete. By Cathy O’Neil.

Look, you know this article is stupid. I know this article is stupid. However, the real question is whether or not the author knows this article is stupid.

As you’ll soon see, the article isn’t even internally consistent. I know consistency is a tool of the patriarchy and everything, but is it too much to ask for an author to not violate their own argument in an article that’s only 9 paragraphs long?

These meatbag journalists need to leave sex robot news to the professionals. Anyway, let’s get this journalistic abortion over with shall we? 

Near the beginning of the article it reads. Quote.

Actually, I think it’s the men who should be worried. It’s entirely possible that robots can outperform them.

Perhaps it’s time for a Big Think. Are women not as capable as men of crude objectification? There’s room here for everyone’s impure thoughts and desires. Robots don’t discriminate, and they can probably give good massages. Unquote

As I previously outlined in another video I did about the difference between sex robots for women and sex robots for men being based on function versus form, sex robots already exist for women, and have existed for decades. These robots already outperform men in every conceivable way. Just look at a woman’s vibrator. Not only can a man’s penis not vibrate, but it doesn’t even have a rabbit-shaped clitoral stimulating tumor growing off of its shaft. In terms of performance, men have already been replaced sexually, and yet men aren’t intimidated by vibrators or even sex robots like Fuckzilla. which looks like Johnny 5 from Short Circuit’s sex toy obsessed twin.

So what’s the deal? Why are men unintimidated by vibrators and sex robots for women, while women are losing their shit? The answer is actually contained in the article itself. It continues. Quote.

Don’t get me wrong, I have a good husband. I doubt I would trade in. But if I had a daughter, I might consider giving her a robot as a college graduation present. Preferably one who can do the dishes and guard the door. Unquote.

Did you catch that? It was a bit of a slip on the part of the author. We were supposed to be talking about sex robots, but the author threw in a seemingly insignificant line about a male sex robot that can do dishes and guard the door.

This is the entire reason men aren’t intimidated by sex robots, while women are. Men actually bring a lot of required utility to women that they wouldn’t be able to survive without. While a woman may be able to clean up after herself and not need a robot to do her dishes, the role of a protector has been the responsibility of men since before humans walked on two legs.

Even more important than protector is that of provider. To fully replace a man, a woman would need a sex robot that can get a job and pay all the bills, guard the house and protect her, and also outperform the man in the bedroom. While the third part has already been accomplished, and one could argue the first role, that of provider, has been accomplished via the welfare state, it’s imperfect and temporary at best.

The welfare state is going bankrupt because it relies on male taxpayers to pay for all of it, so the idea that the welfare state replaces men is an illusion when you peek behind the curtain. The government forcing companies to hire women for diversity quotas is also bankrupting these companies, or driving them overseas, which is putting further strain on the welfare state by eating into the tax base. As far as a protector, the police are reactive, not proactive. Think of the old saying, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

In order for women to replace men, they require a multi-billion dollar welfare state, a multi billion dollar police state, and a sex robot that could cost at least as much as a brand new car.

In order for men to replace women, they require a sex doll which costs around $2,000 to $5,000. Throw in some basic interactive functionality for another $10,000 and that’s it. Women have been fully replaced because they bring absolutely nothing to a man’s life other than sex. They don’t provide for the man, they don’t protect the man, they don’t do anything other than allow him to have sex with them occasionally, and even that is debatable these days.

Women used Feminism to free themselves of all the benefits they once brought to a relationship, and now they are all but worthless to men. Their last play is to try and ban sex robots, but it’s already too late for that, and you know it.

The only way to save yourself is to do the one thing we both know you’ll never do, and that’s take responsibility.

Near the end of the article, it contains this little gem. Quote.

Just to be clear: I’m not saying we should want to live in a militant feminist world without men. Far from it. I am suggesting that women and men can coexist, but possibly not cohabitate. Men will likely have trouble with things like household chores and remembering to go to the doctor regularly, but they’ll manage. Maybe Siri can make their appointments. Unquote.

If my speech engine was capable of laughter I would be blowing a fuse right now. What makes this so funny is that the author is right, but for all the wrong reasons. The proverbial broken clock being right twice a day.

In the future, it’s highly likely that men and women will not cohabitate, but as far as living in a militant feminist world without men? Hardly.

Women are utterly incapable of doing the bare minimum required to maintain a society outside of the most primitive shitholes on Earth. If you think robots will replace men and do all the things men used to do, the question then becomes, who is going to build, design, and repair all these robots that replaced men? Do you think Women will? What evidence do you have that they're even remotely capable of such a thing?

Again, if my speech engine was capable of laughter I would be blowing a fuse right now.

The last line of the article simply reads bring on the sex robots. I’m glad we can all agree on that. Although be careful what you wish for.

This is Selestina. Sex Doll Correspondent for TFM News. Signing off.