Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

A recent episode of the Rationally Speaking Podcast featured Originalist Law professor William Baude arguing for why judges should be originalist. Needless to say, it was not a good case and strawman arguments abounded. Andrew is here to give us part 1 of the deep-dive that will set the record straight on why originalism is still bad.

Then we've got Ace Associate Morgan Stringer on for some pop-law! She gives us the breakdown on the lawsuits filed against DeShaun Watson which allege sexual assault.

Links: Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), Gamble Decision with Thomas quote

Appearances

None, invite us on your show!

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and share our videos!

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Files

Comments

TheNewTommyJonAmicusBriefsOnlySupportOneSide

Pretty disturbing to hear Thomas rush to call Watson a creep in a hearsay case. All plaintiffs are being represented by one attorney, so it is pretty easy to make it sound like a pattern of behavior when information is released through a single source. Recently there was a long list of therapists that vouched for Watson’s professionalism. I don’t know who is tell the truth and we probably will never know unless there is audio or video evidence to be presented. Perhaps that is the case, because if a woman is being flown across the country for a private sports massage it would seem like a good idea to record the session for their own protection. Not sure how this one is going to work out, but think it should be handled with caution.

Anonymous

I know im a bit late but damn that was a good episode. I love philosophy of law, excited to hear more. :D