OA193: This Is Worse Than Watergate - PLUS Mandalay Bay Suing Victims? (Patreon)
Downloads
Content
We begin, however, with everybody's favorite segment, Andrew Was Wrong, in which we revisit the Supreme Court with a few corrections.
The main segment tackles the Mandalay Bay lawsuit and explains the concept of a declaratory judgent as well as the 2002 SAFETY Act upon which Mandalay Bay is attempting to rely.
Next, we return to Yodel Mountain to discuss the recent Mueller indictments, Donald Trump's Treason Summit with Russia, and ingenue Mariia Butina. It's as salacious as OA ever gets!
Finally, we end with an all new Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #85 involving (ugh) real property. If you'd like to play along, just retweet our episode on Twitter or share it on Facebook along with your guess and the #TTTBE hashtag. We'll release the answer on next Tuesday's episode along with our favorite entry!
Recent Appearances
If you didn't see Andrew's live appearance on Left-Right Radio with Chuck Morse, you can check out the YouTube archive of it. And if you'd like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.
Show Notes & Links
- This is the link to the 2011 Ethics Report authored by Chief Justice John Roberts.
- Here's the Above The Law article we mentioned at the start of the main segment.
- We've uploaded a copy of the MGM/Mandalay Bay lawsuit so you can read it for yourself.
- The SAFETY Act can be found at 6 U.S.C. § 441 et seq., and the implementing regulations are at 6 CFR § 25.7.
- We discussed the Senate Intelligence Committee's report in Episode 190.
- Here's the link to the Mother Jones article about Butina documenting the claims made in the C segment.
Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/
Don't forget the OA Facebook Community!
For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki
And email us at openarguments@gmail.com