Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

https://ws.onehub.com/files/a7c5rjx3

Comments

BtsOT79798

for me, if I was on the jury I would have voted for guilty anyways because I take anything said by the defendant when they are representing themselves with a grain of salt... their point of representing themselves is to seed in the fact that they didn't do it.. but since they themselves are presenting their argument it's already skewed in the same argument that taffet had when booth, brennan, and hodgins were trying to get their own cases to court... their emotions and preexisting notions of how the case would have gone with the evidence is clouding their findings and outcomes of the findings... so that's why I would have voted guilty immediately no matter how the defendant would have given their argument...