Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Carl Kirby of Reasons to Believe attempts to explain that evolution doesn't solve the problem of something coming from nothing.  Of course it doesn't.  Nobody thinks that it does.

Files

Distracting from Creationism with my CAT!

Carl Kirby of Reasons to Believe attempts to explain that evolution doesn't solve the problem of something coming from nothing. Of course it doesn't. Nobody thinks that it does. Sources: William Lane Craig and Sean Carroll | "God and Cosmology": https://bit.ly/3dfSqy9 The Galapagos Finches and Natural Selection: https://bit.ly/3wAAG9j Understanding Evolution: https://bit.ly/3litPvL Crash Course - Biology: https://bit.ly/3FUz0eX Self-replicating molecules show signs of metabolism for the first time: https://bit.ly/3MsXX3x Rotaxane raises the bar for self-replicating chemical systems: https://bit.ly/37T5idD Orthogonal Recognition Processes Drive the Assembly and Replication of a [2]Rotaxane: https://bit.ly/3FTxSrY Scientists built a perfectly self-replicating synthetic cell: https://bit.ly/37RrRPU Host–parasite oscillation dynamics and evolution in a compartmentalized RNA replication system: https://bit.ly/3FVKq1O In Test Tubes, RNA Molecules Evolve Into a Tiny Ecosystem: https://bit.ly/37RD5nw New theoretical model explains the origins of self-replicating molecules: https://bit.ly/3lhk3tJ Spontaneous emergence of autocatalytic information-coding polymers: https://bit.ly/3PrrWLa Structured sequences emerge from random pool when replicated by templated ligation: https://bit.ly/3yIrIJt Original Video: https://bit.ly/3wiGKUM Cards: RNA Spontaneously Evolved Complexity!: https://youtu.be/RAqnVKdL8lM Evidence for Evolution Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLLbOEx_k9dkdf5tqLmmC1o98WvyBYlGNk All my various links can be found here: http://links.vicedrhino.com

Comments

Anonymous

If I recall correctly, the "Write Jesus, then step on it" thing WAS an exercise in a real psychology class. Some students refused to do it, and that was the POINT of the exercise. It was to show that humans assign value to symbols.

Anonymous

I am so very tired of the "We don't know everything, therefore we don't know anything" argument.