Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

As some of you know, the $15 tier is currently is a discord round-table tier which people come to chip in new ideas (And they are often accepted) for new projects further down the line. But sometimes it does get a bit quiet when no one has any ideas or if there are any drafts to share. I feel that maybe I should make it more worth their while and perhaps even increase the size of our Patreon Discord a bit, gathering more ideas?

So I ask everyone, what do you think if I were to add like some work that is shown in advance (like some of the ones featured in Gumroad) into the $15 tier? These things will eventually trickle down to the $5 and $10 tier so it's not exactly extra content (or separate content due to the important difference of the $5 and $10 tiers) 

I'd like to not step on any toes though, so please let me know what you think of this idea



Comments

Arxynos

Tbh patreon members gets left behind too far from the gumroad update as everytime content for $5 and $10 posted, 4 or 3 newet content is avalable in Gumroad I think it would be better to make both platforms has the same update amount as patreon mostly meant to acess more updated content. gumroad supposed to be an optional method to access the content for non monthly pay users. I think it would be much better to bundle the tg content so gumroad buyers wont get charged too much maybe for example, dragalia lost vol 1 pack where pay once contain dragalia lost tg series or theme based for example pokemon tg bundle where the story is not connected but its pokemon theme related unless you decide to create a 1 long tg story content then its fair to have them pay seperate with the bundle due to many pages with similar price with the bundle based on the amount of pages and the quality of the art from each individual artist from how detail of the tg and the duration of the tg. What do you think?

Anonymous

I'm still waiting for Gumroad stuff from around 3 months back. I don't even know if they will ever be distributed elsewhere. The whole problem with this kind of thing is there's no way to know if imagery meets personal taste, until it's viewed in its entirety. I can imagine many people end up disappointed when they pay and find out it's not what they hoped for. But I guess there's no way around that.

M1yago

I honestly don't really understand why people would vote no here, since it's strictly more content being available