Home Artists Posts Import Register
Join the new SimpleX Chat Group!

Downloads

Content

Guest: Joel Whitney, author 

Recorded: February 27, 2019

The War Nerd talks to author Joel Whitney about his new book "Finks: How The CIA Tricked The World's Best Writers" which exposes how deeply American spies meddled in and weaponized highbrow culture and magazine culture in the Cold War — with a particular focus on the Paris Review, the famous literary journal founded by CIA officer Peter Matthiessen, and helped every step of the way with its many CIA editorial liaisons. One of the most intriguing was Paris Review editor John Train, who later pioneered the use of arming western-backed jihadis (in Afghanistan) with video cameras and training them to film—or stage, if they had to—Russian atrocities for propaganda use in the West. We discuss the Good — James Baldwin; the Bad — too many to name; and the Ugly, poet Robert Lowell. 

Buy Joel Whitney's book "Finks: How the CIA Tricked the World's Best Writers". Check out Joel's personal website including links to his articles. Follow Joel on Twitter.

Images:

*(left to right) Richard Wright, his wife Ellen, Shakespeare Books owner George Whitman, Paris Review editor Max Steele, and CIA recruit/Paris Review editor Peter Matthiessen

* Mohammed Ali and Paris Review editor/CIA collaborator George Plimpton

Total time: 2:09:49

Direct link to this episode's mp3 here.


Files

Comments

Anonymous

What was the name of the party likud is about to join up with Mark mentioned? I tried looking it up but couldn't find it, I didn't recognize the name.

Anonymous

Great episode the IRC was also deeply involved in smuggling nazis and fascist emigrees for the CIA. For corporate law and the CIA <a href="https://libya360.wordpress.com/2018/09/04/sullivan-cromwell-the-dulles-brothers-corporate-power-and-the-birth-of-the-cia/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://libya360.wordpress.com/2018/09/04/sullivan-cromwell-the-dulles-brothers-corporate-power-and-the-birth-of-the-cia/</a>

Ellen Harold

Each memorable verse of a true poet has twice the written content. — Alfred de Musset (1810-1857) Thank you for this fascinating broadcast. I plan to read the book, ASP. For those who, like Mark Ames, were wondering why University departments of English lit were considered so important, a good book to read would be Gerald Graff's Professing Literature: An Institutional History (1987). The first professor of English literature in the United States was Harvard's Francis James Child, the ballad scholar, in 1876. Before that modern literature was something you read on your own, or you joined a non-academic literary society if you wished to discuss it. English &amp; other modern languages were considered to easy for academic study. It was all Greek and Latin. The professor went around the room calling on each student in turn, had them translate paragraphs and try to figure out grammatical constructions. There was no discussion and no commentary, let alone a lecture. Indeed Child apparently taught English like that at Harvard until his death in 1896, and he was so good natured that he didn't mind if his bored students quietly left the room. The elitist doctrine of art for art's sake, which attained ascendancy in the 1950s and was given CIA support, is covered in Gene H. Bell-Villada, Art for Art's Sake and Literary Life: How Politics and Markets Helped Shape the Ideology and Culture of Aestheticism, 1790-1990 (1996). Villada contends that this movement had its origin in a 19th c. misinterpretation of Kant (d.1804), who was the first to assert that aesthetics was separate from morality and didacticism. As time passed, Kant's qualification, that an appreciation of beauty was a key component in the development of a good (i.e., a moral) person of independent judgment, was increasingly disregarded. Villada is South American which gives him perhaps a particularly balanced perspective on North American cultural doings. My own feeling is that in seeking to control literature and its teaching, the 1950s Cold Warriors were reacting to and desirous of counteracting all memories and vestiges of the cultural program of the leftist Popular Front of the 30s and 40s, which had been deliberately inclusive of all social &amp; cultural registers, high, middle, and low (in contrast to orthodox Marxism which privileged the industrial working class alone). Michael Dennings's The Cultural Front: The Laboring of American Culture in the Twentieth Century (1996) is an excellent treatment of the 1930s &amp; 40s Popular Front, which he considers a truly Populist movement, despite the presence in it of Communist elements. Anyway, it is a basic book for anyone interested in American cultural studies. I myself have observed that during the neoliberal era, even some professing leftists have argued that the working class expresses its true cultural preferences through the inerrant and impersonal information-yielding mechanism of the marketplace, i.e., market capitalism). Anyway, thanks again for the podcast.

Anonymous

Check this out too <a href="http://www.openculture.com/2017/06/the-cia-assesses-the-power-of-french-post-modern-philosophers-read-a-newly-declassified-cia-report-from-1985.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://www.openculture.com/2017/06/the-cia-assesses-the-power-of-french-post-modern-philosophers-read-a-newly-declassified-cia-report-from-1985.html</a>

Anonymous

This is really a treasure of a comment. Thank you for sharing

radiowarnerd

Hi Ellen. Thanks very much for this. Your theory about the urge to overcome the United Front presentation of literature makes sense, but I think there's also a naïve belief in the Ivy League elite circa 1946 that spycraft is an hermeneutic pursuit. This is stressed in The Ghost, Jefferson Morley's biography of James Angleton.

radiowarnerd

Most stories just refer to them as Kahanist and I don't recall the name of the party.

lazy millennial

This was fascinating. Probably one of my favorite RWN episodes.

Mark Ames

Otzma Yehudit. <a href="https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/elections/.premium-netanyahu-to-right-wing-party-merge-with-kahanists-and-get-key-portfolios-1.6956512" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/elections/.premium-netanyahu-to-right-wing-party-merge-with-kahanists-and-get-key-portfolios-1.6956512</a>

Mark Ames

This makes so much nauseating sense, thanks for passing this on.

Anonymous

I would like to see this episode released from behind the paywall for two reasons. One is that it's fascinating and, if widely shared, might gain you some new subscribers. The other is that it's critical that average citizens be exposed to this information so that they might be more critical consumers of the MSM. There's a nascent resurgence of the left across the wealthy democracies, and the ruling class will first push back first via propaganda and messaging from trusted media figures like Steven Colbert. (See: <a href="https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2019/03/13/colbert-smears-tulsi-gabbard-to-her-face-while-telling-zero-jokes/)." rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2019/03/13/colbert-smears-tulsi-gabbard-to-her-face-while-telling-zero-jokes/).</a> The information presented in this episode will give people the conceptual tools to dismantle these efforts.