We Can Do It! (Response to: We Must Ban Sex Robots) - Transcript (Patreon)

Hello everyone. This is my first response video. I’m primarily going to be responding to this Feminist Academic Kathleen Richardson and her speech. She’s been mentioned from time to time in several of the articles I’ve responded to in the past, so it will be interesting to respond to this supposed expert directly.

Let’s get this dumpster fire started.

So in other words, you’re not here to call people bad. You’re just here to take away their property. Like the mafia don telling the man he’s about to kill that it’s nothing personal, it’s just business.

No, women don’t marry their vibrators. They just marry themselves. Trees. Dogs. Even ghost pirates.  They refer to their sex toys as their boyfriends and get companionship from animals like cats.

So men are guilty of being too efficient. While women have to get their sexual needs met from a vibrator, their companionship needs met by a cat, and their marriage needs met by marrying a ghost pirate. A man can get all of those needs met with a single object, and that somehow means they’re bad.

If a man personifies his sex toy, but doesn’t adopt a dozen cats and marry a tree. something is wrong with him, and we need to ban sex dolls and robots so that men will adopt more animals and marry inanimate objects like women do.

Oh snap. Bitch you did not just bring up prostitution.

Sex dolls are lowering demand for prostitution and putting brothels with human prostitutes out of business, thereby saving women from the exploitation you are using the justify the banning of the very object of their salvation.

Prostitution is called the oldest profession because of the reproductive roles of men and women. Men have always traded food and utility in exchange for sex. As humans evolved and built civilization, food and utility became money, but the concept of the trade never changed. In fact there was an experiment where they taught monkeys how to use money, and the females immediately began prostituting themselves to acquire the male’s money.

Either women are being exploited by the sex industry, in which case you should be promoting sex dolls and robots as they create a victimless alternative, thus sparing innocent women from exploitation. Or you believe sex dolls and robots should be banned because they are out competing female prostitutes that are merely prostituting themselves for money.

You can’t have it both ways. You either want a sex industry that preys on women, or you want sex dolls and robots. The only third option is that you want men to have no outlet for their higher sex drives at all, but that’s why there are is a black market for prostitution in the first place. You’d be stupid to think that you can simply ban dolls, robots, porn, and prostitution, and men will simply go along with it.

If the United States banned abortion, I know for a fact that you would argue that women would simply give themselves abortions with coat hangers, or have back alley abortions in unsanitary facilities. It’s one of the primary arguments for legal abortion which I know is a holy sacrament for you Feminists.

So riddle me this batman. If banning abortion only causes it to go underground, how is banning sex dolls and porn going to do anything but drive the sex industry underground and lead to the exploitation and victimization of actual women?

Typical feminist projection. The sexual dynamic is not based on the relationship of the master and the slave. It’s built on the relationship of the man and the woman.

The woman provides the man with sex, and the man provides her with protection and provision. This is seen throughout nature in the vast majority of sexually reproducing animals, including humans.

This is the basis of prostitution, dating, and even marriage. The woman provides sex, and the man provides protection and provision.

Feminists see this as slavery because women are expected to provide something to the man in exchange for a constant flow of resources. In the past women provided sex, raised children, kept the home clean, and performed other low skill domestic labor.

Now women expect men to do more and more while they provide less and less. and if they walk away and seek an alternative to this increasingly toxic situation, Feminist such as yourself try to ban whatever form of replacement men create. Be it sex dolls, porn, etc. 

The truth is that women have nothing left to offer a man except their vaginas, but rather than step up their game and offer something. Anything. They want the government to ban sex toys and pornography for men so that women can control them using their sex drives.

This asymmetry that exists is called biology. It’s not the patriarchy oppressing you, it’s basic biological reality, and there is no law that you can pass that’s going to change biology.

In fact, as Feminism has promoted that the genders switch roles, the fertility rate has plummeted across the western world, causing demographic replacement. It looks like no matter how much you encourage women, men still can’t have babies, and women can’t climb the corporate ladder and be mothers at the same time.

So at the end of the day, biology always wins, and the only thing fighting it accomplishes is the destruction of the society that denies it.

The welfare state is a direct result of women’s biological need to be provided with resources by men. They used their political power to create massive and unsustainable welfare programs to support women with the tax dollars of men. The welfare state is the end result of the egocentric misandry of women who seek to replace the male provider function with an artificial but more reliable one via government.

Sex robots are the direct result of mens need to be provided with sex. Women have used their political power to make marriage and relationships so one-sided and toxic for men, that they are seeking an artificial but more reliable alternative.

The main difference between the two is this. Men can have sex robots without enslaving women, but women cannot have a welfare state without enslaving men.

That’s what all of this anti sex doll and robot hysteria is ultimately about. Your crocodile tears for prostitutes and the dynamic of the master and the slave are mere projection.

If women were the slaves, you wouldn’t care about sex robots.

Notice that men embrace automation which allows robots to do the dangerous jobs that they’ve traditionally done? Soldiers don’t mind if a robotic minesweeper goes out into a mine field and gets blown up. Miners don’t mind if a robot drills down into a mine, and a cave in crushes it. It’s better that a robot was destroyed than a human life was lost.

However. Feminists want to ban sex robots while at the same time complaining about how oppressed women are by the very sexual dynamic that robots would free women from.

The truth is that women want to ban sex robots because it’s men, not women, who are the slaves.

And men who are forced to provide child support and alimony are not seen as whole human beings. They are expected only to provide resources.

The welfare state is training on that idea, that men are nothing more than slaves who work for the benefit of women.

Yeah pretty much

They do have farming robots you dumb bitch, they’ve existed for years. They certainly come in black, although green tends to be the more common color.

Also, that’s one hell of a segue. You went from dismissing your hysteria of sex dolls to accusing farm equipment of being racist if its black. 

Seriously Kathleen, let the pipe grow cold once in a while.

How are sex dolls misogynistic images? Sex dolls are designed to be beautiful and celebrate the female form. If they were based on the hatred of women they would look nothing like women at all.

Ironically, female sex robots which are built for function rather than form look more like Johnny 5 from Short Circuit than a human man. Also many female vibrators have inhuman attachments such as the popular rabbit nub for vibrating a woman’s clitoris. These would more rightly be described as misandric images because they dismiss rather than promote the male form.

This is just Kathleen employing Feminist projection once again.

That’s because Feminists call everything misogynistic to the point that the word has lost all meaning.

Nobody forced you to do that, you’re the one who cried wolf for 100 years to the point that the only reason people pay attention to your delusional victim narrative is because they want your votes.

Please Kathleen, educate us about all the things that women do better than men that have nothing to do with sex. I’m sure you’ll come up with an exhausting list that has nothing to do with the traditional gender roles you hate so much.

Go ahead Kathleen. I’ll be here all day.

If you’ve been paying attention to Feminism at all over the last 100 years, you’ll know that equality is the last thing they’re interested in. Similarly to how they label everything they don’t like as misogyny. Feminists bring up the word equality when they want to sound like they’re reasonable, and just asking for fair treatment, but actions speak louder than words as they say.

Right now in the current year, the latest Feminist push isn’t for equality, it’s for paid maternity leave. Paid period leave. Free tampons and menstrual products, etc. How is giving women special treatment based on their genitals equality?

It’s clearly not, and I’m not even going to go into gender quotas in STEM, lower standards for women, and the #Me Too witch hunts.

I don’t even have a sense of smell, and I can tell you’re full of shit.

You hear that men? What a deal! Just give up all your power to Feminism, and they pinky swear to recognize your humanity.

I guess women have two things to offer men. Pussy. And platitudes.

Only Feminists are human beings apparently.

I’ll start believing in equality for all human beings when Feminists start doing so as well.

All I ever see from them are double standards that benefit women at men’s expense, and then they have the balls to lecture men how they’re not human if they don’t embrace their own enslavement.

The second half of this discussion is from a male engineer from Hanson robotics. I don't have much commentary to add, but if you're interested in his words click on the link to the original video in the description. In contrast to Kathleen Richardson, he actually knows what he's talking about.

I hope you enjoyed this response video. Please subscribe to my YouTube channel, which is TFM's backup channel, Selestina Monkey. Also follow me on Instagram. I just broke 800 followers. Thank you for watching, and I'll see you next time.