Another response to inaccurate accusation (Patreon)

Whoever says I was forcing a monthly subscription to use the mods is totally wrong and they did not even bother to read the posts.

I have stated in every post since I first added DRM that no subscribers will be affected, you can literally cancel subscription and wait a year then pass the authentication from another computer to get the token with your account whose subscription has expired for one year by then, it's written in every posts on patreon since I added it.

DRM is obviously bad for reputation since a lot of people keep demonizing what I did.

When implemented well this could've been a good thing for subscribers, since with DRM I can stop restricting download acceess with roles.

And it also allows for free updates for former subscribers.

For example if a mod still fails after a game update despite the memory signature I used, I can simply update it and release it, and people who subscribed for only one month for this mod back when the game was released, can now get the update I release for free without having to resub, but people who didn't subscribe still can't use it even if they can download it.

It's literally a win-win, only loser is pirates. But since all the hypocrite have to go againist me while still finding every way they can to use my mods, I'll continue to make it harder for them.

I am about to move on from Starfield to next game, I'll continue this as a service no matter what they said.