Home Artists Posts Import Register

Files

Comments

Anonymous

The answer is C. From Vega v. Tekoh (from this past SCOTUS term): "In Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U. S. 443, 450–452, n. 26, the Court held that the “fruits” of an unMirandized statement can be admitted" (Vega v. Tekoh didn't change this, I'm citing it because it's where I learned this).

Anonymous

Not a lawyer, but I’m going with A, because, in a just world, this is how things should work, & because the NCBE released a statement saying that ppl taking the bar exam did not need to be familiar with this term of SCOTUS decisions. Second chance guess is B.