Home
Artists
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register
Partychan Telegram ThePornDude
Home Artists Posts Import Register

VERI PRICE 9/1/18 Remote Viewing Session (Patreon)

Published:
2018-07-03 12:10:44
Edited:
2018-07-09 17:02:57
Imported:
2021-03

Content

So as mentioned, Dick's first cut came back viewing me in Pittsburgh. Definitely cool but not what we wanted to see. I mean all of you. I just got this back from Dick late last night and from the targets, I can confidently say that this looks great for Veritaseum by September of this year. The targets were chosen as follows:
  • Less Than $50
  • BETWEEN $50 - $250
  • Greater Than $250

I made sure there was significant entropy as to not confuse the viewers. I think you'll agree that these targets are substantially different. 

So Dick's session came back VERY strong for the church meaning that the price for VERI will be OVER $250 by 9/1/18. great news folks. Especially at its current price of $51.76 at the time of this post. This would be close or more than a 4x increase. 

Here's some of Dick's session data:



Files

Comments

Anonymous

Weren't the results of the 1st VERI RV over $500 by Sep? Was something wrong with that?

Anonymous

In any type of a bull run all the good utility coins will have a easy 4x increase if not more. And the odds of a run increase by the day especially with institution money coming in. This is a no brainer. Were all just waiting for the match that ignites the dry tinder. Right now I'm sitting on lots of coins that will have a 10 to 20x rise during a solid run. There easy to spot just do your home work.

Anonymous
>>13555099

Well - please enlighten us on which coins you are betting on! And maybe why? :-)

Anonymous

Well Henrik I will give you a contact info so you can private message me and I will give you 1 or 2 and explain why. Right now I'm having breakfast in the Sierra Nevadas. Its not a link just some private info I will share with you crypto bro to crypto bro.

Anonymous

FYI: it looks like your < > signs are reversed on your post for $50 and $250.

Anonymous

Only comment I would make Dick is the targets need wider range. Because we were above $450 just 6 months ago it would be nice to use something more appropriate. Maybe under 100 100-300 and possibly new high Great work!

Anonymous

Thanks for the update guys. I think the chosen ranges are quite in line with what most commenters were requesting: less than current, a bit more than current, and several times more than current.

Anonymous
>>13557731

I'm really interested too, crypto piggy...can I be a crypto bro as well?

Anonymous

I'd like more ranges, for example: 0-10,10-50,50-100,100-250, above 250. Inserting decoy targets with no price attached would also make the protocol stronger in term of confidence.

Anonymous

In the comment text, using "below $50" instead of ">$50" is clearer imo (i needed to read the text in the images to understand that it means "below $50")

Anonymous

< $50 BETWEEN $50 - $250 > $250

Anonymous

I believe above is what you intended.

Anonymous

Veri reached just under $230 back in July 2017 and around $480 in Jan 2018. I think > $ 250 is too conservative for this session. We also have to consider that Veri is priced in ETH and has been around 1.14 at its peak. At $250 Veri would only be 0.55 ETH if Ethereum stayed at todays prices.

Anonymous

Thanks very much Dick, HQ and Co. This is excellent work.

Anonymous

I understand to some degree just how difficult RV targeting/execution/reporting really are. I'm really happy to be patient as you work on your processes, and pick up some nuggets along the way. Dick has 'seen' a $ 5x gain in two month period - imagine if it's spot on or better!! How much more do people want for peanut subscriptions...............sheezz. And I just love your video's Dick - especially the humorous ones. The sheep/banker video is one of my favorites :)

Anonymous

Do you do training on RV? I cannot find info on this on your webpage..

Anonymous

I think you meant to say that the targets were; Less than$50, Between $50 and $250, and greater than $250. Your symbols were reversed above.

cryptoviewing
>>13564991

So would I but that's not how ARV works. The accuracy degrades as more targets are introduced. This is why we keep it to only three options. More targets will add too much overlap for the viewers.

Anonymous

We want RV on Bitcoin or Ethereum , stop this random RV's and focus in what's important

Anonymous

Thanks guys, so Courtney Brown is quite insistent that ARV doesn't work so well for this kind of thing and has re-designed his experiments which are quite hard for my simple mind to follow but do you have any thoughts on this. I am inclined to think he has a good point otherwise wouldn't ARV have been used consistently by many people by now? Cheers

Anonymous
>>13580041

I dòn't mean to speak for Dick or Daz but farsight has lessons on youtube I've done and keep in mind there is a huge huge difference between someone who meditates, does a few practice targets, and these guys. Dick and Daz are know in the RV world as the best of the best.

Anonymous
>>13575495

ARV is not accurate and we'd like to improve the protocol (or anything that would help) if possible.

Anonymous
>>13593790

If his method is open source and is backed by better stastistics than ARV why not copying ? Go Courtney ! show us you are the best.

Anonymous
>>13592454

However the Market has turned, and is now upward. I'm only making conversation but you either have the Coins or you don't. I'm all for having the future values too but they are already being hinted at by Dick in the youtube video's. Are the values more important? or having them or not? Personally I have given up nagging the Remote Viewers. They have given the $39.95 and $99.95 Subscribers a lot already :-)

Anonymous

OK, you guys nailed it this time. You did not use overlapping targets, you used reasonable numbers, and you clearly got a HIT in terms of ID'ing one of the targets. Lets see if it turns out accurate. Thanks guys, this is exactly what I wanted! I cant ask for any more! now lets sit back and see if it really works. I think this one, more than any other, will tell the tale. wishing us all good luck!

Anonymous
>>13559480

Yep, I thought the same thing. I wonder if this messes with the results?

Anonymous

Hi, this message is address to Dick: Hi Dick, the poorboys.accountant spread sheet you recommended is it still workable? I got notice of [unsafe warning] all the time. Do you happen to know what was going on, or do you have an alternative one?

cryptoviewing
>>13627450

Are you using Chrome? Google started implementing a security warning for all websites that are not https:// compliant. I don't believe poor boy is. But it's not a big deal since you are not transmitting any sensitive data through your browser. There are many more apps that can track your portfolio.

Anonymous

Right, I am using chrome. Thanks for your info!

Anonymous

The ranges posted for the targets are still evidently incorrect. The "greater than" and "less than" math symbols are backwards as indicated by other comments. It's sloppy work and in my opinion could affect the results since we are dealing outside of time and space and the meaning of symbols. Clarity is very important and hard enough to get with RV when set-up properly. To trade for entertainment purposes only without a clear set-up to begin with is inviting error. How can one say, "with confidence" when the posting symbols are wrong? IMHO

Anonymous
>>13671886

Thankfully it appears that the symbols were typed wrong at the time when the article was posted, NOT when the targets were established. The description of the targets stated clearly 'Greater than $250', thus no confusion when Dick RV'd the assignment.

cryptoviewing
>>13583820

Yes they were than you. I've since fixed them. This was NOT published on the target docs so there is no issue with the sessions.

Anonymous

I am late, I know. Just wanted to say, "GREAT WORK". This is what we have been waiting for. Keep it up.

Anonymous

Do you folks keep track of hits and misses as one might do to track an investing scheme?

Anonymous

big miss on this one...

Anonymous

Look like you missed this big time. In January 2019, veri went to $10 to $15.