Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Deciding to watch Bo Burnham's INSIDE at the last hour of dawn after only sleeping 15 minutes thanks to insomnia might have been be a little too method. For that, along with the fact I still have a Mare of Easttown essay to finish…

I’ll keep it short.

* * *

I've spent a lot of time dreading pandemic art.

Like, I just had absolutely no interest in what most people would be offering. Not just the overwrought dramatizations, nor narrativizing, nor the emotional stuff about hope, connecting, and being thankful in the face of unprecedented adversity. No matter how important those concepts are to hanging on, they can’t help but feel like ideas that companies are using to try and sell phones. There is only the mountain of misery itself. Clear. Obvious. Unmoving. And in it’s face, all the transcendentalism in the world offers nothing. Now, I realize that’s a vague term because it’s been used in a lot of historically different context, but “it taught that divinity pervades all nature and humanity.” Basically, there isn’t some magic purpose to the pandemic. It is not tool that was given to help you achieve self-realization. It’s plague. It’s death. It’s horror. It’s a year of trauma. And all it really did was take.

Which is why there’s so little to talk about.

There’s no insight to be offered. No nuance. No bit to understand. Which means the art we’ve been consuming was mostly whittled down to it’s most essential function, that is to distract, or at best, lighten the lode the slightest bit from mental anguish. And any attempt to shine a light on the reality of things? Well, there’s a reason pretty much the only piece I’ve really respond to has been Ada Limon’s “The End of Poetry” 

Enough of osseous and chickadee and sunflower

and snowshoes, maple and seeds, samara and shoot,

enough chiaroscuro, enough of thus and prophecy

and the stoic farmer and faith and our father and tis

of thee, enough of bosom and bud, skin and god

not forgetting and star bodies and frozen birds,

enough of the will to go on and not go on or how

a certain light does a certain thing, enough

of the kneeling and the rising and the looking

inward and the looking up, enough of the gun,

the drama, and the acquaintance’s suicide, the long-lost

letter on the dresser, enough of the longing and

the ego and the obliteration of ego, enough

of the mother and the child and the father and the child

and enough of the pointing to the world, weary

and desperate, enough of the brutal and the border,

enough of can you see me, can you hear me, enough

I am human, enough I am alone and I am desperate,

enough of the animal saving me, enough of the high

water, enough sorrow, enough of the air and its ease,

I am asking you to touch me.

The same complication exists for “the end of comedy,” which only the entry point for Burnham’s special. And he thankfully addresses from minute one, while lacing it in pointed observation and acknowledging critical hypocrisies. But before it could disappear up his butt, it all spirals out into the personal. No, no confessional. Personal. There’s a difference. And like the good, no B.S. pandemic art mentioned above, INSIDE is obvious in it’s direct intention. You’ll know exactly what it means because he’s tellling you.

But take heed, INSIDE is not about being suicidal, nor is it trying to co-opt that sentiment. Burnham thankfully has the self-awareness to mark the separation. For it’s about the stresses of anxiety and depression and the way they exacerbate the stress of being alive, which crest into dissociative disorders - all while the world goes mad outside your window and you’re left inside - so it all becomes further exacerbated being alone with thoughts… It’s daunting shit. And they are indeed part of the suicidal landscape. I mean, fuck, I’ve spent the last few weeks thinking about Mulaney's quote on new sobriety, “when I’m alone, I realize I’m with the person who tried to kill me.” There’s just this sheer, massive amount of time we’ve spent in our own brains this year, possibly losing them in the process.

What INSIDE does is reflect that feeling. And I just mean that: reflect. Out of everything I’ve seen, it’s the one that’s mirrors that state of angry, helpless, empty delirium with anything that feels close to a mirrored experience. And it reflects it so clearly and vibrantly and emotionally (while sometimes taking potshots at systemic horrors of capitalism for good measure), that I can help but feel like it was welcome. The truth is I have no idea if watching this special may be triggering for you, but in my state of insomnia, it helped to feel that way. But I understand it is the kind of thing that can cut both ways.

But what might be less obvious is how Burnham achieved all this with a deft directing hand. It’s one thing to say all these things. It’s another to make the emotional landscape of it all come alive at the same time, especially when using only a blank canvas of a single room to make it work. But I remember I got five minutes into EIGHTH GRADE, “oh this guy knows what he’s doing.” The same can be said here. There’s a deliberate sense of craft to every moment, nothing feels repetitive (unless on purpose). He knows what a certain camera angle will do. An expression. A lighting mood. And he takes it all and marries them to the most melodic of songs… honestly, I’m still in it. But sometimes you have to be comfortable in the swirling eddies of maelstrom just so you don't drown.

So I’ll leave you with the words that have still been ringing in my ears

Are you feeling nervous? Are having fun?

It’s almost over. It’s just begun.

Don’t overthink this, look in my eye.

Don’t be scared, don’t be shy

Come on in, the waters fine.

You say the ocean’s rising like I give a shit

You say the whole world’s ending

Buddy, it already did.

<3HULK

Files

Comments

Jame Scholl (@satyric)

Very well-put. I waited to read this until I watched it last night. I think the reason it all worked instead of vanishing into One-Man-Show-Blah was that it rang true. It was genuine, or at least felt enough like it to me that I stayed and was open to it even while it was painful.

S. R.

The one part of the show that I didn't really get was the "white woman" section. I am not sure what he was intending, but it came off as just... Mocking femininity/things women like? Usually the point of a man dressing/posing that way is to highlight the absurdity of how ads/movies/comics frame women as objects, but he was copying personal instagram shots aka. personal choices. Does putting "white" at the front make that woke for a white dude to do? That reading doesn't really jive with the rest of the politics in the piece so maybe I'm just not getting it. If anyone has another perspective I'd like to hear it.

filmcrithulk

For me that entire sequence is 100% about the part where the angle changes and he says a really personal post about her mom passing that's earnest and real and it's making a direct comment that's like "hey, I realize I'm talking about real people who experience pain and loss" - and so much of it is really about how instagram often gets us to project a certain kind of beautiful life on the surface - remember the chorus that directly asks, "is this heaven?" - because it is a beautiful projection of life. I really don't think there's malice or mocking behind it. If anything, the best reactions I've seen on tiktok have been white women laughing at themselves and shaking their heads while posting how they have a whole bunch of the same kind of pictures on their own feed. And I think the singling out of white isn't about woke alignment, but just capturing that a lot of POC don't use a lot of the same aesthetic instincts, let alone face a different set of problems?

S. R.

Thank you for your thoughts! That helps it fit better into the bigger picture for me, especially seeing how filtering our real selves through the internet is a running theme of the piece.

filmcrithulk

Yeah and I meant, to say it's a totally valid question! It's one of those things that I think could easily be misconstrued!

Anonymous

The thing about the digression to the very personal Instagram post though is he then goes back to making fun of basic women straight after that. So my reading was more “hey I’m actually aware these are real people with genuine feelings and wants and needs… but it’s fun to rip on them anyway and sort of ignore that so I’m gonna keep doing it”. Came across as mean-spirited to me and I don’t think it’s fair to say I “misconstrued” him, I don’t see how that’s an unreasonable reading based on the choice he made. It’s also not really very funny nor does it touch on anything particularly original or insightful. He’s approximately the 10,000th person to do a bit about cliched white women social media posts.

filmcrithulk

I really don't know what to say other than I think that coming back to the same subject is just duplicating the way that deeply personal post can, of course, be followed up by normal posts. Plus, I could be wrong here but I really don't think it came across as particularly mean spirited? I mean it's not for me to say I just genuinely haven't seen anything as most of the people supposed the victims of it have found it silly and posted their own IGs along with shots of it? Are they actually getting offended or is people getting offended on their supposed behalf? Like, this sort of stuff is all complicated, I get it - same goes for the incredibly valid argument that compares how a lot of people didn't mind when Bo tackles it, but were aghast and got offended when women of color made fun in similar fashion - Like none of this is open and shut - comedy is finding lines and discussing those lines, but I'll say this about the subject, yeah, it's comedy, 10,000 people jump at any given subject. The difference is he wrote a good song an identified specifics which people found funny? It's weird because like it's basically one of the least interesting songs on the entire special but I'm still sort of gaging this conversation.