Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

It was brought to my attention that some Patrons may like covered versions of my work better than the uncovered ones, which is something that never occurred to me really. I try to paint things that you don't see everyday, usually sensual or erotic or just fantastic, and clothes you can see every day (unless you live in a nudist resort). Even the latex variety, although that's much less common. Now that I know that I may have a case of tunnel vision, I'll post a covered  Patron version as well, which means the same image as for Facebook and such, but without the sheer credit bar, which is often pretty dominant (for good reason mind you). 

Would that be a good thing or am I wasting time with it? 

Files

Comments

Silvador

If it doesn't create extra work for you, I see no reason not to do it. Admittedly, I enjoy the less clothed (and even more explicit) versions, than the more clothed ones, most of the time, but if people like the clothed versions, as well, why not? As for the credit bar; just a personal opinion, it's never bothered me. It's relatively discrete and non-invasive, unlike some watermarks that are big and cover half the image, making it near impossible to enjoy the artwork.

Dalek Supreme

I am one that likes your clothed or lingerie versions. There is a lot of naked images out there but not enough that have the element of tease and titillation.

FransMensinkArtist

Thank you! I always thought censoring my work by adding cover was just a way to be able to use the mainstream media elegantly (I mean, putting ugly bars or apples over details to not upset the authorities is hardly an elegant solution). I never thought anyone would prefer that over the true form. Well, I learned something again which is never bad.

Lawrence Wise

Seems like her zipper is stuck. I'll help.