Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

[Rerun] Dr. Kirk Honda does a deep dive on perfectionism and impostor syndrome.

Become a member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOUZWV1DRtHtpP2H48S7iiw/join

Become a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattle

Email: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contact

Website: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com

Merch: https://teespring.com/stores/psychology-in-seattle

Cameo: https://www.cameo.com/kirkhonda

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/psychologyinseattle/

Facebook Official Page: https://www.facebook.com/PsychologyInSeattle/

TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@kirk.honda

December 31, 2018

The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®

Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.

Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com

Files

Comments

Anonymous (edited)

Comment edits

2024-02-10 20:24:55 I had a professor who absolutely hated decimals in social science research because he believed it communicated a false sense of precision. The way we present research (especially to non-researchers) is important! I know my program spent a lot of time rehearsing the language (i.e. “with a 95% confidence, we can reject the null hypothesis of…”) all to prevent misunderstandings and avoid giving an inflated sense of the accuracy of inferential statistics, but that was the only professor who pointed out that the inclusion of several decimal points is in direct contrast to that goal.
2024-02-10 19:53:24 I had a professor who absolutely hated decimals in social science research because he believed it communicated a false sense of precision. The way we present research is important. My program spent a lot of time reinforcing language (i.e. “with 95% confidence, we can reject the null hypothesis of…”) to prevent giving an inflated sense of the accuracy of inferential statistics. But that professor had a good point that the inclusion of several decimal points does the opposite.

I had a professor who absolutely hated decimals in social science research because he believed it communicated a false sense of precision. The way we present research is important. My program spent a lot of time reinforcing language (i.e. “with 95% confidence, we can reject the null hypothesis of…”) to prevent giving an inflated sense of the accuracy of inferential statistics. But that professor had a good point that the inclusion of several decimal points does the opposite.

Anonymous

Had to pause after the first ten minutes to write this. I joined here after finding the schizoid deep dive episodes on YouTube. It wasn't just the cleanest, most accessible, and complete source of information available online, but nearly the only legitimate source at all on that particular topic. And I looked for a good while. So thank you.