Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

(90's sitcom woo)

Commentary 

Is it a spoiler to say this is touching on video game logic?

It is?

Well, the heck with it, I want to say this is touching on video game logic.

What else am I going to put down here, that I spent way too much time figuring out Rhoda's pose in panel one because I wanted it to be visually interesting and appealing? No! That's rubbish! You've seen the panel! You all know that! All I'm left with is video game logic, because you write what you know, and by golly, what I know is useless, useless video game logic!

Anyway, any confusion will be cleared up next comic, unless I drop the ball on that, in which case, it wasn't SUPPOSED to be clear, you just don't understand my auteur genius.

Sidenote: This was posted late enough on a Thursday that it could be fairly be called a Friday comic, but we're not going to do that, because technicalities are a blessing. That said, I want to be clear that I still plan on a Saturday EGSNP.

Files

Comments

J. Jenny Jameson

Susan sees the world one way, they see it another. Reality is subjective.

ZekeStaright

Gasp! Susan's Been (Videogame) Naked This Whole Time!

Stephen Gilberg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lT_Rznj0ioY

Shrinkadink

If the anti nude cheat turn off right now and her "underclothes" vanished, I think we'd all agree that would be great

Anonymous

Oh, is Catalina playing with THOSE mods? :P

VitAnyaNaked

Okay, everything is clear about the confusion) and I think the next comic will clear up everything)

Kevin Wright

"visually interesting and appealing" - mission accomplished.

Kevin Wright

And, yeah, in Fable, if you weren't wearing any outfit, you were naked, despite appearing to have underclothes. In fact, there were outfits that were... smaller, than the "underclothes", as I recall.