Home
Artists
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register
Partychan Telegram ThePornDude
Home Artists Posts Import Register

OA604: The Jan 6 Hearings (Patreon)

Published:
2022-06-12 19:27:45
Imported:
2022-10

Downloads

Content

Surprise! An early episode for everyone! Here's why: the 1st Jan 6 hearing is in the books. The next one is Monday AM. Listen for Andrew's breakdown of hearing 1, and what to look for in hearing 2!

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and share our videos!

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Files

Comments

Anonymous

At what point (or is there a point) does being told you lost the election, but your internal beliefs are that you didn’t )no matter the evidence), become a problem in the law? When you see evidence but refuse to actually believe the evidence - is there something in the law that addresses that? My worry is that trump will continue to be able to claim “I don’t believe I actually lost” and I’m wondering at what point that will pass the smell test if there is no evidence that he ever BELIEVED he lost the election…and how that applies to the rest of the United States.

Anonymous

Besides a criminal conviction, the Hearings should be used to build the case for 14th Amendment challenges to anyone involved.

Anonymous
>>85726737

If you can show that he really did understand that he lost, his entire alibi falls apart.

Anonymous
>>85726737

What if he has never shown that he *fully* understood he lost? I guess I’m asking what the test is for “understanding”. How many times of being told? What level of evidence in front of you?