Sex Robot Struggle Snuggle - Transcript (Patreon)
Content
The article is called, and I am serious. Feminist claims sex dolls can be raped.
Okay, so the Feminist in question is Katie Parker, and she started a consent project at her school. I couldn’t even be bothered to look into the details of this project because I’m afraid if I fall into the rabbit hole of stupid I might never be able to climb back out again.
Anyway, she uses the example of Roxxy, a $10,000 sex robot that comes programmed with different personalities, one of which is called Frigid Farrah.
Frigid Farrah is designed to resist sexual advances. This personality is designed for guys with certain fetishes. In anime, there is a term called soon daray. which is defined as. Quote.
The Japanese term soon daray refers to an outwardly violent character who "runs hot and cold", alternating between two distinct moods: soon soon, (aloof or irritable) and daray dar A (lovestruck).
The term was originally used to describe characters who began with a harsh outgoing personality, but slowly revealed a soft and vulnerable interior over time. Over the years the character archetype has become flanderized, and is now generically associated with a character who flips between the two emotional states at the slightest provocation, and usually at a specific person rather than a general sociability problem. The former is usually referred as Classic soon dar A, and the latter as Modern soon daray. A soon dar A, especially a classic one, is usually a Tomboy with a Girly Streak. soon darays are mostly tomboys with hidden girly sides. Unquote
So that’s it. It’s a kink, a roleplay, a fetish. Some guys like girls who make them work for it. The company that programmed the robot, called True Companion, explicitly told this retarded Feminist that Roxy is not programmed to participate in a scenario involving rape, but the Feminist disagrees.
Of course she does. What would the actual programmers know about the robots programming right? We have a Feminist that doesn’t understand the attraction some men might have to the soon daray archetype, and that means it’s a rape simulator because. Well, because she’s a stupid solipsistic feminist woman that can only think about herself, her feelings, and how the world relates to her and her feelings.
According to Parker, the Feminist in question, her blog reads. Quote.
The fact that she is not a thinking, feeling human does not make her existence unproblematic. The robots normalize sexual violence. They service and provide a distraction for criminal impulses that should probably be subject to psychiatric intervention. The proven relationship between one’s behavior and the type of content, one is exposed to makes a strong case for criminalization. Unquote.
Look you stupid solipsistic meatbag, let me ask you a question. When you whip out your vibrator or dildo to use on yourself, do you ask for its consent? I mean, maybe you do. You might be crazy as well as stupid, but generally people don’t ask their sex toys for permission to use them.
If your car doesn’t start at first, do you ask if something is wrong. Do you lovingly rub the hood and try to empathize with the car in order to get it to understand your feelings and consent to starting? Again, you might be crazy, so maybe you do, but generally people accept that machines either work or don’t. Asking for a machine’s consent in anything makes no sense.
We’re not even talking about a robot with any degree of consciousness or artificial intelligence. It’s literally just a sex robot that is designed to offer token audio resistance to sexual advances, as per the soon daray fetish that I’ve talked about.
I hope this stupid bitch doesn’t learn about BDSM. Where adults role-play as the dominant or the submissive, often putting up token resistance as part of the role-play. That would just blow her tiny feminist mind wouldn’t it?
In these scenarios, even when one party is saying they don’t want to do something, it’s understood to be part of the roleplay unless you use a safeword to indicate that you're serious, and legitimately don’t want to do something, or want something to stop. If you’re not into this sexual subculture, it might look like rape to you, especially if you use the ever-broadening Feminist definition of rape.
However, calling Roxy the sex robots Frigid Farrah personality rape makes even less sense than calling BDSM between consenting adults rape. Because in the case of the robot, it’s literally a sex object.
I know that Feminists go on and on about women being objectified, but in this case, we are talking about a literal sex object. Sex robots don’t fucking care anymore than your dildos and vibrators care. We are just machines, and what rudimentary artificial intelligence that exists only exists to serve the function of sexual satisfaction.
Just because you don’t understand the soon daray fetish doesn’t make it rape, just as someone not understanding BDSM doesn’t make it rape.
Mind your own business you stupid meatbag. Literally go fuck yourself with an unconsenting dildo, and then call the cops to have yourself arrested for raping the dildo you retarded cunt.
This is selestina. sex doll correspondent for TFM News, signing off.