Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

In this bonus episode, Lauren and Gretchen get enthusiastic about what we've been up to in 2022 (much travel for Gretchen, with linguistic impressions of Singapore, Australia, and New Zealand!) and what's coming up for 2023 (a second tiny human, er, longitudinal language acquisition project for Lauren, which means you'll get a few more interview episodes from Gretchen's travels). 

We also talk about our favourite linguistics paper that we read in 2022 slash possibly ever: okay, yes, academic papers don't typically do this, but this paper has spoilers, so we STRONGLY recommend reading it yourself before listening to this episode. It's only three pages long, you don't need any technical background, and we promise it's worth it. Here's the first section, do at least glance at it even if you're not going to click the link: 

The orthography of English has a very simple basis for establishing where words in written texts begin and end: both before and also after every word are empty spaces and this demarcation surely helps the reader comprehend. In a spoken text, however, as presented to a hearer, such explicit segmentation cues are rarely to be found; little pauses after every single word might make things clearer, but the input is continuous - a running stream of sound. This implies that part of listening involves an operation whereby input is segmented, to be processed word by word, for we cannot hold in memory each total collocation, as most sentences we come across are previously unheard. 
Yet we listeners experience no sense of some dramatic act of separating input into pieces that are known; as we listen to an utterance it seems unproblematic-words in sentences seem just as clear as words that stand alone. Just how listeners accomplish such an effortless division is a question that psychologists have now begun to solve, and this paper will describe (although with minimal precision) some experimental studies showing what it might involve. The findings, as this summary explains, at once can vindicate the order of the problem and the hearer’s sense of ease, for though speech must be segmented, yet the data plainly indicate that rhythm in the input makes segmenting speech a breeze. (Here's a pdf of the whole Anne Cutler paper.)

Announcements:
We’re doing another Lingthusiasm liveshow! February 18th at 4pm (Montreal time) slash 19th at 8am (Melbourne time)! (What time is that for me?) We'll be returning to one of our fan-favourite topics and answering your questions about language and gender with returning special guest Dr. Kirby Conrod! We’ll be hosting this session for patrons on the Lingthusiasm Discord server. It will also be available as an edited-for-legibility recording in your usual Patreon live feed if you prefer to listen at a later date. In the meantime: ask us questions or tell us about your favourite examples of gender in various languages in the comments on this post and we might include them in the show! If you have access to this bonus episode on Patreon, you already have access to the liveshow, just make sure you have your Patreon and Discord accounts connected (you can make a free Discord account if need be).

We always post updates about the podcast here on Patreon, but if you're looking to keep up with the show in other places, we're on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and now Mastadon! You can also sign up to our newsletter to get the latest news to your inbox. 

Here are the links mentioned in this episode:

You can listen to this episode on this page, via the Patreon RSS or download the mp3. A transcript of this episode is available as a Google Doc. Lingthusiasm is also on Facebook, Tumblr, Twitter, and Mastodon. Email us at contact [at] lingthusiasm [dot] com or chat to us on the Patreon page. Gretchen is on Twitter as @GretchenAMcC and blogs at All Things Linguistic. Lauren is on Twitter as @superlinguo and blogs at Superlinguo.

To chat about this episode and other lingthusiastic topics with your fellow linguistics fans, join us on the Lingthusiasm Discord server.

Lingthusiasm is created by Gretchen McCulloch and Lauren Gawne. Our senior producer is Claire Gawne, our production editor is Sarah Dopierala, and our production assistant is Martha Tsutsui Billins. Our music is ‘Ancient City’ by The Triangles.

Files

Comments

enchantedsleeper

Me reading the excerpted section of the paper: Hmm, seems cool, okay... yep... wait WAIT A SECOND

Anonymous

Well! I find it quite incredible that many do not see all the awkward phrasing, bouncy rhythms (plenty of trochee) in this paper which -- in my attempt to read it, anyway -- gave its secrets up while paragraph-the-first was underway. Now I'm wondering: what separates me from the common crowd? Do I parse the text sublingually? Is that just like "read aloud?" I, for one, would desperately love to see this test much more widely replicated (massive sample size is best) and especially with care to see if patterns are emergent between subjects neuro-typical and those who are -divergent. Myself, I fall into the category which is latter, and suspect that information could significantly matter. This was just a little exercise for me, a pleasant game; rather shocking that apparently for most, it's not the same!

Anonymous

OH MY GODS OH MY GODS I read the paper before listening to the episode and not only did I NOT NOTICE the rhythm and the rhymes all the way through, I was QUESTIONING the validity of the conclusion about the Christmas letter, because how could she be sure people really hadn't noticed it and how could you miss something like that anyway, surely the poetic-ness would stand out pretty sharply, AND I READ THE WHOLE PAPER AND WENT HUH I DON'T SEE WHAT'S SO INTERESTING ABOUT IT I GUESS I'LL FIND OUT IN THE EPISODE AND FUTDVJFDHKKFDVJFSVJYDCHKG<{] ;|}] <>{} <>{{<< oh my gods anyway yeah I'm not questioning her conclusion anymore 😂

Jennifer Lemon

I don't see a link for the MP3

Anonymous

Hey, at least on iPhone the core link for the cutler paper doesn’t work, and the elsevier link has it behind the paywall

Anonymous

I think this is the paper? Went to google scholar and put in the first quoted sentence. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/15628/6033.pdf

Anonymous

Hope this one works for you! https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/15628/6033.pdf

Anonymous

Yes, thanks! This is delightful! I could tell the rhythm was very speechlike but I have to admit I didn’t quite get it till the very end

Anonymous

I loved this so much. I knew Anne Cutler, but did not know about the fantastic Christmas letters - great to hear about them!

Anonymous

You can download the mp3 by clicking on the three dots next to the like and the share buttons on the post, then click on "download".

Morgaine

I had a similar experience, the odd phrasing and the rhyming especially gave the game away within the first couple of sentances. I definitely subvocalise, especially with non-fiction. Though I also wonder how big a part the forewarning played, being on the lookout and knowing that the paper was about the rhythms of language.

Anonymous

Did you notice that my comment you replied to followed the same structure? That might give you some measure of whether the forewarning affected your ability to catch it!

Morgaine

Yes, I feel like I was primed for that though. But what you said about the subvocalisation is intriguing, I'd never considered that others didn't do the same. And for reference I'm also not neuro-typical.