Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

Today's episode is all about democracy -- from the Russian efforts to de-legitimize a Clinton victory in 2016 with the #DemocracyRIP hashtag and media storm to those very same tactics being employed right now in 2019.  Is a new California law requiring a presidential candidate to disclose his or her tax returns the answer?  Listen and find out!

We begin with the release of the (Republican) Senate Intelligence Committee Report, Vol. I, which details the extent of the Russian government's activities to infiltrate U.S. elections in 2016, including de-legitimatizing an expected Hillary Clinton victory with social media storming (and the #DemocracyRIP hashtag).  It's truly terrifying.  And then we move from that report to something that looks to be in exactly the same vein after the second night of the Democratic primary debate.  Coincidence or conspiracy?  You decide!

After that, it's time for a deep dive into California Bill SB27 which requires Presidential (and gubernatorial) candidates to disclose their tax returns.  Find out what the media has mis-reported, what this bill actually does, why Andrew Was Wrong, and where the future is headed for mandatory disclosure requirements.

Then, we tackle another potential conspiracy theory -- this time, that the California State Bar secretly leaked bar exam questions to certain elite law schools.  Is it true?  (Not really.)

After all that, it's time for a brand new #T3BE on regulations regarding pasteurized beer.  Will Thomas break his losing streak?  

Appearances

None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

  1. Don’t forget that there are just 3 tickets remaining for Opening Arguments Live in New York on August 10, 2019!  Click here to get your tickets before they’re gone! 
  2. Here's a link to the (heavily redacted) Vol. I of the Senate Intelligence Committee report on Russian interference in U.S. elections.
  3. This is the actual evidence related to #KamalaHarrisDestroyed, including (a) the Hill article and (b) the February 2nd, 2019 NBC News story.
  4. Click here to read California SB27.
  5. This is the ABA Journal article on the California bar, and this is the letter sent out to CA law school deans.

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Files

Comments

Anonymous

On the CA bar exam, California scales scores to make sure there is very little variation between each testing. People will have higher raw scores, but after scaling we can expect to have a similar pass rate to prior testing. This is one of the major reasons, combined with the high cut score, that the CA pass rate is so low, it’s intended to be that way.

Anonymous

You mentioned Ted Cruz' run before OA began. At some point, I'd welcome your views on his eligibility to run for President or VP, since he seems to have a genuine issue with the "natural born citizen' Constitutional requirement. The Founding Fathers were dubious about even people who were born abroad as their parents were posted overseas by the State Department or stationed overseas by the military, though these people are routinely given a pass today (McCain is the most recent example), and that seems quite understandable. But Cruz?