Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Today, we finish with the Genesis Apologetics video attempting to show that a literal Adam and Eve are supported scientifically. 

Register for the Ehrman vs Licona debate here: http://vicedrhino.com/bart

Files

They're Wrong, Except When They Agree With Me!

Today, we finish with the Genesis Apologetics video attempting to show that a literal Adam and Eve are supported scientifically. Register for the Ehrman vs Licona debate here: http://vicedrhino.com/bart Sources: When humans faced extinction: https://bbc.in/3vRgRMf The Search for Adam and Eve: https://bit.ly/3sAirjo The Coalescent Theory and Evolution: https://bit.ly/3vDo42i The origins of marriage: First love marriage in the world: https://bit.ly/3sD7ZaT What Genetics Says About Adam and Eve: https://bit.ly/3pBVlHf Genetic evidence on modern human origins: https://bit.ly/3IHVGj2 Genetic Variation and Human Evolution: https://bit.ly/3vLHYbq Human races are not like dog breeds: refuting a racist analogy: https://bit.ly/3i2TWp7 Toba catastrophe theory: https://bit.ly/3sNHAqQ Original Video: https://bit.ly/3glOTz0 All my various links can be found here: http://links.vicedrhino.com

Comments

Book Of Jobe

So the important thing to remember is that English is the crocoduck of languages. Got ya

Anonymous

How do mathematics or computer science disprove young earth creation? I think the statement "name me a field of science and I'll tell you how it disproves a young earth creation" might be a bit too bold, unless someone can think of a way these two disprove it.

Anonymous

Technically mathematics is a branch of philosophy (in the same way science is), not a branch of science. Unlike the sciences, mathematics deals with the abstract rather than the real, even if it is used in every science as applied.