Home Artists Posts Import Register

Poll

Bonus Content: WIPS & Extras

  • Remove just the WIPS & Dupes - Keep the Extras 22
  • Remove it entirely 0
  • 2024-05-16
  • —2024-05-18
  • 22 votes
{'title': 'Bonus Content: WIPS & Extras', 'choices': [{'text': 'Remove just the WIPS & Dupes - Keep the Extras ', 'votes': 22}, {'text': 'Remove it entirely ', 'votes': 0}], 'closes_at': datetime.datetime(2024, 5, 18, 5, 0, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2024, 5, 16, 4, 4, 57, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allows_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 22}

Content

Hi guys!

Two posts going out and I thought I'd put this to a poll to see everyone's preferences rather than just cutting it entirely.

  • Removing WIPs & Dupes / Keeping Extra's: This caused a lot of backend problems and a lot of nitpicking on my end. Most WIPS were dupes to begin with, just with slight alterations to the scenes and or poses. These will only be sent to patrons who specifically request them during requests if you want to see the full timeline of how it was made (200-400 pics).

     In terms of Extras: I will only save the good pics (no dupes) that didn't make the cut (upscaled or not), since I do get some of them that I don't use. It will now be included in the Uncensored folder itself. I'm guessing this can range from ROUGHLY 5-10 extras maybe~ depends on how long I'm working on the piece for, I have no clue how many will turn out but I know I get a decent amount sometimes.

I personally am on the fence of removing it, since it kinda served no purpose, if this wins out to keep extras I don't think I'd mind though, it could also be something I include if one project yields more extras than others. I do admit that there are some good pics that I have to choose from, it might be the same pose but in different angles or a different face. Upscaling those pictures yields random results as it might destroy their hands or face, making the WIP look better than the upscale at times.

Comments

No comments found for this post.