Home Artists Posts Import Register

Poll

Changing Restrictions

  • Agree 47
  • Disagree 31
  • 2023-11-27
  • 78 votes
{'title': 'Changing Restrictions', 'choices': [{'text': 'Agree', 'votes': 47}, {'text': 'Disagree', 'votes': 31}], 'closes_at': None, 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2023, 11, 27, 2, 30, 49, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allows_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 78}

Content

Hey Patrons, I value all your input and want to make sure our polls aligns with most of your preferences. That being said, I’m considering reverting back the character cooldown/restriction within our polls from 4 months to 2 months. I feel like this is a fair suggestion considering we have the 2 week rule that will still continue to provide diverse winners from the many different series being nominated in our polls.

I would love to hear your thoughts on this. Do many of you agree or disagree with reverting back to just waiting for 2 months to nominate a character again? Or should it remain at four or do you have another duration in mind like 3 months?

Your feedback at this topic will help me make informed decisions, thank you.

Comments

RagueltheUFO

Disagree because it allows 3 Houses to gain dominance again. Nobody wants to waste their pick on a guarantee character and then they can just keep asking. When they show up on the poll, they will almost always win. This also applies to Pokémon. Plus variety in the girls instead of the same ones who win because the patrons with more money can make it rather lobsided

Cinnammoner

Disagree, because I feel like the 4 month cooldown contributed to having more diverse winners (even within a series). There are too many staple girls here which would fill up every two-month-duration and that's just boring.

anon

I disagree on your last point. If you look over the comms most of them are of characters that would never win a poll, and four months of wait time hasn't improved their chances.