Home Artists Posts Import Register
The Offical Matrix Groupchat is online! >>CLICK HERE<<

Content

Hey All,

I hope you're doing great! I'm sitting in my hotel room in San Francisco after another day of recording new episodes of CLS: Fireside Chats (you can look forward to great podcasts with Brian Altano, Daemon Hatfield, Destin Legarie, Mark Ryan Sallee, Alexa Ray Corriea, and Ryan McCaffrey rolling out in the coming weeks, with more still to record). So I'm just now finally getting to sit down and chat with you about what's going on here on Patreon, and how a fundamental change being made on the service may affect you.

You can read about the entire ordeal here: https://blog.patreon.com/updating-patreons-fee-structure/

And here: https://patreon.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115005631963

But in short...

Traditionally, Patreon has taken a completely reasonable 5% rip of the money made on the site's thousands of accounts. On top of that, however, are credit card and transaction fees that don't go to Patreon and that are traditionally paid by the creators. Patreon says that these fees can run as high as 10%, meaning a creator could potentially lose 15% of his or her money. For what it's worth, neither on CLS nor back on Kinda Funny did we ever see anything approaching that. For both CLS and KF (at the time), we were making more than 90% of our pledges after fees. But I’ll take Patreon’s word that this isn’t necessarily the common (and obviously only) experience for other creators.

The new change essentially puts the onus of fee and transaction payments on Patrons, and not creators. I won't pretend to understand the entire breadth of why these changes are being made (the links above explain it, and some of it makes no sense to me at all). But here's what I do know: Creators will now get a clean 95% of the money pledged (because we'll only be paying the 5% rip without transaction fees), and Patrons will now front the fees we used to pay, to the tune of 35¢ + 2.9% of your pledge.

For many people, this will be (and is) completely inconsequential, especially at mid-and-high tiers, but it's not inconsequential for everyone, particularly for those on a budget who donate small amounts of money each month (like a dollar or two). Your dollar pledge now costs $1.38 a month. Your $2 pledge now costs $2.40. That may not seem drastic, but for some people, it is, especially if they, say, have 15 dollar pledges on 15 Patreons, bringing their monthly cost up from $15 to $20.70.

I don't like this change, and neither does a portion of my audience. I've shed more than 1% of my support base in the last 24 hours, exclusively as a result of Patreon's decision to do this. That's especially unfortunate (and incredibly discouraging) considering that the meteoric success of my Patreon early on meant it's been in a correction since launch, and was finally stabilizing. I've voiced my displeasure with this decision, and am speaking with Patreon CEO Jack Conte tomorrow about it. So, perhaps I'll have more (possibly good) news for you then. But it doesn't sound like they're going to change course. This seems like it's going to be the new normal, regardless of the rather vocal and visible outcry.

This (possibly) new normal is far from ideal. I don't want you to pay more for the content than you already do. I had and have no problem paying those fees, and every big creator on Patreon seems to feel the exact same way. I think this is a mistake, and has the potential to erode away the "low-end" structure of Patreon support, where people simply won't give $1 or $2 a month, either on principle, or because it hurts their wallet. Either way, I don't begrudge you that decision. All I can say is that I hope you choose to continue to support CLS.

Ironically, even if I shed some low end support, I stand to make demonstrably more money as a result of Patreon's decision. But I don't care. I don't want more money per user. I want you to be happy. I want you to pay a flat fee for supporting me, and let me and my wallet worry about the bullshit that's now being put on you. When Patreon says in their post about the change, "We want you to know that we approach every change with a creator-first mindset, aiming to help creators grow their businesses," know that I totally disagree, and think Patreon should be engineered with Patrons in mind first. This decision was not made with you in mind first -- clearly -- and for that, I apologize.

I'm truly sorry for any inconvenience this decision may have caused, and I promise to advocate on your behalf to try and fix this unforced error. Moreover, I hope you continue to support Colin's Last Stand here on Patreon, and find value in your contribution, and in the content. Without you, CLS will not exist.

I appreciate you, your time, and your support. Sincerely, -Colin

Comments

Robert Byers

Thankyou. I knew I probably wasn’t the only one not thrilled when I read this earlier. I’m here to support you and my pledge won’t change for now but I don’t see this being a good thing for Patreon in the long run. Feels like I’m going to some mall restaurant when they charge you to pay by card.

Aaron

It strikes me as a curious decision as well. I'm by not means a mid/high tier backer, but it seems like it's not patron-friendly, and this whole escapade wouldn't be possible without them. Curious to hear what your chat with the head Patreon leads to.

Anonymous

I was reading this today scratching my head how this isn’t going to harm creators. My first intinct was to drop my support, but I remember it’s not about them it’s about you and your content. Hope they see the light and reverse this decision. Thank you for putting us first! Keep up the great work man!

Anonymous

Glad to see you posted your thoughts about it. I posted about it earlier myself. I'm still gonna be able to stay at the tier I'm at, but might have to cut back on either a tier for another creator or stop supporting them all together.

Joshua Chap

I know some people personally affected by this that have lost a huge amount of their patrons and may not get them back now because of this, and are now worried as to how the hell they are going to even pay their bills because this change has pissed off everyone. Also, here is a fascinating thread on twitter as to possibly why these fees are changing. <a href="https://twitter.com/cwbuecheler/status/938787629738397696" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/cwbuecheler/status/938787629738397696</a>

Joshua Chap

same here, as I am on a fixed income and it's very unfortunate that I have to do that and is out of my control.

Jason Kelley

You consistently show that you’re a good, honest dude. I’m happy to continue my monthly pledge unchanged after the increase.

Anonymous

They can't reverse course on this. They were just valued at 450+ million USD. on 8M of revenue. they HAVE to bring revenue up. Of course nothing they do is special, only the brand recognition is worth anything. I suggest you open an account on makersupport or or something else. Patreon will probably increase the fees further at the pressure of the VC who now own the company.

Anonymous

I am okay with it because I want to support creators regardless of the incurred extra cost. With that said I don't agree with the decision to make a change to what is essentially the creators business without first consulting the creators themselves. I appreciate your transparency and I am disappointed with Patreon's complete disregard for BOTH of their customers.

Owen

Take that extra percentage... and keep doing those scholarship things man. I'll pay the extra fee, I'm not going anywhere. It's a stupid decision, but not gonna punish the creators I support for that decision.

Anonymous

Thanks Colin for speaking out on this. I fucking hate stupid fee like this. why can’t there be a option to pay a flat charge or something else . Keep doing the great work. I will support you if they figure this out

Evan Bederman

You're a righteous dude, Colin. This won't change my support but I totally feel for those who are forced to. Thanks for doing and saying what you can!

Anonymous

Hey Colin, thanks for this post. I'm one of the lower-end backers who decided to drop my pledge for now due to this change, as I was stretching across several creators and the new structure doesn't fit my budget. I hope to be able to support you in the future and/or in some other way which makes more sense. Really sorry for that, but glad it looks like you will be all right in the short term. Thanks for your planned talk with Jack, let us know how it goes.

Brett Geiser

Stupid decision by Patreon, but will not impact my pledge. Hopefully they do an about face.

Anonymous

I give $15 total to three Patreons, including this one (obviously). I won't even notice the $3~ bump a month, but it still seems like a huge misstep. Thanks for always being transparent, fair, and respectful with us, Colin. I'm not leaving you, I appreciate all you've done the last 10 years far too much.

Eric Wilson

This doesn’t change anything for me either. It’s unfortunate but fuck it, i’m still down.

NuFlash

I am still down but like you said I feel bad for the ones who this is a deal breaker for. I have not seen anyone other than Patreon supporting this. I also don't know why they wouldn't ask creators their opinion first before doing this. Thanks for the transparency and fighting for us

Cameron Paterson

Im still sticking around to support you Dude 👍👍👌👌.

Eric Gee

this is exactly why I'll continue to support you on Patreon and when you choose to run for public office.

Ryan Blushke

I’m of the opinion that transparency is a good thing, so I don’t see an issue with this change. I think it is important to separate the value of a product from the fees imposed, whether they are taxes from a government or transaction fees from a merchant. In Europe, they tell you the price, and it includes everything (taxes, fees, etc). Sometimes you totally forget how much the government is taking away, or how much Visa is charging the merchant to process a transaction! This transparency is beneficial to the consumer.

Kaz Redclaw

I wouldn't be opposed to paying for the fees as long as they didn't break the one transaction per month design of the site. With one transaction per month and only one fee per transaction, it would be a mere $4 or so per month of increase. With the arbitrary payments scattered throughout the month and every transaction being a separate charge to my credit card, that fee increase is closer to $35-40, my bank statement is going to get flooded with tiny transactions making it hard to tell how much I'm paying for patreon, hard to see anything else I'm spending, and hard to budget for Patreon. They should do Proration to sync all the payments instead of using anniversary payments.

Peter Campbell

Its a crappy thing for patreon to do, as it does not need to be done and is complicating the situation for everyone. As a UK patreon supporter of you and another creator, by the time the exchange rate plays into it, I am not going to notice it too much, as it still fits into what I have put away for this. But it is a concern if this is the first step towards further changes.

Chris Holtzer

I love the idea of Patreon, but Jack can't seem to stop pushing it toward every other curated content site. Between the Lauren Southern thing, and now this, Jack can't seem to stop shooting his creators in the foot and pissing off Patrons. There are many solutions to deal with the fee issue from CC companies (every company on the web does). Regardless what direction you go, assuming your customers should bare the financial burden (especially when it's been working thus far) is insulting. I don't want to punish Colin for Jack's bad business decisions, but this kind of thing is totally unacceptable. I'll decide how much to donate, and how he runs the back of the house is his business. I think there is fundamental misunderstanding, in that this is a donation, not a the sale of a good. You produce a great product, and I'd be happy to buy it at a fixed price, but that wasn't the initial agreement, and changing the rules of the game now is just bad form.

Anonymous

I think this is so nice good jop yes that is so nice i love your work

Steven Camilo

Thorough post, much appreciated. My pledge won't change. Thanks for the continued transparency

Anonymous

i hate i have to drop my support for now due to other issues but this might stop me from pledging to 6 creators when i can start again. i have a flat fee to pledge set aside and this will mean i have to drop 1 creator to stay at that amount. thank you as always for being open with us Colin, you are a gentleman and I appreciate it

Anonymous

Still here with you Colin. I appreciate the support that you give your patrons.

Christopher Hopkins

Can’t say I understand it, nor am I a fan of this move, it’s like when a small shop selling P2P uses PayPal and offloads transaction fees to the buyer which is wholly against PayPal policy last I checked... that said I’m pretty level headed and I’m not going to emotionally abandon my creators just because I disagree with patreon’s move here. That defeats the purpose of my patronage entirely (to help support the creators I care about) It does feel like patrons like me are being taken advantage of in how this move was done, like they’re betting on the majority to be like me and just take what they’re doing as if it’s ok, it’s not... but the alternative of abandoning my creators is the worse of two evils in this move.

David Clarke

Here's hoping they fix $1 support levels. 38% fee on a 1 dollar pledge is just insane.

Chris Nelson

Huge fan of the transparency and frank discussion, though I don't know why I'd expect anything less from Mr. Colin Moriarty. Unfortunate situation, but the way you handled it just makes me happier that I can support someone like you. Best wishes Colin

Anonymous

This is basically Patreon passing the cost of processing credit card transactions onto the consumer. I work in the credit card industry and a couple years ago Visa and MasterCard changed their regulations making it legal to do so because of merchants not wanting to pay their high fees. Some states still outlaw it, depending where the business resides. But for the most part, this is just a way for a business to pass the basis points onto the card holder. It’s a bad practice in my opinion and discourages people from consuming the products a business produces. It is a cost of doing business and should be treated as such. It will be interesting to see what happens to Patreon after this. I feel it may end up hurting the creators more than it will help them in the long run.

Anonymous

How can Patreon not understand that they need to make it as easy as possible for people to give their money to their creators?

Joshua Chap

in their backward logic this is meant to be more simple. Not sure how they came to that conclusion by making everything more of a mess.

That black guy

I'm sticking around at the same level , it's a pain that they're Charging us directly like this but I understand operating cost also this at least makes sure you creators get a bit more or our money

Daniel Ryan

I’m sad to say that due to Patreon’s decision, I’ll likely have to drop my support. I can only currently afford to support you at the low end, and along with the other 9 people I support, these fees just aren’t sustainable. I’ll look for other ways to support you in future. All the best

David Phillips

A creator first philosophy can only fail. A business must focus on the end customer if it hopes to be successful.

Ryan Blushke

That being said, after thinking about the issue for longer I do agree with lots of people in thinking that the amount they are charging and the way they are charging for transaction fees is not the best way to be doing so. It is not exactly 1:1.

first last

"I think there is fundamental misunderstanding, in that this is a donation, not a the sale of a good." - nailed it. Patreon is basically telling me that the amount I pledged to donate will be ignored and they will charge something higher instead. Also, they aren't aggregating charges so fees will be everywhere (since I make many $1 pledges).

first last

and it gets worse than that: they aren't aggregating the charge into a single transaction.