Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Second question. Just a random thought but what if...

Would be okay having less monthly images in favor of more animations?


I'll take results into consideration but no solid plans on any option yet. Thanks for voting and your feedback!

Comments

Metall Andrei

Depends on the animation type. If you only going to take a image and deform the face and the ass to simulate movement, then no thanks. We have enough of that lazy "animation". But if you make animation with multiple coherent frames... you know... like how animations suppose to be... than yes. Bonus points if you make something longer than 5 seconds and has some different face expressions.

Anonymous

I don’t really have any opinion one way or another, I don’t even remember the last animation you did since it’s so sparse if at all. I cannot say I want anything until I have an idea what type of animations are you referring since all forms of animations varies and the quality are just as extreme.

ancesra

Of course. I'm thinking in two main types: free hand drawn frame by frame; and altering previous works (but whole body as past works). And the idea is to improve quality with longer time, more expressions, etc, something not possible now.

ancesra

I agree varies at some extremes from artist to artist. For previous mine you can select the "Animated" tag on the Posts timeline, though there is not much and I might missed one or more posts to tag.

QuantumAge

Who does not want more animations? I mean count me in.