Home Artists Posts Import Register

Poll

What renders for exclusive sets?

  • Keep it as is (continuity is sexy) 1
  • Moar positions (I dont care about transitions) 2
  • Bruh, I dont care, gimme bewbs! 2
  • 2023-02-22
  • —2023-02-28
  • 5 votes
{'title': 'What renders for exclusive sets?', 'choices': [{'text': 'Keep it as is (continuity is sexy)', 'votes': 1}, {'text': 'Moar positions (I dont care about transitions)', 'votes': 2}, {'text': 'Bruh, I dont care, gimme bewbs!', 'votes': 2}], 'closes_at': datetime.datetime(2023, 2, 28, 17, 0, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2023, 2, 22, 8, 39, 36, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allows_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 5}

Content

So I've been wondering. Right now I try to uphold some sort of shot continuity with the exclusive patreon sets (as in, what happens next, how to switch from one position into the next etc.) and this very often results in 20-30 image sets that only have one or two positions, because you might want to do more than one angle per position and such. As some of you have raised that as an issue in the past, I wanted to know if you would prefer me to just render more various positions without context/transitions instead - this still means I will do a couple of renders as setup to frame the "narrative" of the set though, dont worry.  

Comments

No comments found for this post.