Home Artists Posts Import Register
The Offical Matrix Groupchat is online! >>CLICK HERE<<

Content

Thomas immediately seized upon the key reason for the goofball fact regarding the condition of the banana peel in the question -- it does show that the event just happened -- and the rationale behind (C), that it was suggesting strict products liability.

Thomas's Second-Chance law firm got this one right by narrowing the choices down to (B) and (C), and agonized before settling in on "C" -- even though this "seems pretty stupid."

The correct answer, of course, is (B), meaning Thomas is now 76-for-141 (53.9%) and is on a four-question losing streak.

Files

Comments

No comments found for this post.