Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

I have not decided for myself what settings I should use to further improve this model, I like 2.0 and 2.2, 2.2 has more accuracy, 2.0 has more variety, and 2.1 is "fried" 2.0, it can do something that is not included in lora, but at the same time, with a large weight, it loses quality, 2.2 is work on the bugs again, choose for yourself and leave feedback, if possible, which model do you think is better (I did not try to get the best and undistorted images in the examples, you have to do it yourself, I used hires fix 2, denoising strength 0.5, initial image 512x768)

LORA weight from 0.2 to 1 depending on your goals, 1 - closer to the original style, there are no restrictions here.

CFG Scale - 7

Use Abyssorangemix3aom3_aom3a3.safetensors

I'm taking a short break from this lora for now, I have another very creative lora ready, and then I'm going to do that much coveted 90s style, which is pretty tricky because the early 90s look nothing like the late 90s, but it will challenge for me, to make high quality and maximum variety

Files

Comments

Nate Robertson

Im going to try them out, based on the images you posted I really like 2.2 the most, except for a few of them where 2.0 looks better. the only issue I've personally had is that I really like ponytails and it does not seem to like ponytails (I guess they werent as popular in the 80s). looking forward to that 90s style.

OneRing

I checked, with an average weight value of 0.6, a hairstyle with ponytails works flawlessly (these are simple examples with simple prompts without a Hires fix with a resolution of 512x768) http://puu.sh/JD09O/605f01c014.jpg http://puu.sh/JD0ah/0a019acb12.jpg http://puu.sh/JD0ay/f1fda2a028.jpg http://puu.sh/JD0bq/eec923a07f.jpg http://puu.sh/JD0bO/63ca312e05.jpg http://puu.sh/JD0c2/0aa9836696.jpg