Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

This is a non contact voltage detector pen that I bought a VERY long time ago.  Probably when they first appeared.   It was subsequently banned by the safety crowd for the perceived risk of it having a metal body.

The circuit board inside is unusually complex and expensive looking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6vrFSSAPmg

Files

Surprisingly complex banned voltage detector

This is an early NCV (Non Contact Voltage) detector that uses a ceramic PCB with printed resistors. I wonder if they used a ceramic substrate to give high stability at the very low currents involved in sensing electric fields. The quality of the construction was also the downfall of the early units, since they used a rugged metal body. That feature was pounced on by the department of highly improbable electrical accidents, as posing a risk to unskilled labour who might shove it in amongst random live metalwork. The principle of these things is that a capacitively coupled field is amplified and then used to drive an LED. In this particular unit there is a six-gate schottky inverter used to filter AC (already done by the detection method) and then drive a charge pump to get a decisive LED indication of a valid detection. I get the feeling that the person who designed this went by the book and built it out of standard logical sections, but in doing so may have overengineered the design slightly. I also looked at a much simpler version which uses one resistor, three cheap transistors and an LED to achieve the same effect. The cheaper version is the most common these days, but it's worth noting that some other clone units have clearly been "inspired" by the circuitry of the original design. If you enjoy these videos you can help support the channel with a dollar for coffee, cookies and random gadgets for disassembly at:- https://www.bigclive.com/coffee.htm This also keeps the channel independent of YouTube's algorithm quirks, allowing it to be a bit more dangerous and naughty. #ElectronicsCreators

Comments

Curtis Hoffmann

The electrical equivalent of finding half a worm in an apple.

Loscha

The second Darlington design always reminds me of your Ghost Detector https://youtu.be/oA5cuLMHIsY?t=271

Anonymous

I worked at Mullard Research in the late 1970's and the consensus at the time was that the future was going to be in ceramic circuit boards with screen printed components. I worked on improving and developing the stainless steel screens and conductive inks. The technology was not quite the revolution that was hoped for. It was a success, but not the game changer that was expected.

Mike Page

A metal body might be fine with a finger barrier. But there's absolutely no need because battery capacitance easily swamps out probe capacitance.

Mike Page

There are a problems using a logic gate. The main one is that sensitivity will vary with battery voltage. Even with Schmitt trigger inputs. Secondly there's a frequency dependence because the probe capacitance forms a differentiator.

Gadgetman

The Kewtech Kewstick Duo is a good, audio visual, and fairly inexpensive NCV tester.

bigclive

Knowing your design history I do sometimes wonder if I'm looking at one of your designs.