Home Artists Posts Import Register

Files

As yet untitled All In For God book review 2

Comments

Brian Gibson

This idiot doesn't have time to learn anything he's busy reading the Torah over and over and over and over. He's a lawyer??? Lol!!! "Your honor my client is innocent because there are no answers to anything that has taken place". "So since there are no answers that I could find my client asks for you to enter a not guilty".

Anonymous

A good example in science is String Theory. After 40 years it still can not be falsified by experiment, or make any predictions. It has evolved to the point where it no longer even has the strings. what is holding it back is science. 40 years ago it was the number 1 subject in particle physics. Today very limit funding and very few people working on it. It was supposed to be the Grand Unification Theory but I don't think anyone believes that today. Science asked a question great effort and expense was spent looking at it and it was found lacking. religion has nothing to compare.

Anonymous

A jewish Kent Hovind? or Ken Ham?

Anonymous

I find this guy worse than Ken Ham. I don't think Ham believes the earth is flat. Kent Hovind, maybe, is on the same level of dumb. I believe Hovind accepts a spherical earth, like Ham, though. Hovind's overall affect annoys me more than Pollen. That could change, after the entire book review series is completed.

Anonymous

A prime example of how religious indoctrination poisons the mind.

Anonymous

Oh, no. This isn't the ridiculous part, yet? I honor you for suffering through reading it. Your notes must be really interesting, since you distilled them down to these videos. Just don't get too mad at yourself for financially supporting him financially by buying his book. I looked at Amazon and it was $25.00. There were no reviews. Yours could be the first. You know, you can add video reviews. I wonder if they can be half an hour long?

Ryusuta

Actually, it doesn't surprise me at all that he's a lawyer. Why? Because a lawyer's entire purpose is arguing for the conclusion they've been assigned to. A defense attorney is supposed to argue for their client's innocence, whether they're innocent or not. They already have their set belief and they need to convince others of it. A perfect match for religious people, honestly.