Home Artists Posts Import Register

Files

Comments

Anonymous

A suggestion for the more famous Thomas Smith: when distinguishing two similar answers, consider the counterfactual. In this case, the defect clearly renders the goggles unfit for purpose. But suppose that there were a different defect that did *not* render them unfit for purpose, but was still a noticeable defect. Should the goggles still be returnable? If so, this means that (C) is probably not the best answer. This is what I, a non-lawyer, do when following along at home, and it really helps to distinguish answers that are both attractive.

Quark Twain

I think (B) and (C) are both valid arguments, but (B) is the best one to use.