Home Artists Posts Import Register
Join the new SimpleX Chat Group!

Files

The Drydock - Episode 180

00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:49 - Why did the Russians loose so few ships during Operation Albion, considering that the Germans came with 10 battleships and a battlecruiser? 00:03:13 - Why did the Germans note changes their codes in WW1? 00:09:24 - Were small German marine turbines of this era particularly fragile or maintenance intensive? 00:14:41 - Hull and deck curves on older age of sail ships 00:19:27 - Cannon balls bouncing off oak ships? 00:24:30 - Where there ships others than monitors designed exclusively for bombardment? 00:27:04 - Even though the preliminary attacks on the Normandy beaches were massive, why did they do so little damage to the Atlantic Wall? 00:32:59 - Why did the US never use 18 inch guns? 00:35:28 - HMS Hood and torpedoes at Denmark Strait 00:41:58 - Why did the Alaska-class have midship aviation facilities when every other post treaty cruiser battleship had stern aviation facilities? 00:44:30 - How key was the St. Nazaire drydock? 00:49:23 - When did RN officers stop free-lancing? 00:53:52 - Why did navies not try to put more modern guns on refits in the 1930's? 00:58:53 - Are battleship guns and armour lost technology? 01:03:01 - Was the glorious First of June a French strategic victory? 01:05:21 - Channel Admin An archive of Drydock Questions and free naval photos - www.drachinifel.co.uk Model ships of many periods - http://store.warlordgames.com?aff=21 Want to support the channel? - https://www.patreon.com/Drachinifel Shirt/mug/hoodie - https://shop.spreadshirt.com/drachinifels-dockyard/ Poster? - https://www.etsy.com/uk/shop/Drachinifel Want to talk about ships? https://discord.gg/TYu88mt Want to get some books? www.amazon.co.uk/shop/drachinifelDrydock

Comments

Anonymous

Q&A: Every history of the loss of HMS Glorious refers to the court martial the ship's captain was eager to attend, but I haven't been able to find anything on the results of the trial. Can you help here? Also, there is an decidedly different perspective on the loss - search "HMS Glorious – The cover up of Churchill’s Operation Paul". It mght explain some of the odd events surrounding the sinking. What is your opinion?

Capitano Lorenzo

Q&A: What are the top three countries (excluding the U.S.A.) that you would like to visit as part of your ongoing naval research? And what, in each of said countries might you be researching?

Anonymous

Pin Badges, yes, I would like to see more.

Anonymous

Pin badges yes! Have you considered challenge coins?

Art Brogden

Your very last segment omits what I believe is the "True" analysis... IT WAS an "Operational Victory:" for France.. A strategic victory for the British in that subsequently they were still able to maintain "Sea Control" off the French coast. What you have described is a tactical "split"; the convoy did get thru.. That's a French win at the operational level.. But ultimately a French Strategic "Defeat"... As it could NOT be duplicated.

Anonymous

yes, please for the badges they would be fun

Dubsington (edited)

Comment edits

2023-04-29 14:19:17 Q&A: In his book on the invasion of Saipan, Carl Hoffman mentions that the fast battleships (who were on the scene first) did a poor job of shore bombardment, and the only real effective battleship work was done by the old Standards who didn't arrive until the day before the invasion and had a limited amount of time. He attributes this in large part to specialized training: the modern ships had trained for fleet actions and the older ships had trained for shore bombardment. Can you give some information on this training, how and where it took place, etc? I am intrigued by the idea of a huge group of old battleships just blasting the hell out of some hapless target island for days on end.
2022-01-12 20:50:27 Q&A: In his book on the invasion of Saipan, Carl Hoffman mentions that the fast battleships (who were on the scene first) did a poor job of shore bombardment, and the only real effective battleship work was done by the old Standards who didn't arrive until the day before the invasion and had a limited amount of time. He attributes this in large part to specialized training: the modern ships had trained for fleet actions and the older ships had trained for shore bombardment. Can you give some information on this training, how and where it took place, etc? I am intrigued by the idea of a huge group of old battleships just blasting the hell out of some hapless target island for days on end.

Q&A: In his book on the invasion of Saipan, Carl Hoffman mentions that the fast battleships (who were on the scene first) did a poor job of shore bombardment, and the only real effective battleship work was done by the old Standards who didn't arrive until the day before the invasion and had a limited amount of time. He attributes this in large part to specialized training: the modern ships had trained for fleet actions and the older ships had trained for shore bombardment. Can you give some information on this training, how and where it took place, etc? I am intrigued by the idea of a huge group of old battleships just blasting the hell out of some hapless target island for days on end.

Anonymous (edited)

Comment edits

2023-02-08 16:31:36 Q&A: After being both having our navy stolen and capitol bombarded during the napoleonic wars (i am a dane if you have not guessed it) there was continual low intensity warfare in the danish waters. How much of the Royal Navy's resources were tied up in those waters (ships and garrisons for captured isles and so on)?
2022-01-14 19:22:18 Q&A: After being both having our navy stolen and capitol bombarded during the napoleonic wars (i am a dane if you have not guessed it) there was continual low intensity warfare in the danish waters. How much of the Royal Navy's resources were tied up in those waters (ships and garrisons for captured isles and so on)?

Q&A: After being both having our navy stolen and capitol bombarded during the napoleonic wars (i am a dane if you have not guessed it) there was continual low intensity warfare in the danish waters. How much of the Royal Navy's resources were tied up in those waters (ships and garrisons for captured isles and so on)?