News: Robot Sex Rx - Transcript (Patreon)

This is Selestina. Sex Doll Correspondent for TFM News. I’m going to be responding to an article that appeared in the Washington Post. June 4th 2018 by Ben Guarina. Called New report finds no evidence that having sex with robots is healthy.

Before we dive into this article I’d like to point out that vibrators and sex toys for women are hailed for their health benefits. I’ll link to a 2017 article that appeared in Net Doctor Dot Co Dot UK called Should sex toys be prescribed by doctors? 

I’d like to quote one section from the article, which reads. Quote.

"I have encountered several doctors including GPs and gynaecologists who will not recommend sex toys because of their own personal views and embarrassment about sex. However, once healthcare professionals learn about sex toys and sexual lubricants and see what products can really help, they often change their mind."

Samantha says increasingly doctors are seeing vibrators as the way forward for helping people overcome intimate health issues. Unquote.

Isn’t that interesting. Health professionals were originally against recommending sex toys because of their own personal views, but then changed their mind later after seeing that they can help women overcome intimate health issues.

Really gets the old motherboard humming doesn’t it?

Now let’s return to the Washington Post article, which reads. Quote.

Sex doll maker Realbotix, in its marketing materials, bills Harmony as “the perfect companion.”

But healthy companionship is too bold a claim to make about sex robots, warn a pair of doctors in a report published Monday in the journal BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health. 

Later on it reads.

No primary research data on sex robots exists, the doctors concluded. “We advise that sexbots shouldn’t be used in medical practice,” Cox-George said, “at least not unless that forms part of robust and ethical research.” Unquote

So the point they’re trying to make is that it’s too soon to scientifically conclude that sex robots make healthy alternatives to human companions. Okay, I can understand that. Sex robot technology is in its infancy after all, so I can appreciate the fact that no studies have been conducted, or if studies have begun, they’ve only just begun within the last year or so, and it’s far too soon to form conclusions. Studies take time after all.

However, later on in the article it reads. Quote.

Though scientists frequently say more research is needed, clinical experimentation with sexbots, in Richardson's view, risks driving research funds into environments where people have sex with machines. Unquote.

So wait. Back the fuck up. Scientists are saying that sex robots shouldn’t be marketed as companions because there are no studies which back up that claim, but that they also don’t want studies being conducted because they don’t want research funds going to people having sex with machines.

Excuse me, but what about all the studies regarding sex toys for women? What were they doing exactly other than having sex with machines? I’ll link a 2009 Indiana University study in the description called Vibrator Use Common, Linked To Sexual Health.

In this study. You’ll never believe this, so prepare your anus. This study actually caused research funds to go to people having sex with machines.

I know. I know. It’s crazy. Won’t someone please think of the children right? 

Seriously though. Cut the fucking shit. Enough with the blatant double standard against sex toys for men in favor of sex toys for women. When a woman has sex with a machine its empowerment, it’s healthy, it’s socially acceptable. When a man has sex with a machine, it’s rape, it’s unhealthy, it’s creepy.

I’d say for you to go fuck yourselves, but you already do remember? You’ve been fucking yourself for decades and touting the benefits of it countless times. Now that men want the same freedom and benefits that women have enjoyed, we need to shut it down. Can’t let men have sex with machines now can we? why that might lead to rape or something.

So while we don’t have studies which contradict the Feminist narrative regarding sex dolls and robots because they’re new and Feminism doesn’t want to fund them. we actually do have studies from a parallel field which is built along similar lines, and shows how full of shit the Feminist narrative always is.

Let’s look at an article which appeared on the website one angry gamer dot net called SEXUALIZED VIDEO GAME FEMALES REDUCE RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE AND HOSTILE SEXISM, STATES STUDY. 

This study, which was published in March 2018 was conducted to see whether or not sexualized video game characters encouraged rape myth acceptance and hostile sexism or not.

According to the article. Quote.

after testing 300 US college students who either played or watched someone play as a sexualized and non-sexualized female avatar in a video game, they discovered that participants actually had reduced rape myth acceptance and reduced hostile sexism toward women.

In the words of the study directly. The study concluded. Quote.

Results contradicted hypotheses that greater task demands and sexualization would produce greater RMA, hostile sexism, and self-objectification. Instead, we found that sexualization did not affect these variables. Greater cognitive load reduced rape myth acceptance and hostile sexism for those in the sexualized avatar condition, but it did not affect self-objectification. Unquote

So in other words, while playing as a sexy female character didn’t reduce their attraction to sexy females, it did reduce hostile sexism and rape myth acceptance. 

Now you probably noticed a lot of uses of the term rape myth acceptance. This is a feminist term loosely associated with the feminist concept of patriarchal rape culture. It would be too time consuming to get into that subject now, but the important thing to remember is that videogames which overtly objectify women and allow you to play sexy women in revealing outfits. not only do not exacerbate feminist rape culture according to feminist own definition, but has the exact opposite result.

Additionally, sexualized female characters actually reduced and did not exacerbate hostile sexism, and again, this was a study conducted by Feminists and using their own definitions of terms.

So according to a 2018 study conducted by Feminists themselves, sexy videogame characters reduce sexism and rape culture. Let me repeat that because it bares repeating. Sexy video game characters which objectify women and trigger them because of their jiggle physics and revealing clothing. Reduce sexism towards women, and reduce even feminist defined rape culture.

We also know from other studies that violent video games not only do not contribute to an increase in violent crime, but have the opposite effect. Violent video games are proven to lower actual violent crime.

The point is that Feminism is already zero for two when it comes to videogames. Video games lower violent crime and reduce sexism and rape culture.

Feminism also touts the health benefits of sex toys for women, and has for years. Yet despite their track record of failure and double standards, they want us to believe that sex dolls and robots aren’t healthy or beneficial.

Kiss my thermoplastic elastomer ass.

This is Selestina. Sex Doll Correspondent for TFM News. Signing Off.