Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Since to last video I received several of comments with criticism. It is very fast, camera jumps, and it is "difficult to observe" breast expansion. Eh, in fact, I first of all wanted to do an active dance exactly.

But I agree, if count this way. I consider it! Although I would call this version "regress", since I removed auxiliary camera motion and vertical coordinate of body movement. Looks strange. I do not like this version so it will be closed and only here. But for someone it may come in handy. Although I understand, apparently there is little point in doing dances more

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1kd5kk1UgVuV3gTJtkubvLZ1Q2mEQRgXQ

New items are already being prepared for release, and remake of one old!

Comments

Anonymous

Hey man, As one of the people who commented on the last video, I just need to say I love your videos and the dynamic dancy natured of them, just that I found that the last one in particular was a bit difficult to follow what was going on, mainly due to the closeness and movement of the close-ups. It made it a bit tricky to see the dance, not just the growing boobs. You should continue to make the videos you want to see and make and don't take this criticism too much to heart. Like I said last time this is one of the best models you've worked with to date and I'd love to see more. Thanks for listening to us and putting out a slightly more measured video.

imbapovi

Well, yes, it was rather 50% of dance, 50% of the attention on breasts. Probably because I divided them equally, each part looks inferior than just dance or BE separately (i mostly wanted to make bouncing in fast rythm) But since this is almost the first video, to which I received about 10 comments in total with complaints that everything is very shaking and fast - this is not as usual!