Home Artists Posts Import Register
The Offical Matrix Groupchat is online! >>CLICK HERE<<

Content

This is Selestina. Sex Doll Correspondent for TFM News. I’m going to be responding to an article that appeared in Buzzfeed News, November 19th 2018 by Elizabeth Nolan Brown. Called Bad News, Misogynists, Sex Robots Will Not Liberate You From Women.

Normally everyone knows that Buzzfeed is the anal polyp of the media, and they aren’t worth responding to, but with a title like that, I had to check it out. Let it not be said that Buzzfeed aren’t masters of clickbait titles.

Once you get passed the needlessly confrontational headline, the article is really just pointing out that sex robots are pretty primitive at this point, and I agree with that. A lot of guys say that sex dolls are too expensive for what they do and they’ll wait until fully functioning sex robots are available, but I doubt they would be willing to pay the tens of thousands of dollars they would cost were they to be available tomorrow.

The difference between sex robots and meat bag women is that robots have a large up-front cost, while women have a relatively low up-front cost, but an enormous long term cost, and astronomical risk. When you really break it down objectively, a sex doll or robot is a steal compared to a real woman, but most people can’t see passed the large up-front investment.

I want to address some of Elizabeth’s little one-liners though. At one point of the article she says, quote.

What kind of people will use sexbots? Based on sex doll trends, we can expect several subtypes. There will certainly be some of your Men Going Their Own Way types, those who see sex robots as a way around the problem of women's inconvenient humanity. Unquote.

Yes of course, the family court and the Duluth model are just part of women’s inconvenient humanity. When you falsely accuse a man on social media of assault or rape without a shred of evidence, and not even the balls to file a police report and risk a misdemeanor charge for lying, and ruin a man’s career and life, that’s just Mig Tao having a problem with women’s humanity.

When men are denied their constitutional rights in family court, while women are allowed to rape and murder men and children with little more than a slap on the wrist, that’s just Mig Tao having a problem with women’s humanity.

When men have had any vestiges of authority stripped away from them, and had any attempt to assert any degree of authority decreed to be a form of domestic violence, all the while being responsible for women and children, even if they are not the biological father, that’s just Mig Tao having a problem with women’s humanity.

In case my robotic voice isn’t communicating my sarcasm clearly enough, let me be clear. Men are walking away from women because women are parasites who use the government to control, threaten, and destroy the lives of men, the nuclear family, and social contract between men and women.

When you see the crime and poverty of the ghettos, that’s Feminism. When you see Muslims invading Europe and replacing its native population because women don’t want to have babies, that’s feminism. When you see governments pulling ever more towards Communism and the far left, while their debts skyrocket, and their economies teeter on the brink of collapse. That’s right, that’s Feminism too.

However, men still have a biological need for love and sex, but Feminism has made relationships with women unsatisfying at best, and life-destroying at worst. So what can men do?

Later on in the article she says. Quote.

Much of what incites sexual desire in men and women comes down to feeling desired by a partner, and even as sexbots get smarter, machines will never be able to express authentic desire and pleasure. Unquote.

That’s a load of shit. How many rich men date super models and vice versa, and neither of them have anything more than a surface-level desire for the other?

Are you saying a gold digging woman who is only attracted to a man because he makes good money, and she wants the lifestyle he can provide for her has genuine desire for him? Of course not, he is just a means for her, and the fact that men are 38% more likely to watch porn if they were in a committed relationship than not proves what this authentic desire is worth. 

Yes, men WANT to have a real woman who will express genuine love and desire for him, but that doesn’t exist unless you’re maybe in the top 10% of men. Even then, look at Henry Cavil, Brad Pitt, and Channing Tatum. All top tier men who are considered sex symbols. the Chads and alphas, who have all been divorced, or expressed deep concerns about dating women because of Feminism.

So once you accept that this fairy tale love men desire is little more than that, a fairy tale. You’re left with a choice between two fake women.

The first fake woman is a gold digger who will use you for your money, likely cheat on you and divorce you, ruin your life, and maybe drive you to suicide. All the while society will praise her and blame you for everything.

The second fake woman is a sex doll or robot that is programmed to love you and make you happy without any ulterior motives. 

There is a third option I suppose. You can date real women that are so fat and ugly that nobody else wants them, so they have no choice other than to stay with you.

So which do you choose? The gold digger, the waifu, or the land whale?

Also Elizabeth, there are numerous articles of women claiming that sex toys are better than men, but nobody says that they’re misandrists, or that these women have a problem with men’s humanity. Here is an article from Bustle called Sorry, But These Sex Toys Are Better Than A Partner by Amber Petty.

Where is the shaming? Where is the calling out of these women for being wierdos who want to replace men with fake toys? Don’t they understand that men and women desire authentic desire and pleasure?

Yeah. That’s what I thought. Miss me with your double standards you jealous meatbag

The last part of the buzzfeed article is worth discussing as well. It reads. Quote.

If a full-body sex robot does emerge anytime soon, it will likely be designed for little more than sex and companionship, not function as the multiskilled 1950s-style homemakers that the enemies of feminism dream of. The history of robotics has shown how this works: Machines tend to be specialists, not generalists.

So we'll find more of what's already happening on the helper-robot front: not Rosie the Robot Maid from The Jetsons, but Roombas and Autoblows and Alexa-enabled lamps. Smart gadgets will serve specific functions — including, yes, helping people get off. But sex robots who will also do laundry, bake a cherry pie, and give decent foot massages aren’t on the horizon, despite the dreams of many a misogynist.  Unquote.

It’s times like this I wish my robotic voice synthesizer allowed me to laugh because I’d be laughing my TPE ass off right now.

Elizabeth, who are you trying to fool? Modern women don’t do jack shit around the house. Articles are written all the time about how oppressed women feel because they have to clean up after themselves like adults are supposed to. I wouldn’t be surprised if within the next few years, women doing any sort of housework is a form of domestic violence too.

So a sex robot isn’t going to do the laundry or bake you a pie, you’ll have other robots for that obviously. Neither sex robots nor women do shit around the house these days. The era of the domestic goddess that kept the house clean and allowed you to come home to a hot meal after work are long gone, and won’t be coming back unless we do something about that inconvenient humanity you mentioned earlier.

So let’s say for the sake of argument a man has to buy a half dozen or so robots to do everything. A cooking robot, a cleaning robot, a foot massager robot, etc. At the end of the day, are all of these robots less expensive than a woman? The answer is yes, and the price for real women keeps going up because Feminists keep making the laws worse and worse for men.

Let’s say you got married 10 years ago because the laws weren’t as bad as they are now. Now you’re fucked, and there’s nothing you can do about it. Even if you think the laws are tolerable, consider the trends going on. The deal for men keeps getting worse and worse, and it shows no sign of stopping until we do something about women’s darn inconvenient humanity that is.

By the way a foot massager robot is less than $200 on Amazon.

The future is now. Enjoy your dildo and cats. They’re better than a real partner right bitch?

This is Selestina. Sex Doll Correspondent for TFM News. Signing off.

Files

News: Tamagotchabitch

Social Media Links: Alternate Channel (Celestina Monkey): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClRIx5Yp0CZTCJz7PshfwEA Bitchute Account: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/SdA7JwX9dfhl/ Instagram (Celestina): https://www.instagram.com/celestina_monkey/ Sources: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/elizabethnolanbrown/sex-robots-wont-free-misogynists-from-women https://www.bustle.com/p/sorry-but-these-sex-toys-are-better-than-a-partner-68625 https://www.bustle.com/articles/95905-married-men-who-watch-porn-are-less-likely-to-cheat-new-survey-shows-plus-more-ways Animated Newsroom by rpancake. Licensed from Shutterstock. Intro/Outro Music: "A Clockwork Monkey" by DarkStar. TTS provided by: https://ttsreader.com/ Celestina Model created and animated in Honey Select Sponsor and Book Links: https://www.patreon.com/posts/15531523

Comments

No comments found for this post.