Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Hey All,

Here are a few stories I've been reading/watching today. As promised, I'll be doing this multiple times a week, so we can start a collective conversation.

Feel free to add your own stories in the comments, and talk amongst yourselves as to what you think! As always, keep it civil. I will  expel any person(complete with pledge cancellation)  who doesn't treat other people here with kindness, even if there is a disagreement. Debate all you want -- it's essential to intellectual growth -- but don't make it personal or hurt others around you in the process.

Neil Gorsuch Talks Roe v. Wade: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/03/21/gorsuch_if_trump_asked_me_to_overturn_roe_v_wade_i_would_have_walked_out_the_door.html

My Take: I'm of the mind that Roe v. Wade is essentially bulletproof, even if the Supreme Court starts to stack conservative. While this video clip doesn't necessarily prove that Gorsuch won't vote to overturn it, it does prove that Trump doesn't seem all that interested in seeing that done. (And, even if it is somehow overturned 4+ decades after passing, the 10th Amendment will see it returned to the States.)Trump is clearly a social moderate or liberal masquerading as a social conservative.

Trumpcare Divide Healing?: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CONGRESS_HEALTH_OVERHAUL?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2017-03-21-03-20-21

My Take: I don't understand the point of this legislation. It seems to solve almost none of the problems with Obamacare, and actually appears to make some issues worse. The status of the Medicare grants seems especially tenuous, and could cause a lot of problems. I think Obamacare needs to be fixed, but it needs to be fixed with a bill that's actually better. Either way, I don't know for sure if the GOP Senate will pass this thing, which makes the House voting on it at all kind of silly, politically. No one in either chamber should expose themselves on this vote if leadership isn't positive it will pass, and even if they're sure it does, they better be careful, because this bill can have catastrophic effects on their base.

The Democrats Have A Leadership Void:http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/324903-for-democrats-no-clear-leader

My Take: This is a serious problem. As the story points out, Obama may have found success from 2009-2017, but the Democrat party has been wiped-the-fuck-out during that time, especially at the state and local levels, where Republicans completely dominate. Democrats have to focus on finding a moderate, relatable person to push their agenda forward. Warren may be appealing, and I think she'd be interesting to watch on the national stage, but that may not be the smartest thing to do. They throw Mark Cuban into the mix here; I think he runs in 2020, but as an independent.

French Presidential Debate Gets Crazy:http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_FRANCE_ELECTION?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2017-03-20-17-47-43

My Take: This is going to be one hell of an election to watch, especially since it happens in two waves. I'm completely fascinated by Marine Le Pen, who I think may very clearly be suffering from the same polling malfunctions that led most people (including me) to believe Trump didn't stand a chance in November of 2016. Her populist message is appealing to people, and that seems obvious, considering how all of her rivals are targeting her. Sound familiar? If she wins it all, it's proof that Brexit is a trend, not an outlier. If she loses, liberal Europe may be able to breathe easy again. This is gonna be close, particularly in the final round.

Is Tomi Lahren Imploding?: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/03/21/tomi-lahrens-nightly-show-pulled-for-a-week-after-her-abortion-comments/?utm_term=.a83a1231a782

My Take: I feel bad for her. To be clear, I don't know her personally, and I don't like her style at all -- it's too riled-up and incendiary for me -- but I think what's happening to her here is bullshit. They've now suspended her show, and I think it's clear she's probably on her way out. People's political opinions should be allowed to evolve, and, way more importantly, people shouldn't have to EVER fit completely into a political mold to associate with that mold. I'm especially confused by Glenn Beck's response, here, as I said on his radio show to millions of people that I'm pro-choice. There's more to this story than I think any of us know. I'll be interested to watch it develop.

I hope you all have a great day! Be good, and take care! -Colin

Comments

Joseph Noll

Wow I wasn't expecting one of these so quickly thank you for being on your game

Anonymous

Worth the $5 already

Anonymous

Great stuff!

Anonymous

Damn Colin I don't have time to read all that haha

Anonymous

oh wow, if this is a taste of the content I'll be getting I'm all in. Really useful Colin, thanks as always for keeping us challenged and engaged

Anonymous

So who hires Tomi now? Does she continue in a medium similar to what she does now? YouTube? Podcast? She's not just going to disappear.

Anonymous

I really like this format, thank you!

Anonymous

Have a great day, Colin. Keep fuckin' that chicken.

Anonymous

This is already going to be awesome. You not only educate, but you help me with finding things to research and teach myself. Also I know this may not be the correct place but do you have any thoughts on Mass Effect yet?

Andy Reno

Boom! Worth my money. This Patreon is like Christmas.

Passive Pixels Edwin Castillo

Keep doing​ this, this feels like a politically slanted C&GL lite, keep it up Col

David Mann

If this is a sign of things to come, which I believe it is, then we are in for one hell of a ride. Thanks, Colin. Loving this!

Anonymous

Colin, did you listen to Dan Carlin's last Common Sense podcast? He talks about health care in the US and compares it to other comparable countries. It's fascinating.

Anonymous

This is fantastic, haven't had time to read any of this, but definitely looking forward to it!

Anonymous

Totally agree about Tomi. What's happening to her is completely ridiculous and simply shows that both the Left and Right are giving in to thought-policing.

Anonymous

As a pro-lifer I understand that the government/courts are not the answer. You have to build that culture from the ground up. Colin thanks for referring to us as pro-life, not anti choice.

Anonymous

Gotta come up with a catchy name for these post, AP wires but with Colin's own spin on it

Ivan Hornett

This is cool. Have a good day Colin.

Anonymous

It's strange in the european countries we see these number of different parties created due to the fracturing of ideals, but in the US we still are so ingrained with the two party system the parties will just eat of their own if there is nary a thought out of place. If this ideal continues it is doomed to fail at some point.

Anonymous

Also this exactly why I backed!

Anonymous

Colin could you (or anyone else) explain to me how the 10th amendment would see Roe v Wade return in the event that it is overturned while Trump is in power? (Sorry I am not from the US and therefore, do not have the greatest understanding of the constitutional law and how some of the amendments are involved).

Anonymous

Colin, these kinds of posts are awesome! I genuinely appreciate that you give us a link to the actual article and then give us a separate and fully fledged opinion on the matter. I look forward to many of these in the future! Keep it up! :)

Anonymous

Who needs P.S. I Love You on a Tuesday when you can get News Burst(ed) by Colin instead? :D

Anonymous

I think it turns into a YouTube show, maybe on her own honestly. She's got a lot of fans and I would like to see her continue, maybe less fire and brimstone if she goes on her own as well

Anonymous

This was great! already, my small pledge is paying off. Thanks Colin!<3

Anonymous

Fuck em up Col!

Anonymous

Awesome, thanks Colin! I'm already happy with my pledge 👍🏻

Anonymous

I haven't had the time to really look into gorsuch much yet, but from that one line he seems like a badass constitutionalist. Colin are you planning to do a video all about health care and how trump care is not the answer? That's my opinion anyways. I would like to see your in depth analysis on why we don't open the boarders on providers and make it a true free market for healthcare.

Misty

I was hoping to see content exactly like this. Your thoughts on relevant news stories. I'm also happy to see where you get your news from. It's so hard to trust any media at the moment so it's nice to see where you sample from. Keep it up!

Jason Pettet

Worth the backing already. You are on it man. I'm so excited to be informed from someone I can trust.

Anonymous

Colin this is great. Really appreciate 1) articles of interest 2) you opinion and debrief of them. Seriously worth all of my investment just with this. Thank you thank you. Podcast version one day as well? Would love my daily dose of Colin News while I am driving to work.

Anonymous

Yeah that's a shame what is happening to Tomi. It just shows that the "mainstream"(or more prominent news sources) on both sides will cannibalize themselves if the proper narrative isn't achieved by their bosses and the heads of the company's. I think there's more conservatives who are pro choice than anyone might think. Honestly when the term "alt right" started going around I thought it meant conservatives who are socially liberal(like myself) and people Tomi, Lauren Southern, Milo, etc... I'm still not even sure what alt right actually means. Maybe you can write a piece or video on what the term means to you. Great work bud, can't wait to see your video content.

Colton Caulkins

Good stuff! Your thoughts are truly refreshing

Josh in Tampa

Nice! I love the idea of this. Taking big news of the day or week and posting it with a link maybe to a relevant story and then your thoughts for ppl to read and respond to. As soon as I'm off work I'll be reading thru. Thanks

Anonymous

I think Le Pen will make the first round in the French elections but the system is stacked against her in the second round - she will likely pick up some from the Republicans but I think many will hold their nose and vote for Macron (assuming he also gets through)

Miko Bell

This is so amazing. Colin you are off to a great start this is how news should be a story and a perspective or opinion open for discussion.

George Newton

Frances turn to submit to the populist will Colin , your thoughts are spot on no mainstream poll can show this undercurrent as it's never manifested itself in brexit or trump. Largely i would say this is the silent majority who don't fight in social media who quietly rock up and vote - unusual idea as a way to show the system your not happy ?!? And how are these people who have a right to vote treated by the vocal left or right wing extreme - they are shouted at and derided - this calling them to fall silent in what should be their greatest victory ? This agin has led to apathy amongst the electorate who seem to no be suffering fatigue and betrayal. This further segways into your comments on the Reubin report about the pile on etc the populist vote is piled on by the same types who hounded you - Colin I ramble I love this interaction and look forward to lots lots more , I could talk for hours - will share more thoughts as I take an understanding of the more USA centric issues that I can't comment on until I know more about them

Lucas Gremista

I think the GOP is so focused on the pettiness and the promise to repeal Obamacare that they havent really thought much ahead of that. I think this will bite them in the ass. Roe v Wade seems untouchable for me and for a good reason, a pro life conservative is like a anti gay catholic, they are decreasing, but there are still many stubborns out there. Tomi Lahren will get a way better gig than what she has right now, it sucks she is going through tha but she has an audience solid enough for other media outlets want to have her under their umbrella, she'll be fine.

Anonymous

There was a GOG topic not too long ago I think it was the punching nazis one. But Colin said something along the lines of just let them talk (this was in reference to Richard Spencer) because soon they would talk themselves into a corner. Does anybody feel like this is what's happening with Tomi now ?

Andy Reno

I agree that it was an interesting show. I wish he would have dove a little deeper into the failures of European style health care for a more rounded show, but I did learn a lot.

Mostly Indies

This is going to be the most no-brainer montly subscription in my list. And we don't have to deal with the insanity of YouTube commenters? HUGE BONUS.

Anonymous

I stopped listening to Glenn beck and stopped watching the blaze along time ago. I'm a conservative and I don't think Glen beck aligns with the conservatives very well. He's right up there with the same liberals they bash on his show for suspending her. Did she even say she was pro choice? I thought she just said for the government to stay out of it. Haven't had time to really look into it yet.

Anonymous

Yeah I'm not too keen on what's happening to Tomi even though I dislike her. I think her point was correct in that pro-Choice is the more 'conservative' view point. Keeping the government away from a personal choice is always a good thing. Social conservatism is one of those things I wish the Republican party would run away from, but I'm not sure it will any time soon.

Anonymous

I think we can all agree that the idea of Obamacare was great but that it's execution left much to be wanted. I don't see this new bill that the GOP are proposing will fix many of the issues concerning the cost of healthcare in this nation or the ways it's being funded. I would love some bipartisan bargaining to get a bill done. The issue is that these politicians have massive egos and it gets in the way of real work getting done. You have to give a little to get a little.

Anonymous

I love this content. Thanks for sharing, Colin! I hope this turns into a daily thing. I'd suggest people watch this BBC analysis of the French debate to get a bit more in-depth commentary and hear some clips of the actual debate: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9NNKB4V56k" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9NNKB4V56k</a>

Anonymous

Love the idea of this. Can't wait to read the stories after school.

Alex Ball

In my honest opinion, I believe I have an outstanding Democratic candidate. I'm and Independent. I voted for Obama in 08, couldn't vote in 2012 because I was deployed, and voted for Trump. This person has exceeded expectations at their former positions and has a very strong nature. Condoleezza Rice.

Jason

I am not a huge fan of Tomi Lahren myself, her style isn't something I like but yeah I think it is odd how she is being treated right now, it seems she is on her way out anyways here soon. I think she has great things about her and would like her to learn to discuss with others better, when she was on Bill Maher show she seemed to be shown how she can't debate others well and I think her style is just angry rants and more of a show than actual substance. I think she for sure is smart and would like to see her get a good shot in the future of having a good team around her and ability to hone her skills.

Anonymous

Tomi Lahren should be able to have her own views. (I don't like Glenn Beck either.)

Anonymous

Exactly. She talked herself into a mess that she's going to struggle to get out of.

Nathanael Haller

I think Mark Cuban would be the best alternative to Trump in 2020. He's intelligent, a billionaire against another billionaire will give them both an even playing field, has some decent political views (from what I've seen), and is a moderate. I'd rather him do what Sanders did than run as an independent though.

Anonymous

It would be interesting to see how the cannibilazation of the left and right will play out in the long run with future elections.

Anonymous

Am I the only one that reads Colin's posts in his voice? lol haha Great job man keep up the great work and I can not wait for the video series!

Justin

Mark Cuban intriguing to me as a candidate. He is a smart man who has a strong business background, I would be interested in hearing his views outside of the economy. I also feel like Trump may have started a movement of "celebrities" running for president. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

Andy Reno

It's creating a Dave Rubin/Colin style independent YouTube movement. Let the Left and Right eat themselves. In the market place of ideas intellectual honestly will win.

Andy Reno

Yup, totally agree. Every one rich and famous is looking at their TV thinking "Oh... I could do that!"

Stephen Fontana

Well my comments didn't post :( Re: Tomi From what I can find, she has a history of not being so far to the right. This may shine some light on why the change in tone. I hope she does her own thing so she can be herself without influence. Re: The Dems I think it should be mandatory to have a 4 party debate stage. Take the 4 highest poll...Getters? And allow them to challenge the far right and far left on stage. There is a middle ground that the people deserve to see.

Codename Trigger Thumb

I agree with Gorsuch, the original ruling on row v wade is based on interpretation from the constitution. There is no hard textual clarification on abortion so he's kinda like...look, it's been debated and decided by the court leave it alone for now. Now if the LEGISLATIVE branch of our government wants to pass clearer laws on it they should do that. If something reaches the supreme court it would be because the laws were not very clear. As for "Trumpcare" I am not impressed AT ALL by the replacement care proceedings. And this is coming from someone who voted for Trump. These clowns have had six years to put something better together, and this is what they come up with? Now to be fair, there is a lot to consider, but my gut says this is the compromise that had to be made if any chance of the bill passing was to be had.

Chip Corley

This is great Colin! I'm already loving the direction of CLS. Keep it up!!!

Anonymous

Looking forward to all of your content regarding current events! While it does seem like Roe V Wade is untouchable at this point it seems like there are more battles to come regarding accessibility of the procedure. A lot of states have created laws meant to make it difficult for clinics to stay open or requiring invasive diagnostics. I wonder if any challenges to these laws will come to the Supreme Court. It seems like significantly limiting access would achieve the same goals as overturning RVW.

Anonymous

For me the subject is complex. Because I feel both sides are not willing to understand the others point of view. Believe it or not, those pro life are not only white old Men that want to tell women what to do with their bodies. In fact plenty of women are pro life. From their perspective, this is literally murder. From a conservative stand point, I think it's interesting. Almost all of our rights have the caveat of "you have your rights until they encroach on others rights". So you have the right to be angry, but you don't have the right to take out your anger by randomly punching a person in the face (because they have a right to be able to walk down the street and not have physical harm). So in this instance, people believe that once life has formed, it's a person that has the right to life, and rights like you and I. Also most of our rights also carry the weight of responsibility for our actions. Yes you have the right to have sex. You have the right to do what you want with your body (although gov does seem to have laws that prohibit our rights such as drug use). But once life is created, it's now a consequence for your actions where your rights no longer get to encroach on the rights of the life inside of you. So I could see why some would see this as a conservative view point.

Mike R

With the Roe v. Wade decision, the US Supreme Court declared that there is a constitutionally-guaranteed right to abortion before the third trimester. When it comes to writing their own laws, the 50 US states have to follow the constitution, and so they had to allow for abortions under this decision. If that decision were overturned, it wouldn't ban abortion throughout the US, rather it would simply remove the requirement for every state to allow it. So what would happen is that some states would ban it and some would allow it. (Colin mentioned the 10th Amendment to the constitution because it reserves to the states all rights not specifically granted or prohibited by the federal government. )

Anonymous

The Democratic problem is interesting; I don't have a lot of love for the left, but I want to see them get someone strong because like the market, I see competition in politics to be a good thing (with the republicans having a near monopoly like control right now in two, soon all three branches). So, it's rather disappointing not only to see them struggle, but to try and resolve their current crisis with more extremism that'll just further turn off moderates and give credence to supporting Trump. I don't think he'll run for election in 2020, but whether he does or doesn't the election will probably still go to the right at this rate if their idea of a main candidate is someone like Nancy Pelosi, Elizabeth Warren, or Bernie Sanders.

Anonymous

I have a feeling that if Marine Le Pen wins that will be beginning of the end for European Union

Marco Bruno

The Tomi situation is really disheartening. The right had been priding itself on not silencing/lambasting individuals for having a different opinion. They can't claim that mantle any more.

Anonymous

Genuine question on repealing Obamacare: How can it taste "right" to a person, regardless of political affiliation, to know that something you do could potentially strip 24 million souls of life changing medical coverage? As a Brit, with a ravenous appetite for US politics, I'm trying to understand what sort of ideology can justify an acceptance of this outcome. Thank you for your responses.

Anonymous

The healthcare bill isn't loved by anyone at this point. Trump says he is a deal maker, so I'm ready to see him get this deal made better. I think healthcare is so broken in the US it's about time to go to single payer. I love capitalism but it feels like some things shouldn't be led by a profit motive.

Anonymous

I'm really torn on the whole mindset behind Tomi Lahren getting fired. The left (current implosion notwithstanding) has found immense success in closing ranks as an ideological monolith. People who have had Milo-like scandals (except much worse) are defended to the death, as long as they toe the party line. This makes them a force to be reckoned with in cultural and political circles. There's a book called Rules For Radicals by a guy named Saul Alinsky; it's a manifesto for the left that has a central message: the ends always justify the means if the means achieve the end you desire. Any ideological contradictions are permitted. The people that get thrown out are ones who don't follow the narrative to a T; all other despicable behavior is excused in favor of keeping a consistent narrative. Diversity of thought and conversation will always be superior in morality to the closed-minded monolith that is the modern left. The difficulty for me is seeing how effective their tactics are, and feeling helpless in the face of my own standards that they clearly don't keep for themselves. It's like I'm fighting with two hands tied behind my back, and The Blaze untied one of those hands, for better or worse.

Anonymous

I suspect Mme Le Pen will win in the first round comfortably. The second, who knows? I'm not sure that I would take that bet. As an Englishman, I find French politics to be something of an enigma...very difficult to predict the Gallic mood.

Anonymous

Hey Colin, love this sort of post! It is structured in a similar way to a Cyber Security newsletter that my former professor sends out. Keep it up!

Steven Camilo

This is like getting the news from a knowledgeable and trusted friend. I dig it. Thank you Colin and looking forward to the first video.

Anonymous

The affordable health care act is a great idea. However, I agree with Colin that it needs to be reworked, not dismantled. They need to figure out a way to make health care more affordable but with our forcing it down people's throats.

Anonymous

The Tomi situation is really weird and it was very out-of-character for Beck to suspend her. Maybe she's not as ideologically solid as she seems.

Anonymous

Great articles Colin! I haven’t had a chance to read all of them yet (very interested in the French Election article) But I have some confusion of this Tomi Lahren kerfuffle. Admitatly I don’t like her or the message she pushes but I don’t really understand the reaction both right and left outlets are having towards her. It seems to me that Lahren is more of a spokesperson, in interviews I’ve seen with the daily show and a few other outlets she doesn’t seem to give much deep thought to her politics or idelogies. She seems more concerned with being in front of the camera. Which is fine. But I don’t understand why the left and right are both burning her. Shouldn’t the conservatives be happy that they have a younger more moderate voice in their corner and shouldn’t liberals be happy that she supports one of the major issues they fight for? Why can’t we celebrate common ground? I get most my news from liberal slant sources and the general tone I got was the same I’d read as if she’d said one of her more inflammatory statements. Again I don’t like her, and a part of me is glad to see her lose some air time…but I wish it was for one of the hundreds of horrible or idiotic things she’s said instead of maybe her first coherent political thought which was totally messured.

Anonymous

The AHCA is a joke. Obamacare was I believe a good first step to addressing the issues we face around healthcare, but it was extremely flawed in many respects. The AHCA does literally nothing to address those flaws, and it even makes things a whole lot worse for many people. Change the premium model to be based on age versus income... that's the Republicans' genius plan they've been incubating for 8 years? Pathetic. I, like Colin, completely cut ties with the Republican party after Trump became the party leader. I voted for Clinton because I felt she would have been a better President out of the two choices, but after Trump was elected I still maintained hope that with his business and management experience, he may have a few good solutions. That hope is all but gone...

Maxx Lazos

About to make a nice post addressing a problem with ALL proposed healthcare systems

Anonymous

Wholeheartedly agree, fella. Surely the end doesn't always justify the means? Capitalism doesn't have to be continually severed from basic morality. It is an imperfect philosophy, in which only a few are wholly satisfied.

Anonymous

I'm a little bullish on Le Pen won't win the second round (I know, I know). In a run off against Macron (pre-debate) she was behind 60-40. A 20 point gap at this stage is significant. It's way, way higher than the lead Trump had over Clinton, and even wider than the Brexit polls. I think people forget that the EU referendum polling was very close, even Colin I think sometimes wrongly puts it in with polling misses when he talks about the 'Shy Tory' effect. Leave was ahead in the polling averages throughout most of June until the final polls had Remain ahead by just 0.5%. It's a weird reversal where for Brexit the bookmakers for some reason took a 0.5% lead to mean remain was 1-4 favourites to win, yet the bookies odds are much closer on Le Pen winning even though she is behind by 20 points. It's an over-correction because they don't want to call another populist vote wrong again. But in this instance the odds should be long for Le Pen. Macron is a safe bet with a 20 point lead. Brexit and Trump doesn't change that

Anonymous

I don't know if there is less pro life conservatives, i consider myself pro life, but i do believe there are a growing number of pro life individuals that also believe that it is ok for others to make that choice for themselves. Just because I believe one thing does not mean i am going to force my belief on others.

Anonymous

Its a complex issue. Both sides admit Health Care does not run well. But also with a few exceptions most of the stuff "Obamacare" was supposed to do backfired. At the end of the day it added a whole lot of red tape, time spent, and outright cost to employers and self employed people very little of which provided better coverage or covered more people. Overall costs went up for everyone and access to premium care went down for many. Not saying the new plan is better but that is why so many people want it to go away.

Anonymous

On Tomi, People are not always ideologically sound and consistent, especially over time. That is just human nature, people are allowed to change opinions. I am more classical liberal leaning, so I can't stand much of what she says, but I do not agree with firing, or suspending her over a change of opinion over time. Even if it is just for attention.

Anonymous

Yeah, I'm not familiar with The Blaze but this doesn't seem to be a case of those "5% on either side" Colin talks about. I await right-wing and libertarian bloggers/podcasters to call out this bullshit like they would if it were on the left.

Anonymous

Totally agree with Colin on the Healthcare legislation. That bill is a joke..

Anonymous

Regarding Le Pen/Europe Discussion: Are social media bubbles an American thing, or do they also occur in Europe? (I’m 43 and kind of new to the whole “social media” thing, so this might be a dumb question) Just wondering about similarities with Trump election. How many folks in the French country side are with Le Pen, but too sacred/ashamed to admit it?? I was in Switzerland during the transition to the Euro and themes of populism ran high then. Many predicted (including my dad who was a currency trader) the inevitable fall of the Eurozone.

Mike Smith

With regard to the Tomi issue, it's worth pointing out that Glenn Beck is not calling the shots here. Although he owns The Blaze, he is not the editor. He said on his radio show yesterday that you can have a job at The Blaze if you are pro-choice. Sources:<a href="http://www.glennbeck.com/2017/03/20/glenn-addresses-tomi-lahrens-pro-choice-stance-on-the-view/?platform=hootsuite" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://www.glennbeck.com/2017/03/20/glenn-addresses-tomi-lahrens-pro-choice-stance-on-the-view/?platform=hootsuite</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/glennbeck/status/843678863460917250" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/glennbeck/status/843678863460917250</a>

Anonymous

Everytime I hear from Gorsuch I keep thinking what a smart choice. He reminds of William Fichtner's charachter in The West Wing. When Bartlett was nominating two justices. Glenn Close's liberal judge and Fichtner's conservative. Sorry just had to bring up West Wing

Joey Gondhalekar

After seeing what happened to Tomi, and her positive attitudes on pro-choice, I actually thought about you. You said before that you were once pro-life, but are now pro-choice. May I ask what prompted that change? I was once pro-life as well, but in high school I came around and became pro-choice after seeing so many children being born into more and more unfortunate situations in the U.S. Did you have a similar approach in your shift or was it different?

Justin

Stephen, It would be super interesting to expand the field. I would have loved to see Johnson on the debate stage this time around.

Anonymous

Yeah no one that wanted Obamacare gone is happy with this.

Anonymous

Can we talk about the mass hysteria with Russia? In 2012 Obama mocked Romney for suggesting Russia was anything but an ally (yet the FBI and democrats officially called them an adversary yesterday). The Obama admin also did a lot in favor of Russia even a year before he left office. Outside of Ukraine, I didn't see Obama really get aggressive towards condemning Russia until his final year. No doubt Russia meddling in our elections is not acceptable (although we meddle in other countries elections the same way). And I understand changing positions when it comes to who is our allies and adversaries. But I feel like some of the mass hysteria about Russia, is an attempt to de-legitimize the massive loss the Democrats took across the board. They have non stop refused to take responsility for their own loss. Refused to look in the mirror and reflect. All they have done is blamed other things. First it was white women. Then it was half the country are KKK. Then it was all Comeys fault of the FBI. Then it was fake news. Now it's 100% Russia. Again I have no doubt that Russia has interfered and is doing bad things. And I also think there is shady stuff going on with Trumps campaign and his connections to Russia. But I also feel the mass hysteria is getting a bit out of hand. Take for instance how misleading the media is being about Tillerson? All the headlines: Tillerson to skip NATO to meet with Russia. I thought this was a big deal. In reality, he's skipping this NATO meeting but having someone second to him to attend. And he's actually meeting with the President of China in Florida. He's meeting with Russia later on in the month. The media makes it sound like he's literally skipping NATO to meet Putin. When in reality, he's actually meeting with China's Presidnt during this NATO meeting which is actually a big deal.

Anonymous

I feel like you're right about Row VS Wade, but at the same time I see protesters at the local women's clinic like 4-5 times a week, seems a little weird seeing that it's been 40+ years

Garrett Gabehart

Colin, I think you and many of the commenters here have the completely wrong perspective of "the Tomi situation" For nearly two years now, Tomi has been advocating on The Blaze for a pro-life position. She has been on the fence about it - she has been hyper-critical of pro-choice causes for a long time. She actually developed a viewership and listenership based in-part on her pro-life stance. For Tomi to go on a competing network and completely contradict her comments and opinions on The Blaze, not to mention also calling out her fellow conservative co-workers as hypocrites, is beyond the pale. I have a friend who is a co-worker of hers at The Blaze. Here is his take on the issue if you are interested. <a href="http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/pro-lifers-arent-the-ones-being-hypocrites-tomi/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/pro-lifers-arent-the-ones-being-hypocrites-tomi/</a> Colin - Imagine if Gregg left the Kinda Funny studios after a show, went over to gametrailers.com, did a video with them saying that he was a lifelong fan of the Xbox, and that anyone who thought the Playstation was the superior console was delusional. It's not so much the fact that Gregg holds that opinion that causes the resulting friction - it's that he hosts a show that focuses primarily on the Playstation, for years has vouched for the validity of Sony products, and works alongside other Playstation fans who are obviously going to be offended when he calls them delusional. I think that's a decent analogy for what's really going on here.

Anonymous

This is a great format, Colin. You could've easily pasted a few links and called it a day. I love that we're getting not only relevant and important stories, but your take on them too. Keep it up!

Jeremy Cochran

Hey Colin, awesome first post...already worth the $$$...! So what do you think about the Comey led FBI investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible ties to the Trump campaign? I was kinda blown away to hear him say it's been going ok since July and really interested to see where it goes next.

Garrett Gabehart

Edit: She HASN'T been on the fence about it. Please forgive the redundant commas - I wrote this on my phone.

Anonymous

In regards to Tomi Lahren, I cannot stand her. However, I do think it's ridiculous that she was suspended for being pro-choice. I think this is a huge problem with politics right now. There is no grey area. You have to be all or nothing in these parties and that prevents them from coming together and finding a compromise or balance.

Anonymous

Its funny regarding Tomi and the pro-life pro-choice debate I was strictly pro-choice at a face value because it made sense to me. However as I tend to lean republican, watching the primaries this past election brought up arguments I had never heard of or thought of up till that point. This made me consider more of when the decision of abortion could or couldnt be okay. As I do not support the idea of goverment dictating a lot and like small government i lean heavily to pro-choice still.

Marc Boggio

I love that I have homework right now! (No sarcasm, for real) So often online debates are sprung from one shared article and most debating haven't read anything other than the headline. I'm going to read these articles tonight and hopefully, contributing something meaningful to our conversation!

Anonymous

They seem to be a universal phenomenon. Trump capitalized upon Americans' hatred of the media by positioning himself as the candidate the media and the liberal elite are afraid of. This no doubt helped him in the older cynical demographic in the heartland (and clearly the rust belt, which won him the election). It's my understanding as an American that the popular opinion to have in Europe is a more liberal one, meaning the populist candidate could harness the same energy that Trump did, as well as point to the American media's projections of calamity and doom not coming to fruition now that Trump has been in office for two months as evidence that the media is lying to you. This is a powerful idea especially in an increasingly Orwellian time.

Anonymous

I was confused with Glenn Beck's approach to Tomi as well until I just watched the sit down he did with Dave Rubin on Rubin Report (if you don't know who this is you haven't been paying attention :P ) . When asked why he did all the "crazy stuff" while on FoxNews his response was: "So, My job as I saw it, um, was to get ratings. That's my job, to get ratings" I feel the only reason this whole thing doesn't make sense is because we are all looking at it and trying to "figure it out" collectively. I haven't looked to see what crazy stuff the Blaze has been reporting on since the election, and I'm almost certain a number of the content on the right stopped looking as well. This was the perfect opportunity to get clicks. I don't think she is going anywhere. The Blaze will get more clicks by those who support Pro-Life ideals and Tomi will get support by those mad about the suspension for having an opinion. Both of those things benefit the Blaze and ultimately Glenn Beck. The more we talk about it under the guise of "Hypocracy", "Pro-this", or "anti-that", the more publicity they get and the more traffic they incur. Just my thoughts on the subject...

Anonymous

Tomi is pretty brutal. Her delivery is a turn-off to me, though I will at times check out what she has to say. Eh, I'm of the mind that it shouldn't be uncommon for people to have some beliefs that track more left/right than their core. The best thing she can do is go off on her own and do her thing without having to answer to anyone...it seems like she'd have a decent following.

Maxx Lazos

This past weekend, I was in Washington D.C. lobbying members of Congress on four different house bills on behalf of a healthcare-related organization. One bill in particular is H.R. 372. Now please follow along, and I will explain why in our current system, neither Obamacare nor any healthcare system that depends on insurance companies competing with one another, is unsustainable. In 1944, the Sherman Act was passed, which essentially is what led to all private sector industries to be subject to anti-trust laws, meaning they would have federal oversight, preventing collusion and price fixing, among other things, between competitors in the same industry, stifling competition. After swift and aggressive lobbying by health insurance groups, the US Supreme Court decided in the “McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945” that health insurance companies were exempt from the same antitrust laws that every other market sector had to abide by. This has led to the huge problem we see today with insurance costs being so unaffordable. By not having to abide by the same anti-trust laws that EVERY OTHER INDUSTRY has to abide by, insurance companies can legally collude with one another and have a “gentleman’s agreement” to not drop below a certain price, no matter what. So, whether it’s the ACA, NHCA, or any proposed healthcare system that relies on the “free market competition” of healthcare insurance companies, none of them will lead to more affordable prices until “McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945” is amended via H.R. 372. Thankfully, Congress will be voting on HR 372 very soon, and if any of y’all are into contacting your representatives, I highly recommend pressing them on this bill. Sorry for any typos, as I quickly typed this during my lunch break lol. I hope you find this enlightening! I’d love to hear what y’all think!

Anonymous

Wow. Great thoughts here. Enjoyed reading.

Anonymous

@turbo girl my comment was supposed to be directed to everything you've written lol. Not good with tech meant to reply to one of your comments

Anonymous

Hey, Colin. Thanks for this. Regarding Trumpcare, the bill, I agree, is a waste of time. It won't pass the senate as is and I would go for Rand Paul's plan to repeal and then replace separately on the same day.

Anonymous

I think the suspension was for ratings. It benefits both sides (Tomi and TheBlaze). Watch the interview with Glenn Beck on Rubin Report. It was only a few weeks ago and he says clear as day that the crazy stuff he did on FoxNews was all for the ratings. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deAON1QryIg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deAON1QryIg</a>

Anonymous

This is awesome, Colin. Thank you. Will read after work.

Anonymous

I made a silent promise to myself today that I will use the phrase "gallic mood" more. Thank you

Anonymous

Regarding, Tomi. I think the problem is that she changes her positions depending on the audience she is with. She's pro life one minute and then not. Also she called conservatives hypocrites for being pro life which is absurd. If you are pro life you likely believe that abortion is the murder of children inside the womb. Not allowing murder outside the womb isn't considered an example of big government, so why should taking an unborn child's life be any different? I think this is the problem.

Anonymous

Losing your show over a political opinion is bullshit. I do agree though, I think there may be more things behind the scenes with the Glenn Beck response.

Anonymous

My take on is why do we have to repeal and replace Obamacare. Just repeal it, and loosen regulations and let the free markets figure it out.

Anonymous

I think the "Democrats have been wiped out" thing is overblown personally. Yes, it has been particularly bad for the down-ballot these last 8 years, but similar losses on a lesser scale happened to Clinton and Bush too while they were in Office. It is easier to fire up a base in opposition than it is to get people OK with a President to show up in midterms, so the party in power almost always loses seats. Unprecedented gerrymandering also helps overstate the problem - in 2012, overall House Democrats got over 50% of the combined national vote, but got much less than half the seats. This is partially the aforementioned gerrymandering, and partially the natural clustering of liberals in cities. I think if Trump continues to be this terrible, he will see similar losses in 2018. Sure the Senate map may be very friendly to Republicans, but I bet Democrats either re-take the House, or at least heavily slim down that GOP majority. Further, we have an opportunity to also get back some Governor's mansions, people always underestimate how important that is too. Even the Senate isn't out of the realm of possibility if Trump's popularity is low enough, which it very well may be if Obama's economy doesn't bail him out. As for Trumpcare, ya, it is just watered-down Obamacare, really a tax cut for the rich disguised as "reform". It's nice to see that now that people have something to compare it to, Obamacare is net positive in approval ratings for the first time ever.

Anonymous

Roe v. Wade: This issue, as everything else, should be returned/left to the states. Smaller the federal government the better. Yes, they are necessary, but let's limit their power in any way possible. It seemed Dave Rubin's stance was turn everything over to the states except this issue. Am I mistaken? What's your stance, Colin? I guess we know why you haven't made a second appearance on Glenn Beck. Haha! France: How about those labels: "independent centrist" vs. "far-right populist". I wonder with whom this publication agrees. Thanks for your work gathering and posting these stories.

Anonymous

As for the Democrat leadership issue, I completely agree. They are in desperate need of a moderate dem to take charge of the party. Unfortunately, the current far-left Liberals want nothing to do with moderation, and are only interested in pushing the farthest left agenda they possibly can.

Anonymous

I think Tomi is great and all but it's the fact that she calls it hipocritical to be conservative and be pro life. When the whole point of be conservative is the conservation of life. I don't care if you change your views. I have in the past two years. Just think it's weird for her to say that when she not a year ago said otherwise. I don't think she should lose her show but that's a whole different conversation. I'm a pro lifer but I also feel as though people should be able to choose what's best for them. It makes me sad that people would want to kill a child but I get that there are outstanding situations that would constitute an abortion. Even if rape and incest it roughly 1% of abortion cases.

Anonymous

Just joining the chorus here in saying I appreciate this post a lot, and hope to continue seeing more of them.

Mike Smith

The context of that Gorsuch quote had to do with whether Trump's people made him promise to rule a certain way on certain cases - which would clearly be inappropriate. That is what Gorsuch meant when he said he would have walked out the door. This statement doesn't show one way or the other how Gorsuch would vote on abortion cases, and it doesn't show anything about Trump's dedication to pro-life causes.

Anonymous

While in almost all cases regarding economics I'd agree with thus, I have trouble applying true free markets to healthcare. For example, if a patient needs a life saving drug that only one company makes, or one specific procedure that is extremely expensive, there is no competition to drive down prices. All the leverage in the negotiation is in the hands of the healthcare company or provider. I personally have no idea what the correct solution for healthcare is, or if one even exists, but that's my main concern with this argument.

Anonymous

Rand Paul's Healthcare Bill is much more in line with the reform that is needed. For there to be a healthy insurance market, people must be free to choose the plans and policies that most aligns with their lifestyle (for instance a single 20 year old man shouldn't be forced into paying for contraceptives or maternity coverage). This combined with competition across state lines can do what mandates won't do...get the young and healthy to pay for insurance to fund healthcare for the old and sick.

Anonymous

Hey! Colin has spoken at length about diversity in media, and he does not believe in diversity for diversity's sake. If it was the creator's vision that Danny Rand was a white man from New York that survived a plane crash and was raised by monks/taught kung fu, than it is your job as a consumer of that content to respect that vision. It was one of his final podcasts with Kinda Funny I believe. He is all for diversity if it fits the creative vision of the product, I believe he also spoke about this on his (2nd?) Rubin interview, where he uses the mostly all white cast of the Uncharted series as an example. edit* hit enter too quick.

Anonymous

I've been seeing conflicting reports lately about Trumpcare. Some say it does not enable competition, others say it does. Does anyone know of a credible, unbiased source that illustrates both the pros and cons of trumpcare? Does this legislation promote competition between state lines?

Atlas522

One of the main problems with both Obamacare and the GOP plan is that they conflate health insurance with health care. Fundamentally health insurance is a financial product and is distinct from health care. Both plans did/are trying to make health care more affordable by messing around with insurance, which at the end of the day isn't going to work as they plan it will. They don't address the root causes of why health care is expensive. Honestly I wouldn't be opposed to straight up subsidizing health care for people who can't afford it on their own. That would be much more preferable than to have politicians screwing around with an insurance market they just do not understand whereby they create all sorts of unintentional consequences that we have to deal with later on. Case in point - just look at the increasingly growing premiums in today's Obamacare insurance market. They come down to the rule requiring insurance companies cover pre-existing conditions. The rule sounds great and makes you feel good but it goes against the whole idea of insurance. Imagine if car insurance worked this way, you could just buy insurance after you've totaled your car and the insurance company is on the hook for it. It'd be impossible to make money that way and we're seeing the consequences in the insurance market today with how many companies are withdrawing from the Obamacare exchanges. (And sorry if I'm reposting this - my original comment seems to have been deleted somehow)

Anonymous

I was raised a hardline Conservative and have the utmost respect for the positions of returning everything to the states, however it's not possible under the Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment has a provision known as the Equal Protection Clause. This clause originated as a means of ensuring equality for Blacks in the South. The clause reads: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws (emphasis added)." This clause has been the root of the largest decisions we've seen since the clause was adopted. For instance, Bush v Gore was decided using this clause, saying that the recount was unconstitutional because a hanging chad was counted as a vote in one county where in another county it was not, therefore the citizen whose vote wasn't counted was denied the same protections that the other citizen was. As well as the gay marriage decision, which really is the key to understanding how this relates to abortion. When gay marriage was legal in one state but illegal in the other, gay citizens in the state where it was illegal were not afforded the same protections and benefits of marriage that citizens in another state were, therefore for gay marriage to be illegal is a violation of the equal protection clause. The Court ruled that it is unconstitutional to make gay marriage illegal now. (Many people who argue against the decision conceptualize it as the Court making it legal in all 50 states where in reality all they did was make it illegal to make gay marriage illegal). If abortion was returned to the states, a pro abortion state like California would offer the right and a pro choice state like Texas wouldn't, so the eventual decision of the Supreme Court would be to once again make it illegal to restrict a woman's right to an abortion. Further than that though, if it was returned to the states this would drastically damage the pro life desire, as the test for when an abortion could be performed would be reduced to the most lenient state. For instance if California had abortions until the fetus exits the womb completely, then by the equal protection clause Texas would have to guarantee the same right, taking abortion from only in the first two trimesters to until the child exits the womb. If the pro life movement wants to achieve their ends, they must create a specific constitutional amendment. There is no other way which won't backfire.

John Carey

On France: As someone who works for a European company, I am really interested in what's happening in Europe. There's talk that if Le Pen wins, it could spell the end of the euro. If France sets the precedent of abandoning the euro than it could set off a chain reaction of other countries doing the same. If that happens than Germany's position is weakened due to the benefit the euro gives their manufacturers and if that happens, I wonder what that would mean for Merkel who, while still expected to remain Chancellor, is not as popular as she once was. The thought being the Germany could see the AfD take control in September. That's taking a long leap from France's elections but I do think France's elections will tell us whether or not we are looking at the end of the EU. (Here's an old Forbes article that paints the picture: <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilwinton/2017/01/23/european-elections-could-undermine-the-euro-and-german-automakers/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilwinton/2017/01/23/european-elections-could-undermine-the-euro-and-german-automakers/</a>#493f15662423)

Anonymous

Thanks for this Colin! I enjoyed reading about your thoughts on all this. Looking forward to your first full Colin's last stand video! :)

Anonymous

They'd rather defend a narrative than defend free thought, it's the same pattern as the left. Their goal is probably pretty simple: "We don't advocate for the killing of babies, therefore we'll fire our thought-leader employee for holding that position."

Anonymous

Love the news burst concept! After listening to Glenn talk about the Tomi Lahren situation, I think it's clear that the suspension has nothing to do with her stance on abortion. When talking about her comments, Glenn said he welcomes differing opinions and has made sure to allow diverse voices. I think you are right that there is more to the story than we know.

Anonymous

I'm not by any means a fan of Obamacare, although I do personally know some people it's helped (I even helped a friend of mine navigate the 'marketplace' and choose a plan.) I don't think the AHCA is the right direction to take. Most of the 'fixes' aren't really fixing anything. I'm from Kentucky, both my Senator, Rand Paul, and my district's Congressman, Thomas Massie, are massively against the AHCA. They are some of the more public voices from the GOP against the bill. Personally I wasn't effected by Obamacare and wouldn't be effected by the AHCA in the short term. As far as the Democratic leadership is concerned, I think sticking with someone who already has had a public voice would be a mistake. While Warren would make for a fairly good party leader, I believe she is too polarizing a character. She was so outspoken this past election that I couldn't imagine her capturing any moderate undecideds. I also think the populace as a whole might be sick of hearing the same people speak out over and over again; Enter Mark Cuban. I think he WOULD be able to capture some moderate votes, but I fear the American people may be exhausted by the "Outsider" experiment. If Trump's first term ends up going smoothly, I think other outsiders like Mark Cuban could start coming out. On the other hand, if the Trump presidency ends up being trash, not only would Americans be apprehensive to trust another outsider, and that distrust may also extend to a third party candidate which would be unfortunate. I think for the Democrats to find any success, they need a leader who isn't necessarily new to politics, but new to the national stage. Someone the country hasn't seen before; hasn't heard talk over and over again. Someone who's life doesn't revolve around speaking out against the GOP like Warren's does. A fresh new face is what they need. A moderate who won't immediately alienate the entirety of middle America like so many other Democratic leaders do.

Roddie Maine

Posts like this is why im so excited for this new venture!!!!! love the commentary from Colin and all the conversation already happening.

Anonymous

Russia is the largest threat to American security today. This is because of their willingness to take aggressive action. There are a ton of facets to the Russian problem, and I don't fully understand the situation (as it's currently my field of study so I'm learning new things every day) but here are some highlights: 1. Russia's seizure of Crimea by force violated one of the international laws that the US takes most seriously, that there will be no changing of borders by military force. This violation is the reason for the Obama Administration's pivot in 2014 to understanding Russia as an adversary. 2. Election meddling is part of what in Security Studies is called Hybrid Warfare - conducting acts of war in a way that is difficult to deter and respond proportionally to. Cyber attacks are also in this category, and we know Russia is responsible for cyber attacks against us. 3. The combination of Russia violating international law and conducting Hybrid Warfare against the United States displays that Russia is a Revisionist power, a nation which wants to alter the International Status Quo. In general the international status quo is that the United States is the only super power, and China and Russia are the next two most powerful nations. China is content with the current status quo and does not want to elevate itself to the level of the United States but Russia seeks a return to being equal to the United States as the USSR was from the 40s to 1991. 4. Because Russia is a revisionist power again, Europe is threatened. Now we are in fact partially to blame for this. After the fall of the USSR in the early 90s the United States believed that Russia would fall in line and not threaten the Status Quo. NATO, which had previously existed to keep a buffer between the US and USSR, now served to be the extent of the United States' global defense perimeter. We expanded NATO by adding countries eastward and getting as close to Russia as we could, so that our defense perimeter basically encircled Russia. While this was a defensive move, it was perceived by Russia as an offensive and aggressive move, meaning they needed to defend themselves by rising up as our equal again to stand their ground against our advances upon them. 5. This expansion of NATO happened under the idea that Russia wouldn't threaten these new states. But now that they do, the Article 5 obligation hangs around our necks. If Russia invades Lithuania which was added to NATO recently and borders Russia, the US would have to go to war with Russia because of Article 5. This would be a nightmarish spiral into a World War and possibly Nuclear War. The cascading of alliances like anchors around necks would be very similar to what precipitated and broke out in World War I. This is why Russia is our largest threat. We drove to the edge, threw it in neutral, and tied rocks around our vehicle. If Russia kicks one over the edge of the cliff, the world gets dragged down to Hell with it.

Brad Gray

Neil Gorsuch Talks Roe v. Wade: I think it’s important that Gorsuch keep the narrative being that Roe. v. Wade has already been decided. While I have great respect for the pro-life belief (raised in an evangelical church but now pretty socially liberal) it is not okay for the right to try and hijack the Supreme Court in order to change the status quo on what the American people have ultimately already decided. Trumpcare Divide Healing?: As somebody with great employer provided health care (state legislature employee) I always have trouble discussing this issue because I know that I will most likely have great coverage no matter what happens with repealing the Affordable Care Act. It definitely looks as if the House just wants to repeal the ACA to be able to say they fulfilled their campaign promises, without having any real care of the outcome. As a Republican (albeit a socially liberal one as stated above) it’s upsetting to me to think that this was the best my party could come up with. It just plays into the left’s narrative about Republicans. The Democrats Have A Leadership Void: I definitely agree with Colin on this one. Donald Trump won for a variety of reasons but the biggest is that he ran against a very lackluster opponent. During the primaries you even saw that the Republicans had a very strong bench of candidates that could be run again down the line. The Democrats even after their defeat still don’t. Instead of taking these next couple years as “rebuilding years” in order to have greater success down the line, they are too concerned with showing their opposition to Trump. Nobody on the left is stepping up to lead the party, and in turn nobody is trying to give a vision for what the party can be going forward for those that either stayed home on election day, or voted for Donald Trump believing that he was the change they needed in Washington. French Presidential Debate Gets Crazy: I don’t have much to say on this. A lot of polls have Le Pen winning the first round and losing the second to Macron. However as we in America and those of you in the UK found recently, polling data is not as reliable in this age of nationalism and political uncertainty as it was in years past. It will be interesting to see what path France takes. Is Tomi Lahren Imploding?: I don’t agree with a lot of Tomi’s style. I do watch her on occasion because her bluntness can be refreshing sometimes. However Blaze has for some time now stood by Tomi when her polarizing views have been in line with theirs. I understand they are a private company that does have a foundational set of beliefs .It is disconcerting however that Glenn Beck’s network, which he claims was founded as opposition to mainstream media selectively using facts for their agenda, would in turn censor a voice on their own network because her beliefs don’t fall strictly in line with their agenda. It seems the left aren’t the only ones that like to live in an echo chamber.

Maxx Lazos

Read my post about HR 372. I'm a healthcare-profession lobbyist and I you are right that the proposed fixes won't fix anything.

Anonymous

Colin, here's Glenn Beck's response to the Tomi Lahren situation: <a href="http://www.glennbeck.com/2017/03/20/glenn-addresses-tomi-lahrens-pro-choice-stance-on-the-view/?platform=hootsuite" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://www.glennbeck.com/2017/03/20/glenn-addresses-tomi-lahrens-pro-choice-stance-on-the-view/?platform=hootsuite</a> He seems to be implying that it's not her pro-choice stance that makes this bad. It's the fact that she has, on many occassions, made statements that weren't intellectually honest. Her making a pro-choice comment wasn't what riled up Glenn Beck, it was her exclamation that there "isn't a constitutional argument for the pro-life stance". This is very similar to other statements she's made as well.

Phil Crone

Love the News Blast! Good conversation starters. I immediately gravitated to the Trumpcare article. I've been in finance/actuarial for a Big 5 insurer for close to a decade now. I actually took the time to sit down and read the AHCA proposal, and it feels like a total stop gap to me. A "Obamacare is untenable, let's just push SOMETHING through" sort of thing. I'm surprised it's being sold as the full on replacement, as there isn't much mention of Medicare at all, and I'd imagine there is going to be some sort of reform there. I wonder if Trump's threats have to do with what happens if nothing is put in place to remove Obamacare by 2018. I have no idea what the exchanges will look like - no major insurer is willing to play in that space anymore thanks to its unsustainability. (The numbers were staring us in the face as early as 2014, but we just never bought that the trend would continue.) The Medicaid expansion always struck me as tenuous as it was using federal dollars to subsidize only states that opted it - I wouldn't have been a fan of any of this had I been from one of the 19 states that didn't opt in to expanded Medicaid. I do like the new bill's "almost no strings attached" version of a $100B "trust fund" if you will that any state can readily get funding for. There is some stuff here that makes sense, but like Obamacare, it's a bill that was built without much compromise. Obamacare overpromised and we're seeing the ramifications. Trumpcare underpromises and sets us back to right where we were in 2010. It'd be really cool if people, I don't know, actually talked to each other and came up with a middle ground, no?

Atlas522

With all due respect in regards to Roe v Wade, the American people did not decide on anything - that's the point. The supreme court made their decision and took it out of the hands of the people. I think it would have been better to have left the question to the states and gradually let a consensus emerge on the issue rather than SCOTUS essentially legislating from the bench and creating a constitutional right to abortion. I'd like to think that if that happened the issue would be much less contentious than it is right now. And this is coming from someone who's largely pro-choice.

Anonymous

There may be more to Tomi Lahren, but I see right leaning radio/TV attacking her as a poor choice. Isn't this the actions that they say the left performs repeatedly. I'm a moderate right, and this stuff just makes me irritated.

Anonymous

Great choice of articles and issues. Personally would like to hear you discuss healthcare, because "repeal and replace" was one of the cornerstones of the Trump campaign and his voters will judge him on how he handles this. I also haven't heard you speak about healthcare and it would be interesting to hear your opinion. Even more so I would like to get your historical take on services brought about in the 30s when Keynesian economic theory was prominent. Trump is obviously a believer in aggregate demand being paramount for a healthy economy which is inherently not a conservative stance. The historical context you could bring to light would be fascinating and it would give you a chance to study how economics and social programs interact. Finally, don't waste your time with Tomi. She's just a talking head and your time and efforts are better spent on real issues. Cheers!

Adam Niksch

I'm at work and planning on catching up on this reading during lunch but I snuck a quick peek at the comments just to see what's going on. Colin brought up some hot button issues and I wanted to see how people responded. It's amazing what happens when sane people debate issues rationally. I miss this type of discussion more than I thought. Thank you for this Colin and thank you everyone for being respectful. I'll chime in once I've had a chance to read up on everything as well.

Anonymous

So I think Roe v Wade can and will be turned over eventually, I don't mind it going to the states just because I think that's how our government should work. But for the federal government to come down on one side of such an unclear issue seems absurd to me, essentially when one side is convinced abortion may be a moral equivalent to murder. You've said yourself your 60/40 on the issue, which I take to mean your 40% sure that abortion takes an innocent life. That, to me, is troubling when you think about the gravity of the claim. If I was only 60% confident that some behavior would NOT result in a innocent life being taken.. well, I'd probably err on the side of caution and just not do it. The federal government may need to enforce certain human rights for the "greater good" but I really hope you can see that abortion ought not ever fall into this camp. It's a woman's right to abstain from sex. Of course cases of rape of such a small minority we ought to spend energy figuring out how to help women and to prevent rape, call evil what is truly evil, and help women deal with those events without further justifying an act that has a 40% of taking an innocent life..

Anonymous

These articles were great. I've never really had a solid place to get news. I would see articles here or there but to have these given to us and being able to read them and then read your thoughts and responses is brilliant. Thanks for helping me expand my knowledge just that much more sir. Can't wait to watch this community really blossom and flourish.

Anonymous

This space is already everything I wanted it to be. Colin I think you're going to make this into something special.

Anonymous

As a Brit it's fascinating to read all of this, great start to CLS.

Anonymous

The French election will be really interesting. The Dutch election at least provides some hope that not all anti-immigrant voices in Europe will have support. <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/15/dutch-election-results-geert-wilders-andmark-rutte-vie-power/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/15/dutch-election-results-geert-wilders-andmark-rutte-vie-power/</a>

Anonymous

Awesome insight. Personally I don't like what Glenn Beck is doing here. The claim that there isn't a constitutional argument for pro-life is absurd. However, I find it a little sad that only a couple weeks ago she posted a video talking about the intellectual inclusion of the right and now she seems to be getting ostracized for her ideas. She is not my favorite and I definitely don't think she is the smartest conservative but I wish the party would challenge her, as a friend. Maybe as Colin noted there is some other things going on behind the scenes.

Chris B

This replacement of ACA is going to be one of the most difficult things I've watched unfold in politics. No matter which side these politicians are on, they refuse to find middle ground. This is only compounded when the rules are attacking the insurance companies themselves. The one thing that has always had me curious in the healthcare/health insurance struggle, is when certain ceos of insurance companies are trying the keep their million dollar salaries. (Sorry for the tangent) These were some great articles.

Anonymous

Irritates me too. I'm not a fan of Lahren but I hope she sticks to her guns and doesn't apologize for her political views. Politics are meant to be discussed and argued so that we either ground ourselves in our beliefs or find new perspectives that ultimately change our view.

Michael Renner

I agree with you about how both the left and right should celebrate some common ground. There should be more voices like her that don't fit the "mold". Colin has said before, "You can't put me in a box". I'm confused why you would be "glad to see her lose some air time..." I don't agree with the idea that she should be ostracized for expressing her opinion. You have a choice in what media you consume. Nobody owns her. I think this may be the reason behind Colin's Last Stand.

Johnathan McConnell

Love the list, I'd like to see more on those first thee topics you proposed.

Anonymous

Honestly, getting curated news articles along with your opinion is worth the Patreon pledge to me. I'm a long time fan, keep up the great work!

Anonymous

Thanks for this cool News Update Colin. I like you have no idea who this new Trumpcare is for, like you said it fixes nothing and goes after his base the most. It’s things like this and his budget are the reasons why the democrats thought they had this election in the bag. They care only for themselves and the rich, yet they still get votes so I don't see why they need to change the people rather be able to speak their minds over affordable healthcare so let them have. While I find the some on the left annoying they aren't really taking away freedom of speech the way the right say they are no one is dying and those who lose their jobs for it get a new job offered a new job some someone anyway. I wish sides could both come closer to the middle but for me I’d still rather have sin/soda tax over not having affordable healthcare and social programs that benefit millions and wont lower my taxes more than a few dollars because Military spending is going up anyway.

Anonymous

on the healthcare issue- "I'm optimistic that none of my members, in the end, want to be responsible for the status quo on Obamacare," said McConnell. This seems like a scary justification for implementing something that looks much worse upon closer inspection. Using the logic that one should be scared away from a system that they dont like right into the arms of one that will make their lives even worse reminds me of the snake that catches simple fish by using its midsection to startle the fish into its mouth. Interestingly, it seems like the people who will suffer the most will be the ones who really need it the most. The poorest will lose coverage, that`s it. I wonder if some of the places that supported Donald and the republican party will change their minds when some of them inevitably feel the impact this will have on their lives.

Anonymous

Awesome! Wasn't expecting to get a brief glimpse of how Colin is feeling about current events. Must have missed that this will be a thing. Very excited for it. Re: The Repubs are going to screw up with Trumpcare. They're going to put in Obamacare Lite, then when it inevitably fails, because that's what Obamacare is going to do, it will be the repubs fingerprints on it now. I can see MSNBC already "The ACA was working perfect, 600 billion people got insurance for free and everything was great, then the repubs gutted it and completely remade it and now it's failing..."

Matthew Compton

I find the fact that since Glenn Beck is friends with a huge Atheist like Penn Jillet, who he strongly disagrees on many issues, it is hypocritical for him to suspend her. This is heavily unfortunate and I wish her the best.

Anonymous

The problem is if we abandon the 2 party system (which sounds great) we'll end up with the republican primaries... except it will be the actual election. 15 candidates where someone gets 25% to 30% of the vote and then they're your leader? Doesn't sound appealing either. Plus, it would take a constitutional amendment and an overall of the electoral college.

Anonymous

Trump says that failing to back the GOP healthcare bill would hurt them in the midterm elections but isn't this logic flawed? Wouldn't a broken healthcare bill that passes and causes millions to lose insurance be their demise in the midterm elections?

Anonymous

Question about the Gorsuch hearing... is there any legal ramification or otherwise preventing a candidate from just saying what he thinks the panel wants to hear? I'm not suggesting that's what happened on that answer, but I'm just curious what would happen if a judge lied or misled the panel in order to get confirmed. Once he's confirmed, is there any form of punishment if he turns around and rules opposite to what he says in the hearing?

Anonymous

There was a pretty heated back-and-forth on Maher's overtime segment this past week regarding the lack of a bench in the democratic party. Maher recommended Gavin Newsom and was rightly told that a pretty boy from California won't win back Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan. It's like you what you said about the media, Colin. They haven't learned their lesson. Instead of doing some self reflection, they continue to use the same talking points they beat to death in 2016. Democrats are doing the same. Picking some clean cut rich elite-type from the coast won't win in 2020.

Ty Dame

Love this content! This is what I've wanted from you since I started following you pre PS4 launch back at IGN. Keep it up dude! I'm no sure I agree with your stance on the health bill though. I thought there was some pretty good changes in there.

Chris B

I see it being overturned as well, and I'm pro choice. What I would like to see is it become a states choice and put it on the ballot to let the commoners decide.

Anonymous

Regarding Healthcare: It scares the hell out of me. As someone with a pre-existing condition I am highly concerned about how this whole thing will shake out. I did not get subsidies with Obamacare legislation due to my tax bracket however, that doesn't discount the fact that if they repeal it entirely I could be totally screwed. I'm not asking for healthcare hand outs, I just don't want to be forced to work my entire life simply because of the way healthcare was structured in the US (need healthcare you need to have a job if you have a Pre-existing condition). Otherwise companies won't cover me for a reasonable cost.

Anonymous

Just out of curiosity and it's fine if you don't answer. Did you have healthcare pre ACA?

Anonymous

Before ACA I was covered under my now ex-wife's plan and before that I had my own coverage when I worked jobs...

Anonymous

“The Democrats Have a Leadership Void” I think it is important to note “45% said they would like to see someone not on the list.” If I were a part of the DNC I would put Tulsi Gabbard’s name out there. I am biased towards Veterans but she endorsed Burnie Sanders and could likely capitalize on his voters as long as he doesn’t run again (he shouldn't). She is a good representation of the multiculturalism/diversity/equality the DNC tenants, and could instead focus on a more resounding message that might draw in Independents and moderates such as 1920’s Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover’s Cooperative Government model (used and ultimately lost against Secretary of Treasury Andrew Melon’s Laisse Faire model, which arguably led to the Great Depression) with the message being “use regulation to further competition within the market place (stabilizing housing prices, creating more jobs, etc.) while protecting the environment and dealing with Climate Change.” I disagree with this but it would be a good strategy, although whether this would be more useful in 2020 or 2024 remains to be seen. Warren is too Clintonesque, Michelle Obama’s only political experience is as an Assistant Mayor of Chicago and First Lady and I doubt people really want to see an Obama Dynasty, Clinton would be foolish to run again after everything that came out during this election cycle, and I don’t see Mark Cuban pulling a populist run similar to Trump’s. To address Colin’s point about the power shift though; There tends to be a natural balance to power in our 2 party system. When Bush (43) was president the senate house and others swung Dem, with Obama they swung republican albeit furthered due to the historical ACA. I think regardless of President Trump’s performance the mid-term election will see Dems gain ground back, to what degree will depend on his performance. “Tomi Lahren Imploding?” The “Right” (quotes because I am painting with a large brush stroke and know this statement will not be indicative of all persons/organizations who lean right) has used the term “Facts over Feelings” quite a lot. However the reaction thus far seems far more indicative of the criticism they leverage at the left being a self-devouring snake. First, she spoke for herself not anyone else, she also goes on to make a very reasoned argument that because of her view as a constitutionalist and wanting a small government she thinks it would be hypocritical for her to suggest the government have control over what someone does with their own body. Regardless of (dis)agreeing with her, she makes a solid argument. Second,the next question of “When is a fetus a baby, and when should that be given consideration?” is not addressed. It is sad to see an attack on a person when the attack should targeted at the idea being presented.

Anonymous

Really liking this type of content! As someone who lives in the UK i'm very interested in learning more about foreign politics - thanks for giving me some reading for the evening :)

Anonymous

There's no telling what happened. Maybe he's being intolerant and got rid of her, maybe her show is just suspended and will come back... Maybe he brought her in to talk to her about it, or explain how being pro-life is protecting the "Life" part of "Life, Liberty, Pursuit of happiness" and she flipped out on him and caused a scene so she got fired/suspended. There's really no telling. It's all speculation until we hear more. I listen to Glenn probably a day / week or 2 weeks and he is very tolerant of his employees disagreeing with him. It seems out of character that he would fire her just for being pro choice, but again, obviously I don't know.

Anonymous

The Tomi situation seems a little ridiculous. I don't particularly like her views but for people to turn on her because her opinion is off of the party mark I believe is ridiculous. No one is going to agree 100% on all platforms

Anonymous

Ok that makes sense. It is just hard for me to get over the fact that I am paying more for my insurance to support someone else. Not you in particular.

Anonymous

While I agree 100% on the Toni situation being ridiculous, I also see why the Blaze would let her go. She has come at odds with their viewership and it's not like they are trying to be an unbiased news site. They clearly have an agenda and Tomi doesn't fit that agenda anymore.

Anonymous

Yea I would love to read Colin's perception on the "Alt Right". As a long time anti-establishment Repub, I started hearing Alt Right and assumed that meant me.. the people on the right who aren't happy with the spineless, democrat-lite repubs that we get... but then other anti-establishment people started warning of the alt right. It seems they're more like the "progressives" of the right. The people that the Dems have tried to paint Repubs as for years... but now they're here (supposedly). I still don't know anyone who considers themselves alt right. Lauren Southern used to say she was, but I don't think she knows what it means. Milo says he is, and he might be, but I took it more as being more Nazi-ish, like the authoritarian right, not the libertarian right... but that's just a guess.

ScKeptiC17

I find the Tomi story interesting, simply because I don't understand the incessant need for the parties to constantly be aligned on an issue that has many constraints to be aligned on. While I don't personally believe abortion is the best option, that's a personal belief coming from being a man from the outside looking in. It's not for me to decide what choice best suits a woman - there could be 100 different reasons not discussed enough on why she wants to have the procedure done. So I side with Tomi, not just on the principal on government poking their head in a space it doesn't belong, but more so that no one should feel that have that much say to determine what others should be doing with their personal choices.

Anonymous

As for the replacement of the ACA, I think this could be a momentous opportunity for Rand to step up big. He has been an outspoken critic of Ryan's plan and if it all goes south for Ryan then Trump will distance himself from the whole mess. That would allow Rand's plan a chance to see light. If he brought together both sides in a replacement bill that worked he would be the biggest republican period. Who better to run in 2020?

Anonymous

You're probably correct in that they don't want to have her at odds with their viewership. It just seems that Colin is right and there is something else there. That or Beck is lying about appreciating views that oppose his own.

Chris Eboli

The 'all or nothing' approach to politics is dangerous, and I feel this is unfortunate for Tomi. It's this new way of politics which will ensure there are no true centrists who can be serious contenders for presidency in the near future.

RoughSlpr

As a Liberal, I have no problem with this SC pick. We have a Conservative president and honestly, it could be A LOT worse. I would much rather have Garland of course but I'm not holding my breath. IMO, the GOP will come out worse by 2020 at the rate it's going unless the bulk of it starts vocally standing up to Trump. Less than 100 days in and he's already the most unpopular president in modern history at this place and I don't possibly see what he could do that will change this. I know you believe a moderate will be the Democrats best chances at revitalizing their party but I respectfully disagree. Half the base plus a huge chunk of independents who weren't able to participate in the Democratic primaries want someone like Bernie. Who by the way is most likely still the most popular politician in the country. The party desperately needs to new blood though and I hope they start grooming someone soon. Overall, like you I hope a third party emerges and takes the practical ideas from both sides. As for the rise in populism in Europe, it seems to be declining and it looks as of now that France will be spared. The citizens of these nations both Conservative and Liberal just want their culture sustained which is completely understandable. It's a damn shame that our meddling in the Middle East is having direct negative effects on our allies.

Anonymous

What exactly are the changing? If you have a preferred website that summarized it nicely I'll take that. Last I heard it was keeping the mandate and the pre existing condition clause... so it was basically Obamacare Lite. Are they changing other things? Or am I wrong on the mandate/pre existing condition thing? That was a while back so it may have been speculation being presented as news (I know, i know, that never happens... lol)

Atlas522

For those interested in Le Pen here's a great short podcast with Daniel Hannan, the British writer and politician, discussing her and other populist European leaders: <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/burning-issues-man-address/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://ricochet.com/podcast/burning-issues-man-address/</a> He makes a great point on how she's actually further to the left on economic issues than the actual French Socialist party is. Definitely worth a listen.

Phil Crone

Inactivity could look just as bad. You have the both houses and the president and you couldn't pass ANYTHING?! Rock and a hard place.

Phil Crone

There's a lot of administrative bloat for sure in health insurance companies. I work in one and I see it. That said, a lot of that bloat is of the governent's own making. We have to not only file financials with GAAP accounting, we also have to file with the federal DOI and any state we do business in, which - I'm at a Big 5 - is basically all 50. We do maintain an absurdly large staff (about 50k employees IIRC)... In my estimation, that's our biggest bloat, and I don't have a great answer how to change it.

Jeremy Meyer

More importantly, how will Gorsuch rule on the issue of Wonder Woman's armpit hair? Shaved, I believe, is clearly super precedent.

Anonymous

You're right about Tami Lahren. There's got to be more to the story. Glenn has stated numerous times that just because you believe something is wrong that doesn't mean it's unconstitutional. He's normally speaking about his own faith and attacks on Christianity, but it applies in this case as well.

Anonymous

I don't think my last comment posted so if it did and I'm just not seeing I apologize for the spam. Gorsuch's stance doesn't surprise me in the slightest. I researched his ruling history when it was announced he was Trump's SC pick and didn't see any opinions regarding Roe. Trump had previously said he was pro-life and would return the issue back to the states. He must not have meant it and used that line to try to get more evangelical voters on his side. That's what populist do, though, so I can't say that I am surprised. If Glenn Beck suspended Tom Lahren for her pro-choice views then that would be really disappointing. I am pro-life, but I am also a big proponent of free speech. While I understand it is Glenn's company and he can suspend whoever he wants for whatever reason he wants but if her declaring a pro-choice viewpoint got her suspended then that's a bad look. Perhaps there is more to this story behind the scenes. I actually gained some respect for Glenn Beck during the past election season. I was formerly a Republican, but Trump does not represent my views, so I left the party. Right-wing media personalities who had publicly opposed him took a big risk in losing a large chunk of their audience. I applaud Glenn for what he did, but if he suspended Lahren for her differing viewpoint, he comes off as a hypocrite. Thanks for the platform Colin! Everyone has been really respectful from the conversations I have seen. Great job everyone!

Fred Bence

I'll need to read these after work, but I did look into the Tomi story last night and 100% agree. Way more going on behind the scenes.

Anonymous

Oh the healthcare issue, Tom Woods just had a really good episode of his show yesterday on that subject that's worth checking out. Here's the link for it. <a href="https://youtu.be/on2x55w5utY" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/on2x55w5utY</a>

Anonymous

While I agree that what's happening to Tomi Lahren is for a messed up reason. I can't bring myself to feel any sympathy for her. Maybe I'm wrong for that.

Anonymous

Hey Colin love the topics you chose! Personally I find it hilarious how quickly the Democratic party has warped in on itself and the fact that they no longer have a clear leader looking forward. This especially comes true in their selection for their DNC chair (Tom Perez) as well as the re-election of Pelosi as the minority leader of the House.

Anonymous

I agree with you about Glen Beck. I am also historically republican but have been getting more libertarian over time. I think Glen handled the election really well regardless of how I felt about him before hand. I have a feeling that there's a lot more to this than is currently visible.

Nick Griffiths

To not acknowledge a link between the Brexit vote, Trump victory, rise in anti-establishment parties elsewhere in Europe is of course wrong but nevertheless I still find it tough to see le Pen make it over the line. The Brexit vote had a decent section of the centre right English vote (always anti EU) combine with (typically) left wing disillusioned northern Labour vote to get it beyond 50%. Indeed most of the confidence in the Brexit losing came from the assumption of the late swing to status quo as seen in Quebec etc. Trump could rely on a core republican vote that despised Hilary to turn out reluctantly. In France, unless it is a left / far left candidate running against her, I don't see where the 50% comes from. Let's not forget, if the US did use a PR system then Trump didn't win by quite a margin.

Anonymous

First time posting here or joining patron for that mattee and I just wanted to say you are destined for great things Colin. I'm sure you already know that with how many folks are echoing the sentiment. I just decided myself to after 8 years of working within the DC machine to step out and take a break but being from Queens NY, young, gay, and conservative (conservatarian?) I very much look forward to this community and seeing where it goes.

Anonymous

Re: Roe v Wade - I think Colin is largely right. As precedent Roe is probably on sturdy ground. Gorsuch did elude to a willingness to overturn it, which in fidelity with the legal circumstances may be wise. Morally it's an entirely different discussion. I do think based on the facts of the case when it was first ruled on and how the past 40 or so years have gone as a society we would be well served to reopen the discussion on when life gains protections because I think a clear majority of Americans favor something between the extreme edges and the issue could be put to rest with honest debate. Though what would politicians have to wedge themselves into relevance then? ;)

Anonymous

Thanks for the post on day 2, great to catch up on somethings going on around the world and in our country. Simply Roe vs Wade shouldn't and probably won't be touched. The new healthcare law seems like it makes things worse. Obamacare needs some change but this isn't the way to go about it. And Tomi Lahren doesn't deserve to be treated like that for that opinion in particular, she has said other things that i disagree with but even then i wouldn't ask for her show to be pulled off a network. Thanks Colin for sharing these on day 2, also I know you might not see this but love to hear your opinions on the NASA bill signed by the President.

four24twenty

Abortions will remain federally legal no doubt. The real question is whether Planned Parenthood will continue to receive federal funding down the road. I have no idea what kind of political views Mark Cuban has, but I imagine he could hold his own on the debate stage.

Dan Phillips

I don't understand the feelings that if someone associates themselves as a conservative that they need to follow party line on every topic. Are people not entitled to their own opinions? I don't get why Tomi would be getting heat for her comments. The other articles are interesting as well. Thank you for posting these Colin. Much appreciated.

Phil Crone

I've always wondered why an organization that does the exact same thing as PP except offer abortions hasn't risen up just to fill that gap of non-controversial but providing affordable services for women. Maybe it's just impossible to justify morally.

Phil Crone

Speaking of the Middle East - The "creation" of Israel in 1948 would be an excellent topic to explore on CLS. While the U.S. is still one Israel's greatest allies, I think at least some of the motivation surrounding western hatred by the Middle East comes from Israel which, to the best of my knowledge, was a "joint effort" post-WWII.

Anonymous

Certainly self identified conservatives should not feel obligated to pull the GOP line. There are long standing tensions between the conservative wing and the more liberal sects of the party.

Anonymous

Roe v. Wade won't be "overturned". If it did come before a conservative court, what would happen would be, in the event that there isn't a constitution amendment, would be to turn the decision over to the states. If you want to see what that would look like, i would highly recommend you read Scalia's dissent in the Obergefell decision

Anonymous

In regards to Tomi Lahren. I think her employer has any and every right in regards to content it desires to present. If you want to present different content and that has not be approved, well don't be surprised when your employer shows you the door. That is business.

Anonymous

However, - sorry, hit enter by mistake - goes with post above, she is more than able to do exactly what you did. Start her own company and post content that she, in her sole capacity, believes in. I assume from everything you have posted and talked about, its been a true boon to your life, no?

Anonymous

I think your '' eluded to it but for the sake of clarity by overturn I think most apply as giving it back to THE states. I know there's a vocal group seeking outright ban or something along those lines but states rights tends to be the average.

Anonymous

think Le Pen will probably not win. For those who don't know, the French elections are on a two-round system: the two candidates who fared the best in the first round go head-to-head in the second round. Right now, the three leading candidates (in order) are Le Pen with the FN, Macron with En Marche and Fillon with the Republicans. Le Pen is a populist nationalist, Macron is a neoliberal moderate, and Fillon is a right-leaning centrist (while he is not nearly as staunch on immigration as Le Pen, he is a significant shift rightward on those types of issues from the French status quo). For Le Pen to actually be president, she not only has to be in the top two candidates (she will win the first round), she has to win the second round head-to-head. This seems highly unlikely whether it is Fillon or Macron--if it was her against a hard-leftist, one might see the moderate center begrudgingly choosing her, but the left and moderate coalition will coalesce around Macron and will prefer Fillon worst case scenario (I also think a lot of voters who would have voted Le Pen against Macron will vote Fillon against Le Pen given the opportunity, as he seems less radical overall). I think ultimately, the Trumpian/Le Pen nationalist sentiment in Western countries has a high floor and low ceiling, meaning there are probably 20-30% of the population who is hardcore pro-Trump/Le Pen but in a best case that type of candidate can only reliably pull in the low 40s of the electorate (I think it is obvious that had Trump and Clinton had a two-way runoff, the third party voters would have pushed Clinton over the top in most swing states he won). So Le Pen is really hamstrung by this. The other interesting tidbit about the French election is Fillon and what has happened to him. For those unaware, Fillon, who looked like a potential favorite early in the race, has been pretty savagely torn apart by the French media for various scandals. It should also be noted that Macron's party is brand new and he is polling surprisingly well given how new the party is. Assuming the neoliberal/Brussels crowd is behind this, it seems like a calculated move to ensure the continuation of centrist pro-capitalist neoliberal rule in France. They probably are willing to take their chances on putting Le Pen through to the second round (probably a safe risk on their part), and even though Fillon is the lesser of two evils to them, he is still sufficiently anti-Islam and euroskeptic that they would rather get Macron through. I guess it is sort of like Democrats hoping Trump would shake up the Republican primaries and then ultimately lose, or at least win them but ultimately lose to Clinton (they seemed to shift their position as they saw people coalesce more around him). Like in the domestic example, this is a clever strategy unless it backfires, which it did in the US, but I doubt will in France.

Anonymous

I think with the predictions your basically spot on. Le Pen pulling off the second round would take a pretty seismic shift from what the polling suggests but I have to hedge my bet q bit and say given the built in bias within these polling methodologies it's entirely possible her support is higher than we're seeing. I did work tangentially with Kellyanne Conways polling company this last go around and for those of us seeing the private polls Trumps rust belt support was not nearly the surprise it was for the rest of the country. When we looked at swing counties like Hillsborough FL (Tampa) his strength was clear. I bring it up bc I think the floor/cieling analogy is flawed when comparing election candidates - much of that positioning comes from rhetoric and politics not policy. On strict policy i would suggest things like immigration reform, mild protectionism, and a shift from DC to local governance are not limited by a low cieling. Trumps personal cieling I think is somewhere in the mid 50's to possibly even low 60's if the discussion is strictly on policy. Once personal politics get mixed in and the playing field shifts back against him (by virtue of sporting the R, not excusing him personally) his cieling drops toward where you put it IMHO.

Anonymous

I think your right, Macron is going to win the election (probably). The Front National will effectively be the largest party but of course defeated by a coalition of voters. I recently listened to The Spectator podcast in which they shared the same sentiment but also added that Le Pen is playing the long game and is anticipating a stronger chance of victory in four years time. Central Europe is a different animal to the UK or the US, you won't see a domino effect as the situations are completely different on the ground, things will move a lot slower in Europe. If not for the scandal I think Fillion would have been a red hot favourite for victory, he was seen as a compromise that France probably needed rather than shifting further right, just to add, I don't really think Le Pen is far right, not in the sense that Wilders was.

Anonymous

While I think abortion going to the states is a good idea on paper, but living in Ohio where they show strong disdain to the idea of abortion in the state government, it scares me what it can do to women's rights and in turn their lives.

Anonymous

I agree, it almost seems like the Democratic Party was so confident they were going to win the presidential election, they were and are still in a state of shock from losing. In this state of shock they seem to think that their usual rhetoric is still applicable at the national stage. I also agree that I do not see them winning with a JFK-esque candidate. However I think that the reason an individual of that caliber would not succeed stands more at the primary stage than it would with the general election. I do not believe that the Democratic Party stands at a level to elect this clean-cut type of candidate over one like that of Elizabeth Warren.

Anonymous

Talking about health care. Here in Brazil we have a fuck up health sistem, we are taxed so that we have public hospitals that barely are open, so we have to pay for health insurance that is expensive as fuck, not as much as in US, but our economy is in a way worst shape. What obamacare proposed is a step in the wrong direction but with the right mind, I do believe in public health, but only as long as the state can give a quality one, as that is basicaly impossible to create out of the blue, some sort of middle way plan is necessary. Trump and his administration are basicaly trying to half bake a plan that will most likely be denied so he will be able to be "shielded" putting the blame on others. This bill is most likely an answer to the conservative party, but also in the wrong direction. This is simply but a bad step, they should pull back saying that they hear the public and take their time to write a proper bill. Hopefully this will create a opening to improve the hole public health care ideal.

Luke

I agree Colin, cannot wait to see how the Tomi Lahren story develops. I actually have always liked her, just because she seems extremely real and gets her point across. What is happening to her is completely bullshit and I feel so sorry for her. Have a great day!

Justis Salazar

I really like this; news I need to know about from a creator/intellectual whose opinion I trust, companied with honest and fair discussion - all in one place and as a community. So good.

Anonymous

Colin, as a man I understand that I can never fully understand what it's like to have to carry a baby for nine months, nor do I know the toll that it would take on someone's body or the potential risks associated with it. The philosophical dilemma that I run into with abortion however, is to me it seems like humans playing god (I'm not religious), which is something I strongly object to. To me the question has never been when is the fetus conscious, when is it "alive" it's been, should any other person have control over my fate? I understand the position that plenty of women's eggs go unfertilized but it doesn't change my thoughts on the matter. In my mind when conception occurs that cell is granted the same rights as everyone else. It can't be "undone." I know you said your opinion changed on the matter, what specifically changed your perspective?

Anonymous

I've always been on both sides of the pro-life/pro-choice issue cause that's a woman's choice but also I think " what will become of that child once it's born"?

Josh in Tampa

I find the French election very interesting. Within the last month or so 60 minutes had a good interview with Marine Le Pen. As Colin said, this election is yet another huge bell weather. With massive polling errors with Brexit and Trump I feel like she stands a good chance of winning. This would be the latest sign of a shift towards populism and maybe the death knell for the EU. I would advise anyone interested in this election to seek out 60 minutes interview with her. Very interesting no matter what side you fall on. I've begun following this election closer than any foreign election in my life.

Anonymous

I listened to the same episode but I didn't understand why she was suspended. I don't particularly care for her because she sounds combative and uninformed but the only reason I could come up why she was suspended was because she was so wrong on the constitutional aspect of abortion. Why do you think she was suspended ?

Anonymous

I'm on the fence too ... listening to Glenn Beck talk about the "right to life " in the Declaration of Independence has made me question my stance

Anonymous

Just finished watching Joe Rogan Experience #877 with Jordan Peterson. Fascinating individual. As a third-year university student, much of what he has to say resonates strongly with me. Even in the mathematics and engineering departments, reasonable and centred individuals have to walk on eggshells for fear of upsetting politically correct social justice warrior types.

Anonymous

I appreciate how lengthy and thought out this post was! It really shows that you are pushing quality of work into everything you do with this new venture, and I appreciate that!

Anonymous

Great post, really appreciate the effort!!!

Anonymous

Colin I love the topics. It would be great to see/hear you discuss them...I just flat out don't have time to research/read them myself so having people with differing points of view discuss them would be great to get a balanced approach. Love the detail &amp; objectivity you put into the post!

Anonymous

In re: Gorsuch article. Fantastic answer by the SCOTUS nominee. Also, I agree that Trump is a social moderate and, I would say, the least likely Republican President (of at least the last four) to ask a nominee that question. I'm always a little surprised that people are so focused on Roe when Planned Parenthood v. Casey (decided in 1992) is actually the more important case, regardless of which side of the debate you are on. Casey affirmed the essential holding of Roe (banning certain abortions is unconstitutional) but established the "undue burden" test for abortion laws. Basically, prior to viability (gone is Roe's "third trimester" approach), states cannot prohibit abortions, but may regulate abortions so long as they do not create an "undue burden" on the ability of women to obtain abortions. Although, for purposes of stare decisis, it is important to note that the essential holding dates back to Roe, in order to return this issue to the states, Casey would actually need to be addressed and overturned, not Roe. Source: my law degree. :-)

Anonymous

I don't agree with much of what Tomi has to say, however she has the right to share her opinion. I have seen to many people in my personal/professional life have their character destroyed by speaking their opinion.

Anonymous

A lot of great topics here; I look forward to reading them.

Anonymous

Technically, if the Justice lied under oath, he/she could be impeached and, if convicted, removed from office (under Article III of the Constitution), but this is highly unlikely. As a matter of decorum (and to avoid potentially having to recuse themselves later), Judges, in these confirmation proceedings, have frequently refused to give an opinion on issues or cases that may eventually come before the Court. Which may give you some insight into how likely Judge Gorsuch thinks it is that abortion will come before the Court in the near future.

GrisWold Diablo

What happen to Tomi only confirms what we all know, both extreme love to silences and turn on who ever disagrees with their opinion even if those person are on their side on most subjects. To much work to have discussion and wonder why their opinion changed. Feels like everyone are 1 comment/opinion/tweet away to be painted as the devil.

Anonymous

I'm having a lot of fun just reading the comments and seeing what other people think. The comments here are surprisingly respectful and thought out, so if you're interested in hearing differing perspectives I suggest just perusing what others in this very patreon have to say. Also I just realized that this is the first time I've ever said that I enjoyed the comments section on anything. Really glad Colin made this patreon and he hasn't even put anything out.

Ryan Berry

The Tomi Lahren stance is interesting to me because it highlights one of the fundamental flaws of the Red: they stand for less government but still look to pass moral judgement on gray-area issues. She's avoiding being hypocritical, but is getting punished for it... I'm curious what happens with the healthcare reform simply because, if it does fail, the next POTUS will also submit for reform...making it a precedent for each POTUS to reform healthcare as part of their platform. It will only continue to get more muddled as time goes on unless Washington stands to truly simplify it.

Trey Castellanos

I'm a vet student and experienced the same thing through my undergrad and currently am experiencing the same at my grad school.

Christopher Hopkins

Thank you for this post interesting topics and comments during my break at work today, 💜your faces

Anonymous

I don't think most conservatives think they're passing moral judgement when in opposition to abortion. The core of it is protecting an innocent life. The problem is it's being "incubated" in another person so the discussion is when does it become a life and at that point does the right of the innocent life to exist trump the right of the person carrying that life. It's a tough discussion but it's not really about small govt vs big govt.

Anonymous

This isn't related to the topics Colin posted but he said to feel free to post our own stories. I personally am very much an environmentalist and this story hits me on a personal level. <a href="http://apachenativeamericans.us/2017/03/minnesota-wisconsin-and-wyoming-have-decided-to-eradicate-wolves/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://apachenativeamericans.us/2017/03/minnesota-wisconsin-and-wyoming-have-decided-to-eradicate-wolves/</a> My take: this story might be biased but I don't agree that there should be a hunting season for wolves. Especially if it's true that these wolves are still an endangered species. I feel that perhaps our senators could focus on some more important issues rather than the issue with wolves in the Midwest. However, I am not an expert in this so if anyone has any insight into this please share.

Anonymous

This is such a cool idea. It gets me reading articles on things I may not normally read about. I'll definitely be checking back here consistently for new posts. Keep up the good work, Colin!

Anonymous

I think that s what's great about turning things over to the state...it gives people the option of either influencing their state govt or to move to a state that better reflects their views.

Anonymous

Regarding the topic "Democrats have a leadership void" I agree with the fact that there isn't anyone really appealing for the Democrats to campaign for. However, if you look at history you notice a pattern. After Ronald Reagan every other president was a president from the opposing party. George bush (R), Bill Clinton (D), George W. Bush (R), Barack Obama (D), Donald Trump (R). I think it may very well take 2 terms with Donald trump but whoever takes over the oval office next will be someone from the Democratic party.

Fred Bence

As someone with only business/economic knowledge (finance and economics degrees), this is the kind of information that I really look forward to in this group. I had never heard of the Casey case before this, but it does change how you view the importance of Roe v Wade in the bigger picture.

Anonymous

This is absolutely fantastic to see this type of response. Reasonable, respectful, thought provoking conversation. I know Dems might have a leadership issue but I do think of all folks Bernie has a shot in 2020. A good portion of the population he was courting (younger millennials) will be far more active in the political realm and not just slapping a #Bernie on the twitter feed and calling it "support". If he can reign in some of his more outlandish and extravagant proposals there may yet be some potential. The age factor and how far left he moves/stays over the next few years will be of interest is well. Just keep in mind he had a platform of younger people who are notoriously fickle with continued support and showing up to polls really rally for him. Couple this with the fact he will arguably (again) have the largest voting/population sector (millennials) in his corner and it really could be interesting.

Hose A Contra Razz

I'm pro-life, my wife had an abortion when we were together for 2 months I was against it, she was also prolife but was afraid and thought she had no choice. She has a bad experience at parenthood when she went though it, she developed a mental disorder bipolar because of it, going , people don't know the risk of having an abortion can do their mind, going though this my wife have meet many women who had abortions and are not mentally stable, I don't know what the solution is but a life was lost that day my wife had an abortion and she still cries till this day because she feels she killed her baby. She said they gave her an ultrasound the day it happens but would not let her hear the or see the heart beat, she said if she would of seen it she would of not had one. It's been 15 years now and she feels the affect of it, I do not wish a mental disorder on anyone it's the worst especially if it's your spouse.

Fred Bence

It's odd that my initial thoughts were that there seem to be a lot of similarities between the Tomi story and Trump threatening Congress for their vote on Trumpcare. Not in exact terms, but Trump is fairly similar to Glenn Beck in the sense that he can threaten and "fire" these representatives (affect their ability to get re-elected) for not agreeing to his platform, just like Tomi didn't agree with Beck's views on abortion and what she was representing on The Blaze. She has the right to believe what she wants. If an employer believes that someone isn't representing their company in the manor they want, they have the right to release that employee, but it's unfortunate (I don't believe in it, especially with politics, but I've seen it plenty of times in the business world). Tomi should pull a Colin and go out on her own. She'll have one hell of a following. Also, in terms of Trump's threats of re-election for Congress, or lack there of, I feel like I'm watching an episode of House of Cards haha except all of these threats would be behind the scenes!

Anonymous

Regarding Tomi Lahren. It's really lame that she got suspended. Suspending someone because they say something you don't agree with is the absolute worst. I'm pro-life so I don't agree with her, and I don't really see her limited government argument as relevant because it's a purely ethical issue. That's like saying the government should stay out of murder. Now I'm not the person that pickets abortion clinics and yells at people that abortion is murder, but I do believe in protecting innocent life which I believe the fetus is.

Anonymous

There's much more to the Tomi Lahren story, guaranteed. She'll go to Fox and buddy up with Tucker Carlson and they'll yell about things together.

Anonymous

The fact that Gorsuch is even being considered is mind boggling. Congress for the first time ever did not even hear the President's nomination for a vacant seat in SCOTUS. This is a terrible precedent, that whenever either party feels the need to get a judge for "their side" they can literally just ignore a pick and wait months or who knows how long till a more friendly judge can be picked. Merrick Garland should have been confirmed months ago, instead we played political games to make SCOTUS just another branch of government ruined by partisan politics.

Prince Borutski

I took an interest in this story, but felt that I needed more information. I found this article describing the situation from a Toronto news outlet:<a href="http://www.metronews.ca/news/world/2017/02/26/midwest-wyoming-lawmakers-target-wolf-protections-again.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://www.metronews.ca/news/world/2017/02/26/midwest-wyoming-lawmakers-target-wolf-protections-again.html</a> I do not believe that any struggling species should be hunted for trophies. I sincerely hope that any change in legislation will not cause wolves to become eradicated. The above article presents the opposite angle, where the cattle farmers are worrying about their livestock. The specific situation in the midwest is unfamiliar to me, so I cannot weigh in on the validity of these farmer's concerns. I hope that the experts come to a holistically beneficial solution.

Eric Iverson

Tomi is proof that the outrage machine and contempt for free speech exists on both sides of the fence. I appreciate people like Dave Rubin's commentary on the "regressive left", but by no means is the right any better.... in any way. Tomi created an audience of outrage, and it was only a matter of time before it ate her alive. It's sad to see, but for a person like her, and the way she chose to be a champion of division and bombast, it is fitting.

Eric Iverson

Also... love these little news updates, Colin. A way to discuss current events with the audience without having to make a video. I hope you will continue it!

Anonymous

I could get very used to this. Love your grounded thoughts on political news. Thanks.

Anonymous

I understand that Obamacare is fundamentally flawed, but I fear that completely destroying it is going to leave a lot of people exposed. My girlfriend (23 year old college student, mother passed away/dad out of the picture) has coverage from Obamacare and she's healthy, but she's heading to grad school as soon as she graduates with her BS next June, and she's not going to have a real full time job for several more years. If there is not an Obamacare-like system in place, is there any way for her to get health care, or is she screwed? It's something I worry about a lot but I'm not educated enough on the subject to fully understand.

Anonymous

I hate to hear that anyone has to go thru what you and your wife went thru.

Anonymous

I'd just like to say Colin that even though CLS is only a day old it feels like a huge hit. This one post has already generated over 350 comments and all the ones I've looked it are respectful and thought provoking and I already feel like I have gotten my money's worth. The one thing I will add though is that patreon does not really seem like the past platform for lengthy discussions like these, so maybe it would be worth finding another platform to post great news blasts in the future

Brandon Kirkman

I know I'm late to the party, but it took some time to digest this. I've been googling, reading, and watching videos. This channel has already largely expanded my knowledge of politics. This is the first time I was cognoscente of another countries election. And I thought "damn! They got girl trump in the running!" Then Colin's passage pointed out the same!! Loving this!

Dustin Kline

Might be a dumb question and be completely irrelevant, but whose fault is it that the dems are in the state they find them selves in currently? Obama? Hillary? The supporters thrmselves? Media? Would just like an indepth understanding of how they got where they are.

Anonymous

If posts like these are regular, this is worth my 5 dollars by itself. I check Reuters regularly, but having all these different sources coralled into one place with a summation of the issues from a mind I really respect is SO refreshing. Thanks for this!

Anonymous

I am honestly loving all of this right now. Having this news feed everyday is so refreshing. I'm in college right now so I am moving around a lot and I'm just happy to see that I can get my news and see people's opinions on different things. Even putting my opinions about these topics makes me very happy. Also I know Colin probably won't see this but dude you inspired me to change my major to political science and sparked my passion into the field. I can't wait to see your videos and learn new things from you twice a week! Thank you so much for this!

Anonymous

My gamer husband always forced me to listen to Kinda Funny podcasts in the car. I didn't care for them much at first but then I started to really listen. After a while I noticed that one of the speakers opinions always resonated with me. Colin, the voice of reason, so down to earth and impressively knowledgeable. I had no idea who he was or what he looked like - but damn it he was awesome! And though I tried to hide my new appreciation for the podcasts, it was obvious to my husband that I too had become a fan. We always commented on how intelligent and well versed Colin was, and we knew it wouldn't be long before he spread his wings towards a new venture geared more towards his passions. He has inspired both my husband and I to become more in tune with politics and the world around us. We have never supported anyone on Patreon before - but look at us now! We support you Colin!

Anonymous

I agree about the convenience of having the top political stories handpicked by Colin - the articles seem to be excellent quality. That's awesome! Colin has definitely inspired me to become more in tune with politics as well!

Anonymous

I'm a huge supporter of repealing Obamacare but the half ass repeal that's on the table right now isn't good enough. I'm glad that some Republicans are standing their ground on a full repeal, even if it may never happen. The Trump Care bill is a waste of time, and I hope it gets killed quickly.

Anonymous

Yes she can still buy healthcare without Obamacare. Although, most of the time full time students can get all the healthcare they need from their university. If the health insurance market was truly a free market, her health insurance would be dirt cheap due the fact that she's young and healthy. Unfortunately, when government meddles in free markets, prices always rise.

Anonymous

Totally agree with you here. She has lived by the sword and may die by the sword.

Anonymous

Free markets can make healthcare more affordable. Why have costs in electronics gone down so much compared to healthcare?

Anonymous

Working overseas I am out of the loop most of the time (by choice). However, this is rather refreshing and feels somewhat productive. I don't have anything to contribute to the conversation, but I want to thank Colin for providing something to read/think about and hopefully educate me further - to be able to participate in these discussions later.

Cole Britt

Damn Colin (and supporters)...y'all have really tapped into something special. This community has huge potential to be a place with so many different opinions and everyone (so far) seems to be able to have meaningful conversations about this stuff without getting personal. Unreal. I've never seen a community like this...there may be others out there, but I've never heard of them. This is great. 😎

Anonymous

This is great guys, feels like I'm back in school again. Never been fully engaged in politics, so I'm gonna put my best forward to keep up with the material Colin posts and the discussion you guys have here and hopefully someday down the line, be as informed as most of you guys in here. Love that so many different perspectives are already here and everyone being completely respectful to each other. The exact opposite of YouTube comments. Now if only we could get our government to work like this. Going to make it a habit to be on here once a day. This is dope!

Anonymous

Fascinating reads Colin. Keep these coming!

Cayne McIver

This weeks BBC Inquiry is all about France's shift to the right. If you don't have much time to read but can listen to things (like me) then this will give you some great insight as to why Marine Le Pen is getting so popular. Enjoy! <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04wsf9z" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04wsf9z</a>

Anonymous

Colin's news burst makes my crotch burst in happiness... thank you for informing us C MO, can't wait for new news burts

Anonymous

Hey Colin M, Big fan. As someone who is pro-life, I am realistic about Roe V Wade. My stance has always been that I would like to see it go away, but I want that to be because as a Nation we came together and decided that we didn't want it anymore. However, I don't believe it's 'bullet-proof'. For example, I think gay marriage is safe because at the end of the day I don't think anyone can come up with a compelling enough argument for why tax paying American citizens can't marry who they want, it gets to granular. The 'silver bullet' for the abortion debate is the life of the child. I'm sympathetic to the idea of not wanting to restrict a woman's autonomy, but I'm obviously more concerned with how the child in this debate isn't acknowledged much at all. Sure I understand that most pro-choice advocates don't believe an unborn child is a 'human being', and while I'll listen to that point, I think there is a clear and logical cut off point for that argument. Like maybe you don't believe a child is alive 1 day after conception, but what about 1 week? 4 weeks? 8 weeks? 24 weeks? 1 week before delivery? I'm also curious to see where the debate goes when medical technology gets to a point where a child can be carried to term without the birth mother. Sorry for the long post, but I'd be excited, and happy to civilly discuss this with anyone who wants to.

Tyler Bello

I hope for the first few videos we can go to child like vocabulary for a bit this is all so new to me and I know your pretty well invested in this world but I want to care I just don't know what any of this is.. I had to look up Roe V Wade.. lol

Zachary T Eldridge

I've never understood the hostility against pro lifers like us. I'm not anti woman, I just thinks it's sad that some children don't get a chance to live. I certainly don't aim blame at the women who choose not to remain pregnant. I've never been in their shoes. It's not an easy choice.

Atlas522

That's the Senate's prerogative - they don't have to hold a hearing for a SCOTUS appointee. Congress and the executive branch are two separate and coequal branches of the government. The Senate can do whatever it likes in regards to appointments to the Supreme Court. Here's a good journal going much further into these details: <a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol29_No1_White.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol29_No1_White.pdf</a>

Anonymous

I'm pro-choice, but I'm finding increasingly difficult to accept a 22-week cap. Studies have shown that 92% of abortions occur within the first 13-weeks(That's just over 3-months), so my hope would be that we could lower the limit to 16-18 weeks in most cases, clearly this would be more of a symbolic gesture based on the data , but it could help people start to charge peoples minds, but of course neither side wants to give up any ground, so here we will stay.

Anonymous

I would definitely consider a cap that makes sense, first trimester or lower, a positive move. I hear the argument that if a woman needs a late term abortion to save her life that this would make it harder. But I just find it hard to believe that in that scenario making a woman go to a hospital to have surgery done to save her life, and possibly the child's, would be less preferable than having her just go to an abortion clinic.

Griffin Karr

Have you guys read this story yet? Pretty cool <a href="https://apple.news/AMEGj7-lzRLKtBX78uW1JqQ" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://apple.news/AMEGj7-lzRLKtBX78uW1JqQ</a>

Stephen J Seidler

Thanks for this forum, Colin! I'm not as convinced as you are that Roe v. Wade or, more precisely, abortion rights/choice, is bullet proof either at the federal or state level. It seems unlikely that Conservatives would put so much stock in stacking the SCOTUS if they didn't expect a return on that investment in the form of social policies that would be mandated nationwide. If Abortion were kicked to the states, you'd end up with wildly varying laws that change from state to state and even from election to election; ranging from ready access to abortion to jail terms if abortion is even suspected. There have been laws actually proposed at the state level already that would sanction the investigation of miscarriages as potential murders if a woman's conduct is considered "reckless" or otherwise suspect. These haven't gotten much traction because Roe v. Wade is still the prevailing law, but that would change if federal protections are subordinate to states rights. There might even be (albeit in extreme cases), attempts by anti-abortion states to criminalize travel to pro-choice states during a pregnancy; an echo of one method used to nullify or prevent inter-racial marriages most famously seen in the Loving v. Virginia case.

Anonymous

Interesting article regarding the insurance dependency and mandates with Obamacare. It gives us insight into one of the many reasons that government meddling with healthcare has made it more expensive for everyone. <a href="https://fee.org/articles/if-cosmetic-surgery-has-a-working-market-why-can-t-medical-care/?utm_source=zapier&amp;utm_medium=facebook" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://fee.org/articles/if-cosmetic-surgery-has-a-working-market-why-can-t-medical-care/?utm_source=zapier&amp;utm_medium=facebook</a>

Enrique

Obamacare started as something positive but end up half baked due to multiple problems in the current state of america. As a medical doctor that takes care of many with no insurance, medicare and medicaid trump care is bad business for the poor and general population I can predict worsening outcomes with many chronic conditions and the general health of our population. America will suffer and the only ones happy will be the rich and ones that have good insurance.

Anonymous

That is the problem with well intentioned legislation. There are always unforseen consequences of feel good laws. Economics must be the main consideration when introducing laws and emotions should stay 100% out of the decision.

Phil Crone

I'm sorry, but this article is incredibly misleading. Elective cosmetic surgery does not have the issue a place like an emergency room does where 50% of the people who walk in the door will never pay for the services rendered. Hospitals have to overcharge the insured to subsidize those that cannot pay for their services. This isn't even apples-and-oranges... it's apples-and-maseratis.

The Rose Experience

Today's revelations RE: Nunes comments are in a word, huge. Whether directly, or indirectly, he essentially admitted to spying on Trump and his campaign. Don't think that's what he and his people planned: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-surveillance-idUSKBN16T2GQ" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-surveillance-idUSKBN16T2GQ</a>

The Rose Experience

Big proponent of The Inquiry. Tackle topics from 4 different angles, with 4 different POV's. Helena Merrimen is my fave but she's now off on maternity leave.

William Carroll

Concerning the Democratic leadership problem, I feel as though we are at an inflection point in politics. The parties are shifting in ways we can no longer predict. Both parties are nearly unrecognizable from just 10 years ago. The Democrat's need a visionary with fresh ideas about leadership and administrative structuring. If they cannot find this person, they are likely to collapse into a new and very different party.

Phil Crone

Enrique - "Half Baked" is a great way to describe Obamacare. It laid out a bunch of great ideas based on incredibly flawed funding assumptions (mainly in the exchange markets &amp; Medicaid). It was becoming pretty clear based on our financials that it was going to be untenabale going forward. Ultimately, convincing the "invincibles" that don't "need" insurance to buy in is what will drive down costs. Governments can easily do this by just taxing everyone. Insurers have not been able to express that value proposition. Getting rid of the minimum Actuarial Value is a big step in the right direction, even though it seems counter-intuitive. Selling millenials on cheap catastrophic insurance with HSA's and government-funded continuation-of-coverage credits would be a major infusion of cash into the system to help lower costs for all. The first step is lowering that uninsured burden on hospitals. Just cutting the percentage of uninsured non-paying patients by even 10% would lower costs by billions for the market as a whole.

Anonymous

While I agree that emergency rooms are quite complex by nature, the overarching idea is that costs for Healthcare are not transparent. However, why is it ok for patients not to pay for services rendered and why are those that can pay charged to cover them? This is not the norm in any other industry.

Phil Crone

Legally, if someone shows up in an ER in need of care, the docs have to stabilize them at the very least. I'm sure there's also an altruistic part of this where the docs go above this, knowing damn well it's a cost to the hospital. (Which isn't totally surprising when you remember most docs aren't actually employed by the hospital, but by their own practice.) Cost transparency, on the other hand, is a MASSIVE problem. It was never properly addressed in Obamacare, and a chief complaint many "in the know" have is that hospitals can keep their pricing secretive, mostly done so as leverage to negotiate with insurers. (If we don't know what Aetna pays for a service, how can we know if we're getting a great deal or a terrible deal beyond the usual &amp; customary amount, which is generally a crock of shit price anyway.)

Anonymous

I'm always interested in how an attack on North Korea would result in a conflict between the US and China. It seems like an attack on North Korea could lead to a much larger international conflict, at least that's the threat

Comic Stats

I used to work for as a researcher for Glenn Beck out of his Dallas studios. He hates hypocrisy, and being accused of it. My interpretation is that, to Glenn, it's worse to say "I'm pro-choice, and all y'all are hypocrites" than it is to say "While you are making a principled argument, I disagree."

Comic Stats

Also, if you're ever looking for help researching stuff for Colin's Last Stand, feel free to message me.

Stephen J Seidler

It is difficult to leave emotion out of decisions that are literally life and death, though granted this might be easier for those who aren't affected or don't expect to be. The reason a pure free market solution can't work in healthcare is because the mechanisms that create and encourage competition in this space are undermined by the fact that everyone, sooner or later, in some way, MUST use this service. I can choose to do without a car or a TV, and the market responds to this with competitive pricing or other incentives to encourage my voluntary purchase. But healthcare is something that, in all likelihood, I will use at last once involuntarily if I should pass out somewhere and be taken to hospital. Healthcare is priced accordingly, based on a "captive" audience. That's why car insurance is overpriced; the market knows people must purchase it or face major legal costs, so it's priced accordingly. And this is true even though, as I mentioned, buying a car is optional; enough people's livelihoods depend on being able to drive that it's still a captive audience situation. Healthcare is even more so.

Treethan

I think Glenn said she was intellectually dishonest. Made sense if her show said one thing and she says another. She could see her show as appealing to a market and her not caring because her market does not watch The View.