Home
Artists
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register
Partychan Telegram Live Sex ThePornDude
Home Artists Posts Import Register

Hold Still, Keiko (Patreon)

Published:
2017-12-26 03:10:43
Imported:
2021-11

Content

Now that's just creepy.

Did I mention her eyes glow in the dark?  Well, they do.

Files

Comments

Simone Spinozzi

🤔 okay, in the picture i see you as you were trying to stabilize the mannequin for a picture. But i don't get the joke. I suppose it's about violence on women or sexual titillation from BDSM, because i get that vibe from the text... but i don't see it in the image, so i don't understand what's supposed to be "creepy" about it. 😅

Simone Spinozzi

i... don't think marketed mannequins usually get their eyes painted in glowing paint... it costs more and it's too creepy. 😅

tegerio
>>9100251

She's a mannequin; she was already standing still. If she was a real person, the hand reaching in and grabbing her face would be a little .. odd, wouldn't it?

Simone Spinozzi
>>9100251

🤔 Depends on whose hand it is, and what gesture that is. If it's a complete stranger, sure, there are few instances in which such an hand movement does not look bad... maybe a photoshoot model getting her head posed right for a picture? If it's a friend or a lover it could be a comforting gesture like a caress or a light playful buff for being an idiot. But a picture like that to the face of a complete stranger... yes it would be creepy. The problem is that this is a mannequin, and her expression is forcefully fixed thus i cannot know if the hand is well or badly received and if it is just a professional business thing as i've seen in many photoshoot. Granted... in a photoshooot the models are treated little better than mannequins... and that.. yeah... that <b><i>IS</i></b> creepy now that you make me think about it... but then again... that's their purpose for that kind of job and also they get paid for it. So basically it's the lack of context for the roleplaying that makes me unable to understand what you were trying to convey with that "creepy", but yes, your explanation now did put a bit more context to it and i can see what you meant.