WW2 'D-DAY' BLOOD SACRIFICE? (Patreon)

I'm doing research about D-Day to see if there's any evidence to support the claim that it was an occult blood-sacrifice.

Most of the fist/second wave allied D-Day troops were just kids. Teenagers -with minimal training by today's standards- and no previous combat experience. They were often not told what they were going to face until a few hours before the mission commenced.  I've watched dozens of interviews with D-Day vets (in their 80's & 90's at the time of interview) and the vast majority of them are clearly still suffering PTSD all these decades later. They nearly all break down in tears (often visibly trembling) when giving their accounts. 'Harrowing' really doesn't do it justice. 

You may or may not be aware that the vast majority of the first and second waves of allied troops (especially American) to land on the beach at Normandy were killed. Some estimates say it was around 80%, with most of the surviving 20% being injured, and/or losing their rifles and equipment and therefore being helpless, and essentially useless in the battle.

At 6am on the 6th day of the 6th month (666) the troops disembarked from battleships stationed off the coast of Normandy, France, and were carried onto the beach by small high-sided flat-bottomed landing craft which held 30 or 60 men, depending on the model. The boats were designed so that the front side would drop down to become a ramp, allowing troops and vehicles to alight onto the beach. In many instances, however, as soon as the ramp was lowered, the entire unit of troops were annihilated within seconds by the German machine gunners perched on the hills and clifftops which overlooked the beach. Heads and body parts were blown clean off by high powered machine gun rounds. Skull parts, chunks of flesh, brain matter, and intestines were splattered all over the craft interior. In instances where a few terrified soldiers (usually at the back of the craft) survived the initial onslaught, they were never the less ordered to step over the bodies of their freshly slaughtered comrades and exit the vessel to face almost certain (and similarly gruesome) death. Strict orders were given that only the dead and injured were allowed to stay on the boat and return to the battleship or medical vessel.

The water was very rough, and the Germans had littered the beach with mines and obstacles, which often made it impossible for the boats to get close enough to drop the soldiers on dry land. Therefore, in many instances, the ramps were dropped over water, which turned out to be much deeper than anticipated. The soldiers were each saddled with 60-90lb back backs, so as they plunged into the sea, many of them drowned.

It was literally a slaughter. The 'official' narrative is that although 'mistakes were made' in the fog of war, the sacrifice was necessary in order to overwhelm the Germans with sheer numbers. The mission objective was fulfilled of course, but only by using the first/second wave troops as bullet sponges to deplete the German ammunition. Why didn't the warships bombard the cliff tops BEFORE the troops landed? Because THEY DID successfully take out  some gun nests after the first few waves had already gone in. I saw an interview with one of the warship captains, who said it was foggy, rough, and therefore difficult to see targets. Getting closer to the beach in a giant warship you risked running aground. But after hearing of the slaughter going on he decided to do it anyway, and successfully took out some German bunkers and gun nests.  There was something like 4,000 allied ships on the water that day. 4,000! They could have turned those cliffs to rubble before a single soldier stepped foot on that beach. But instead they marched those young men into a meat grinder. Literally.

Some would say they didn't want to risk civilian casualties by firing at the beach in haphazard fashion. Well they had previously peppered that same area with air strikes. The bombs were supposedly meant to blow holes into the beach and provide cover for the allied troops, but 'mistakes were made' and the bombs ended up landing on or near civilian targets, about two miles inland. I also saw an interview with an allied D-Day veteran who gave a first hand account of how he witnessed allied troops executing civilians in Normandy, for allegedly "stealing dead soldiers boots". So I find the whole "we couldn't risk hitting civilians" angle dubious. Those cliffs were littered with German infantry. After the first few allied units had been wiped out, there should have been a change of tact there and then. Hold off. Choose a different area of the beach. Send some recon crews in. But no, they just sent them into certain death. 4,400 allied troops died on the beach that day, with tens of thousands more injured.

Today's (western) troops no longer face such scenario's, of course. They have far superior firepower, technology, and air support. But their "enemies" (and the native civilian population) on the receiving end, suffer the exact same fate- often far worse -as fallen allies did back in 1944. War is a terrible thing. Those who so hastily declare them should be forced to fight in them themselves.