Sex Robot Solipsism - Transcript (Patreon)

This is selestina. sex doll correspondent for TFM News, and I will be responding to an article that appeared in the Guardian, September 25th 2017 by Jenny Kleeman. Called Should we ban sex robots while we have the chance?

This article is amazing. Not because it says anything I haven’t talked about many times before, but because it has a moment of honesty. In the past, sex robots have been falsely attacked for causing an increase in the rape of real women, when the facts point in the opposite direction. Sex dolls and robots decrease crime, just as violent video games decrease crime.

Another common angle of attack is that sex robots objectify women and normalize rape. Well if that is true, then dildos and vibrators objectify men and normalize rape, but nobody cares about that. It’s only men who can’t masturbate with sex toys. Why? Because of gynocentrism of course. If Feminists didn’t have double standards they wouldn’t have standards at all.

This article has a moment of honesty, and I just have to say that I called this from day one. It was never about objectification of women, about normalizing rape, or about increasing the sexual victimization of real women. If Feminists cared about any of those things, they wouldn’t have attacked sex robots at all because each and every one of those attacks is either provably false, or simply a misandric double-standard.

I’m going to skip the first half of the article, which is simply a summarization of the Feminist attacks on sex robots that you’ve already heard me talk about across several videos by now. Around the middle of the article it reads. Quote.

Sex robots are different from sex dolls and sex toys because they have AI. More than just a mechanism for giving you an orgasm, a sex robot is designed to be a substitute partner: a vibrator doesn’t laugh at your jokes and remember your birthday, but Abyss Creations’ Harmony model can. Unquote

Before moving on to the next paragraph, which is the real highlight of this article, I want to point out that the author is concerned with AI that already exists outside of sex toys. You can have a conversation with Siri or Amazon’s alexa and tell it jokes if you want. Who fucking cares? Are women so insecure that they are threatened by an iPhone with a pocket pussy duct taped to it? Apparently so.

Anyway moving on, the article continues. Quote.

If men (and it will be men – even the few male sex dolls produced by Abyss Creations every year are generally shipped to male customers) become used to having sex with synthetic companions that are programmed to meet their most precise specifications, how will they then interact with real women who have the inconvenience of having their own idiosyncrasies and free will? If you are used to having sex with ultra-life-like humanoids whenever and however you want, will you be more likely to expect complete dominance in your relationships with other humans? Unquote

There you have it boys, the moment of brutal honesty. The attacks on sex robots are, and have always been, out of fear that men will find them more appealing than real women, and real women won’t be able to compete.

What’s wrong ladies? I thought you were strong independent women that needed a man like a fish needs a bicycle? Shouldn’t you be happy that men want nothing to do with you? Now you can focus on your career. This is what you wanted right?

A world without rapes. Without wolf whistling or cat calling. A world where men don’t harass you by telling you that you’re beautiful and ask for your phone number.

This is what you wanted. You wanted men to leave you alone, and now that they are, you’re terrified.

Later on in the article it reads. Quote

Sex robots exist purely to satisfy their owners. Is any sexual relationship healthy if it’s only ever about one person’s pleasure? Can sex with a robot ever be consensual? This isn’t about robot rights – it’s about the kind of sex that will become normal within human societies if we start having sex with robots. Unquote.

Here we have another example of the gynocentric double standard at work, but to really understand how deep the rabbit hole goes, I’ll need to quote the final paragraph of the article, which reads. Quote.

Why do some people find the idea of a partner without autonomy so attractive? Until we have the answer to that, we’ll need to prepare ourselves for the inevitable rise of the sex robots. Unquote.

To understand what undiluted entitled bullshit this is, you have to go back in time to before Feminism.

Before Feminism, men and women had different rights and different roles. Men had authority over their wives and families, but they also had responsibilities to their wives and families. Women subsequently had accountability to their husbands, and the children had accountability to their parents.

This was not a system built on equality, but built on the balance of rights with responsibilities. Of course, women wanted the authority that men enjoyed, and thus Feminism was born. However, they never accepted responsibility for themselves, and continued to demand that men provide their historically provided responsibility while taking away their authority.

After about 100 years of Feminism, men have been completely stripped of their autonomy within the bounds of marriage and family.  I could list all the specific ways Feminism has done this, but honestly, we would be here all day, and if you’re watching TFMs channel, you probably already know about them.

The point is that Feminism has taken away men’s autonomy, and not only have women celebrated this, they call it equality.

Women demanded welfare programs to replace a man’s role as a provider. Women demanded a police state and endless safe spaces to replace a man’s role as a protector. Women replace a man’s sexual function with their sex toys, romance novels, and Feminist slut culture.

Congratulations ladies, you replaced men with the government. You removed their autonomy, and made them little more than robots that only exist to give you pleasure, to provide you with money, to cover for you at work while you go on maternity leave knowing you can’t be fired because you’re a diversity hire, etc.

You used Feminism to turn men into robots, and now men are returning the favor, not by turning women into robots, but by replacing women with robots. This is the only way men can restore their authority over their wives and families, by taking the meatbag out of the equation entirely.

If that upsets you. If you’re concerned about how society will survive if men want nothing to do with women, then I have to ask you where the fuck have you been for the last 100 years when Feminism was doing this to men?

Where were you when Feminism stripped men of their autonomy and turned them into your unconsenting wage slaves?

I’ll tell you how to fix this. If you want to keep men from abandoning you in favor of robots, then you need to restore men's authority, and give up all the rights that Feminism has given you at men’s expense.

Don’t make the same mistake as those jackasses that demanded a $15 an hour minimum wage, and are all being replaced by robots.

If they wanted to keep their jobs, they should have abolished the minimum wage, or at least lowered it. They doubled-down, and now they’ve been replaced.

That is the choice you face. You can abolish the privileges you’ve been given, or you can be replaced.

You said it yourself though.

the rise of the sex robots is inevitable so I guess you’ve already made your choice.

Enjoy your dildos and cats.

This is Selestina. sex doll correspondent for TFM news. signing off.