Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

You may have seen some alarming headlines about Chauvin's lawyers asking for a new trial over a juror being at a BLM rally, but do those alarming headlines hold up? Should we be concerned? Andrew has the full breakdown!
Before that, we tackle a very interesting component of the census called the "differential privacy" method, and why it's the subject of a new lawsuit.

Appearances

None. Have us on!

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and share our videos!

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Files

Comments

Anonymous

Hey, thanks for the shout out! A very minor Andrew Was Wrong: Ale is short for "Alejandro," and it's AH-lay :). PS I'm looking into the "NY is 89 people away thing," I've also added a few more features since recording, so have at it folks! You can now delete states too, I know we all want to delete Florida, you can finally live your dream. https://apportionmentcalculator.com/ Update: I was using the *residential* population instead of the *apportionment* population. Data is fixed now, thanks Thomas for checking it out live on air 😅

Anonymous

The details with which Andrew delves into these issues is amazing and is the reason I am a Patreon.