Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

The Nakamoto coefficient is a measure of decentralization in a blockchain network. It is calculated by dividing the number of nodes required to control 51% of the network's power by the total number of nodes in the network. 

A high Nakamoto coefficient indicates that the network is decentralized, as it would be difficult for any single entity to control a majority of the network's hash power. This makes it more difficult for a single entity to manipulate the network or censor transactions. 

A low Nakamoto coefficient indicates that the network is centralized, as it would be easier for a single entity to control a majority of the network's power. This makes it more likely that a single entity could manipulate the network or censor transactions. 

The Nakamoto coefficient is important when determining whether or not a token is a security. The Howey Test, which is used by the SEC to determine whether or not an investment is a security, includes the following factor: Whether the investment is offered and sold as part of a common enterprise.  If a token is part of a decentralized network with a high Nakamoto coefficient, it is less likely to be considered an investment contract under the Howey Test. This is because it would be difficult for a single entity to control the network and manipulate the price of the token.

Full List




Files

Comments

Anonymous

Now that is some great KPM!

Anonymous

James I must echo Pkgman's sentiment that I believe the Nakamoto Coefficient means naught here. The Howie Test and other concerns are what are important to the US government. Why is Solana's archenemy Avalanche absent from the SEC's list? https://crypto.bi/avax-ripple/ I am definitely not an expert like yourself. But I read this old article to see how Avalanche has been able to protect itself from the SEC.

Anonymous

... and yet SOL is on the list...

Anonymous

Can anybody remind me how to access the community forum/discussions/spreadsheets etc? 🙏🏼

Anonymous

“The Nakamoto coefficient is important when determining whether or not a token is a security.” There is absolutely zero evidence to support this, the whole premise is made up wish casting. The SEC has spoke; loud and clear, all assets besides BTC are a security, aka nakamoto-not Gianna matter o. There have been zero court cases on a judge ruling I’d the SEC is correct or not. We are in limbo. Again zero evidence to think a judge will care anything about this.

Anonymous

New regulation that disregards the Howe test, and creates new clear defined rails for “digital assets” is the only way through this mess.

Anonymous

the SEC might not care about the NC, but I'm not saying it would be irrelevant in court.

Anonymous

What’s the low for SOL I’m buying all the way down at the moment 🤷🏽‍♂️🥇

Anonymous

thanks a lot

Anonymous

At these prices for SOL I would say it is hard not to aquire more. I had not planned too! 😂

Anonymous

James, thanks for grinding and encouraging us all through another season of challenge. A lot to weigh if one's life and company's reserves are invested in the space. Sharing your approach and allocations has been really encouraging to me this week.

Anonymous

Fantom isn't on the hitlist!

Anonymous

Hi James I spoke with Monty Metzger the CEO from LCX and he want to talk to you and explain the strategy and fact all assets are locked and they are legally completely checked in Liechtenstein and have to keep assets etc locked up and have every time checks from government etc. So how can he reach you ?