Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

60/100

Got unduly excited by the rapid-fire, smoothly carouseled opening credit sequence, which felt—much as Se7en's did, with an assist from Trent Reznor in both cases—like a harbinger of something new and unsettling. (It's not the montage itself so much as its glossy implacability, each image of impending death elegantly giving way to the next, like a conveyor belt of snuff-movie showrooms. Watched it four times in a row before proceeding.) That no doubt made the film's subsequent familiarity even more of a disappointment. To the extent that we're supposed to take The Killer seriously, as a moody existential portrait of homicidal efficiency infected by unwanted human feeling, it's retilling ground that Le Samouraï (which isn't my favorite Melville to begin with, though I like it) made fertile half a century ago, and doing so less persuasively. If you instead perceive it as a po-faced comedy about a total dingleberry, powered by superficially badass but deliberately inane voiceover narration, it's a lot more satisfying...but I have difficulty squaring that interpretation with the Killer expertly achieving his every goal (after the initial botched hit that sets the plot in motion), generally with minor hiccups to which he successfully adapts. Might be an adaptation issue, since I'm skeptical that the graphic novel seeks to satirize its protagonist's lone-wolf philosophy; were one taking that approach from scratch, the otherwise silly running gag in which the Killer uses sitcom-character aliases—just about the dumbest thing he could possibly do short of using his real name (though I did have to look up Reuben Kincaid)—might have had disastrous repercussions. Instead, he mostly is cool, even if his thoughts become wearisome, and the film serves as an entertaining but empty revenge saga with an admirably unorthodox conclusion that I just wasn't willing to swallow. (That's what you learned, Palmer?) Fassbender executes (get it?) what little is asked of him, would not have set the world on fire had this been his first major role. The two hours sped by and I might never have thought about the movie again, though enough of my peers love it that I'll probably wind up taking a second look. Gone Girl went from 60 to 61 (which nudged it from 3 stars to 3½, from mixed to pro), maybe that'll happen again. 

Files

Comments

Trevor Collins

it just hit me where I remember Reuben Kincaid from -- Ben Stiller Show sketch, U2: The Early Years! "after that I quit the business. who needs U2? let me tell you something... I Think I Love You sold more copies than Let it Be!"

Anonymous

Is there an easy way to find your review of a particular film behind the paywall? Or see if you have reviewed it at all? Patreons sort and filter tools leave much to be desired and I havent seen a tags used as a way to do this. Sorry for an unrelated comment, not sure where else to ask

gemko

There’s a search field on both desktop and mobile. It seems to work okay for me. I think you navigate to the page with all of my posts and search from there. If the title is a common word (i.e. someone wanting to read my Killer review two years from now), try the director’s name. In most cases, checking on Letterboxd will show you whether a review exists here. I usually post the opening sentence and a Patreon link. Unfortunately it never occurred to me that I should also link to the actual review.

Charlzz

OK, here's my take on The Killer. The movie feels like a more precise version of Kill Bill, and it seems headed in that direction when Uma (The Bridee) proceeds to beat her ex coworkers that were trained assassins under Bill and to exact revenge on the man who tried to kill her. Tarantino is loosely basing this on those classic kung fu movies where "you killed my master" or what drives Inigo Montoya to seek revenge.

Charlzz

I want to preface this by saying Patreon has the worst editing mechanism. For shame. Here's my take on The Killer. This movie feels like it’s treading similar grounds to Kill Bill, Uma Thurman must defeat her co-assassins who left her for dead in a vengeance tour to finally “Kill Bill”. There’s a final confrontation where either she lives or Bill kills her. Tarantino is basically using a classic Asian schlock kung fu movie trope of “you killed my master”, a sentiment also echoed by one Inigo Montoya. Only of course, it does not head in this direction and ends quite differently. But I don’t see this movie as Michael Fassbender playing this methodical killer. I see Michael Fassbender playing…wait for it, David Fincher. I see this as a loose autobiography of a man well known for his attention to detail, his fastidiousness, his lack of sentimentality (very Kubrick-ian, I might add). The way the killer operates, albeit in a totally stylized manner, is loosely speaking how Fincher behaves. I feel the ending is basically a quick commentary on how he reacts to his own “killer-like” approach. I don’t quite know how it ties to Fincher’s view of himself, but that’s how I interpret the movie.