Sex Robots Dangerous? - Transcript (Patreon)
Content
This is our first Feminist article straight from Cuckistan, otherwise known as India. You would think that since women can have men kidnapped at gunpoint and forced to marry them under a practice known as groom kidnapping, that they wouldn’t be so threatened by sex robots, but it just goes to show you that no matter what. bitches bitch. No matter how absolutely cucked a country becomes, women will just keep demanding more.
Let’s dive into the article and see what unique perspective Cuckistan brings to the Sex Robot discussion. About halfway down the article, it reads. Quote.
Sex robots can fulfill the threesome dream of people wherein the partner is not comfortable with the idea of bringing in another person into the sexual equation. Guilt-free threesomes can actually be a reality. Brothels with sex robots are being opened for men who have the desire for robot sex. Orgies, kinks, fetishes, you think it and you can have it with a sex robot. Unquote
Notice that her first point isn’t that women are going to be replaced with robots, but men may use sex robots to supplement their sex lives. This is interesting because in this scenario, the woman loses nothing. The man can get his sexual needs fulfilled while the woman continues to be provided for in the home of the man, and doesn’t even have to give him a pity hand job. She can provide nothing to her husband or boyfriend, and yet enjoy all of the benefits of the relationship. Why is this a problem other than men are happy?
Further down the article it reads. Quote.
However, the dark underbelly of the sex robot markets has a different narrative. The industry is sexist and runs on the stereotype of the female partner being passive and docile. It reinforces the idea that a female body serves to gratify the desires of its male counterpart. Not only does it jeopardize the idea of consent, it can have severe repercussions such as an increase in the number of sex crimes. Unquote.
Here is where the author goes full retard. Pretty much everything in this paragraph is provably wrong. Let’s tackle this point by point.
1. The sex robot industry is sexist. False. As I explained in a previous video about the form and function of sex robots, sex robots for women have existed for years, but they look more like Johnny 5 from the 80s movie Short Circuit than a human being. This is because women demand function from their sex toys, while men demand form in theirs. In other words, male sex toys are designed to simulate a real woman, while female sex toys are designed to achieve a certain function, even at the cost of realism. This in no way makes the sex robot industry sexist. You’re just seeing what you want to see because you’re conveniently ignoring all the female sex toys and robots that have existed for years for absolutely no good reason.
2. Sex Robots perpetuate the stereotype of the passive and docile female. False. this is simply the nature of sex toys in general, or even machines in general. When you take out your vibrator to masturbate, turn on the power, and it immediately begins vibrating, does that perpetuate the stereotype that men are passive and docile? If you bought a smart device that didn’t do what you wanted when you wanted, you would return it for a refund immediately. You’re employing a double-standard for female-like sex robots which you would not apply to literally any other robot whatsoever. On a related note though, men are attracted to women who act a little passive and docile, it’s called femininity. Maybe if you tried it once in a while you wouldn’t need to use a vibrator in the first place.
3. Sex Robots reinforce the idea that a female body serves to gratify the desires of its male counterpart. False. and again this is simply a double-standard that could easily be applied to vibrators and dildos, which could be equally argued perpetuate the stereotype that the male body serves to gratify the desires of the female counterpart. The Feminist counter argument is that sex robots are somehow different because they look like women, but they don’t justify why that would make a difference. I’ve previously pointed out that male sex toys are designed to look and simulate real women because men are attracted to form rather than function. Again, it’s double-standards as far as the eye can see when it comes to Feminism.
4. Sex robots jeopardize the idea of consent, and increase the number of sex crimes. False, and this is provably wrong. In fact, just as violent video games lower the rate of actual violent crime, sex dolls and sex robots would lower the rate of actual sex crime against actual women. For example sex doll brothels are proving to be more popular than human prostitutes, which mean less demand for prostitution, which means fewer women being lured or kidnapped by human traffickers to serve as prostitutes. Sex dolls provide a victimless and ethical alternative for even the most depraved men, while sparing women from lives as sex workers. So what do you think Feminists want to do? why, they want to Ban them of course.
Near the end of the article it reads, quote.
At the personal front, a sex robot can only imitate a human. It might be receptive, but it fails to provide the empathy, kindness and love on which stable relationships are built. One can have sex with a robot, but how can one find the warmth, the emotional support, the care that only a loving partner can provide? Unquote
Really bitch? What in the fuck would a Feminist know about empathy, kindness, love, warmth, and emotional support for men?
This entire article is about shaming male sexuality, controlling men, and playing the victim. Every argument presented is either patently false, a sexist double-standard against men, or just complete bullshit. Then you close the article about how women provide love, empathy, kindness, warmth, and emotional support to men? Give me a fucking break.
The real and only reason why sex robots will make the world more dangerous for women is because men will no longer have to put up with their bullshit, and they’ll have no reason to continue to humor their childish solipsistic entitlement.
This is Selestina. Sex doll correspondent for TFM News. Signing off.