Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

59/100

Awestruck by Murray's (and Coppola's) confidence at certain key moments—he does absolutely nothing, and it's just stunningly effective. Thinking in particular of Dad's long, blank stare when Laura asks him why he cheated on her mother, which is all the more potent for how little it directly reveals (and thereby implicitly suggests). By strategically keeping Laura's husband offscreen for most of the movie, Coppola successfully creates a portrait of marital discord stemming almost entirely from a "charmingly" toxic parent-child relationship; that the film is structured very much like a broad Hollywood comedy, without ever quite going for actual jokes (apart from Jenny Slate's recurring bit and a brief moment in which Murray comes close to reprising Nick the Lounge Singer), had me intrigued and impressed for a good long while. And I do slightly prefer On the Rocks to Lost in Translation, frankly, if only because it's less self-pitying and, y'know, racist. (My complaints about the latter in 2003 were a rare case of me being ahead of the curve.) Unfortunately, the film's third act is kinda terrible, replete with self-righteous speeches, painfully overstated symbolism ("can't hear women's voices," replacing Dad's watch with hubby's), and the sort of tidy mopping-up that a genuine broad Hollywood comedy would favor. Also, this is admittedly nitpicky, but a lot of the evidence that made Laura think Dean was having an affair really has no other plausible explanation, which is to say that the screenplay sorta cheats. (Dad's right, for example, that there should be tons of texts from Fiona on Dean's phone if nothing's going on. She's his assistant! Does he have her under "Assistant" and not her name?) Still worth seeing just for the two lead performances, and especially for Murray's depiction of a man whose enormous privilege has taught him that he has nothing to fear from anyone, ever. It's pretty chilling.

Files

Comments

Anonymous

Although I agree with your overall point about the supposed-cheating subplot, I think the question of why there's no texts from Fiona was answered in the scene where he called her "Fifi" in the confession about going to Mexico. Must be how she's labeled in his contacts.

gemko

I guess that’s possible. Not likely imo (even if I had a nickname for a work colleague, that’s probably not what would be in my phone), but possible. Similarly, there are possible but unlikely explanations for his suddenly shifting from horny to sleepy when she speaks to him. You can assemble a case but that shouldn’t be necessary.

MadeOutOfCake

can hardly explain how much I enjoyed this one - might actually be because I wouldn't be able to explain it and make it sound, well, understandable. So I haven't even tried my hand at writing a review of my own yet (which I do sometimes for recreative purposes as I'm sure many others do here). Gotta say that the "symbolism" of her swapping her dad's watch out for her husband's completely went by my head as I was so far gone watching this that any sort of ratio had escaped me already. I don't know - just had a great time (and it was also my last cinema visit for quite some time, as it turned out, because my mom was contaminated some time later, presumably from work). I was both looking forward to and anxious about your review, as I knew you would at best be moderately positive - but now I've read it, I'm relieved. Good review, as always.