Home Artists Posts Import Register
The Offical Matrix Groupchat is online! >>CLICK HERE<<

Content

Going live w George from @CryptosR_Us and Rob from @NewsAsset at 9.30am PT/11.30CST/4.30pm UTC - discussing the #CryptoMarket and the week ahead! Cya there. https://buff.ly/39EZHVE

https://youtu.be/eqrilDZ-stE

Files

DCA Live w George from CrUS and Rob from DAN and IA at 9.30am PT

Comments

Anonymous

Cani wait

Anonymous

Looking forward to this!

Anonymous

Good stuff! Excited to hear your take on the current state of crypto market

Anonymous

Thanks james

Anonymous

WOW OMG!!!!! I have just gone from 1 Bitcoin to 5670 Bitcoin thanks to crypto expert Abu Aguwanawanna from Nigeria. As he is completely above board I had to do KYC check for him, so I sent my passport, property deeds, bank details, crypto password, family dog and my favourite mug. Thank you so much Abu. Whatsapp him on 5537800855378008

Anonymous

Many thanks James, you guys adjusting time to reach us in Europe is awesome . Keep up the wonderful work

Anonymous

Uncanny

Anonymous

Can't wait

Anonymous

And my Sunday will be complete!! 😁

Anonymous

Can’t wait, do you guys do a fantastic job

Rajeev Nagabhirava

James, looking forwards to the discussion. If you could discuss VGX token(all three of you recommended it before)

Anonymous

Hey guys love you all, would love your opinion.... if you bought a very low cap token where you get like 1bn tokens for $20 and it goes up stupidly like 10 mil % how do you sell/swap/transfer them to realise the rewards

Anonymous

Awesome. Also James thanks to you I changed my LO for BTC last night ( I was being chinsy! ) and upped it to 41k from 39k and it hit around 1am. You are truly the best. Honoured to be here. Thank-you ! 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

Anonymous

Can’t wait

Anonymous

awesome! Just in time for my drive here me from the mountains 😍🚙

Anonymous

looking forward to it, James. TY

Anonymous

Out for a hike "Wild Basin Preserve" Austin, TX. Enjoy the live show all! I'll catch the recording :)

Anonymous

Perfect 🙌

Anonymous

Three really great dudes talking crypto. Coffee and crypto and lazy Seattle Sunday morning.

Anonymous

@BMC, sure would like to know. Some people waiting to get on, didn't know scammers had a shot at it. Dommage vraiment.

Anonymous

James you are the best, thank you for all you do for us and the animals,

Anonymous

Wow, managed to get to the livestream for once.

Anonymous

Did I actually make it to a live show? Love the group, it has become my nightly news show that I never miss with a nice glass of single malt. Excellent trusted information that I act on and see results. Thanks so much to the whole team that keep IA operational.

Anonymous

Depends on the exchange but overall - stay clear of such tokens. Pure speculation and they rarely make it worth your time - trust me, had a few "hail Mary" bets myself... ;-)

Anonymous

Love when the three of you have a join stream - saves me some time watching three separate videos... ;-)

Anonymous

Very interesting James - Thank you.

Anonymous

Great moderating, James. You all complement each other well. Love the content.

Anonymous

I wait until I get home after work on a Sunday evening. Headphones, DCA, music to my ears. Love it. You know who my favourite is. 💫

Anonymous

Love George!!!

Anonymous

❤️

Anonymous

Great time to watch for those in old blighty 🇬🇧👍

Anonymous

Super content My takeaways • xrp , as a speculative play only. 5% hold ok, 50% definitely not! • Matic,, looks undervalued , layer 2 unfashionable ? But it has its role &amp; should pump. • Eth , big beast , how can it do x3 or x4 ; probably only x2.5 for this market cycle . •Solana , terra , Avax easier pumps cos smaller market caps. • George’s take on portfolio position sizes: ~50% Bitcoin &amp; Eth ~30% major caps &gt; 10bn market cap ( coins that have proven themselves) ~ 20% smaller caps Also liked his idea: don’t diversify your portfolio too soon , eg if you know crypto , stick to it, understand it thoroughly … build your wealth in it … then diversify . This makes so much sense , it’s hard to master too many asset classes ! Do then one spreads investment knowledge too thinly . The risk of coming unstuck is much higher then .

Anonymous

Question regarding my portfolio to the group, I am considering swapping some of my xrp for either DOT, or MATIC which would you choose and why? Or would you choose a different coin? Lmk, I own no MATIC but I do own dot

Anonymous

I am looking to scale out some of xrp bc of potential risk and uncertainty

Anonymous

This might not have been a competition but James has proven a winner at on the fly questions. The poise is pure.

Anonymous

I don't mean to be overcritical, but I feel Rob provides no value to crypto conversations and George is a confident speaker but not creative. I was subscribed to Rob, but unsubscribed and I've never seen George's channel. I've tried watching DCA, but don't see the payoff. James is the only one worth watching on DCA, but he is such a gentleman he gives Rob and George the floor quite a bit. Thank goodness James is solo the rest of the week.

Anonymous

Yes there are levels and they become glaringly obvious when held up to each other. I appreciate Rob as the “layman” of the group though he does pass on question to George 95% of the time! I would much rather see James dedicating that time to an hour of technical analysis. Maybe James gets a lot out of it and that is important too. Personally I’m just waiting for James to speak, which he does less of when moderating. Constructive criticism is useful when respectfully shared.

Anonymous

I totally get that James may be doing it for the community aspect of it. He does work hard and talking shop with fellow crypoknights is probably a good thing for him socially. I wish James just took Sunday off and focused on non-crypto stuff. Burnout is real in crypto. We gotta keep James healthy until we all retire from crypto. :)

Anonymous

I follow George and he knows his shit. Rob sits on the fence. James we love obviously. My two sats!

Anonymous

For those wanting macro view.. Btc has been in downtrend since Biden took control of treasury and sec. Communists always try to kill what they can not control. No significant move upward until change in administration

Anonymous

My POV: I think It’s all about building appropriate position sizes. So the question is : what % of your portfolio is Dot? And what % of your portfolio are “platform” coins as a category ( ie dot, Eth, sol, terra ,Avax, Ada). In my portfolio they are 36%, (which is actually a touch low because “platform” coins are the biggest sub sector of crypto by far, and imo, a solidly constructed portfolio should reflect that market dominance) The idea is to be invested in the best names in the space because short term ( bull run ) all will do well. Each will have its time in the sun. If you are happy with your position size in the platform coins, then Matic , as a layer 2 solution becomes a good choice. There are quite a few commentators whose portfolio logic I respect who believe Matic now is due a pump. ( Coinbureau, cryptorus, investanswers). But interestingly in Coinbureau s portfolio , it accounts for only 2%or so. That’s the position size I too have taken in my portfolio.

Anonymous

Again depends what % age of your portfolio it is. My approach is to think of Xrp as sn “ aggressive “ coin , and as a rule of thumb, I won’t it more than 3% into an aggressive. Yes , it limits the upside , if the punt pumps! But importantly, it limits the downside too. My position in Xrp is 1%. As George said: it warrants a place in a portfolio, but not too big a place . If it pumps , ( a win over the SEC ), it will pum big ,and even a small position will give a worthwhile return. But I am with George, Xrp is not a coin I want in my portfolio longer term.

Anonymous

I think this episode benefited from having fewer questions for James to get through. Felt like James had to rush the answers to get through them all last week. Great show as usual.

Anonymous

I agree that it is good to hear different perspectives but only when the discussion is among people of the same level of expertise . Now, I am not saying that Rob and George are less intelligent than James but when it comes to James’ economic background, the difference is too great and there is little to no value as far as what you can get out of the conversation. George and Rob’s theories are better described as “I feel that…” wheareas James’ are based on real fundamental/ quant/ objective analysis. DCA feels like an Adult having a conversation with two little children in my humble opinion. Apologies if it sounds rude, I don’t mean to disrespect anybody. But less is more, so for now Investanswers is the only channel that I follow out of the three. Also, idk why but I have this weird feeling that Rob and George are gonna get jealous and are going to somehow try to hurt James’ reputation or conspire against him…. Idk I guess im too paranoid. I feel bad about judging other people and I hope im wrong…

Anonymous

I know I’m in the right group, because I had the same thought as many of you. James is king. George is very optimistic (which is his charming and makes him likable) and in my opinion good for news only. Rob leaves me indifferent. But all three seem to have a very nice connection with each other that makes it worth viewing.

Anonymous

Actually, George has some more depth to him, as demonstrated on his channel when he alone is presenting.

Anonymous

Why do we need to compare any of them at all? They got together to make this show and they all contribute value in their own light greater than they each could do on their own. They all present different perspectives on the market and each are intelligent in their own right.

Anonymous

You clearly don’t know what a communist is. Please don’t bring your political talking points in here when they are pure nonsense.

Anonymous

I think dialogue is important. James obviously a master at synthesising actionable insights from detailed analysis . He is equally comfortable with big picture stuff as he is with the detailed nitty gritty analysis , which is rare. And he is not full of himself, which many you tubers are🙁. He is a rare &amp; valuable beast in the doacw. I like George, and I think he has value. Rob , on his showing this episode, is out of his depth … but then perhaps he is there to represent the unseasoned retail investor ( and I am one😇). All in all, I really like this format.

Anonymous

Wow, this format has improved further, since James takes the lead! 👍👍

Anonymous

Hey John M, can you please provide what a communist is? Sir, it is glaringly evident you need to put the blue pills away. I mean no insult or disrespect but it is important that we all understand what is really going on today with the central banks and the corrupt politicians. What they are planning for the “eaters” ( you and I) is not good. If you love crypto and what it can do for you, you better take a red pill once in awhile because if the illegitimate government gets its way, you can kiss crypto goodbye. I would love to have a discussion with you sir outside of this group as its for crypto not politics. Just trying to enlighten and possibly also learn from others. God bless you all and and to all of our success

Anonymous

James, love the banter with the guys but (for me at least) it feels like you are just asking them questions for the most part, I very much like their answers but WANT to hear your answer or point of view the most. Please include yourself in all answers if possible.

Anonymous

I think everyone will agree that this isn’t the forum for this type of discussion. There are certainly corrupt politicians on both sides of the aisle. Just please leave the political party bashing alone so this board doesn’t become toxic.

Anonymous

I think the improved structure is a good thing but that James should give at least an equal amount of opinions/answers as the other 2. He is contributing less and facilitating more at the moment. I understand why he is doing this but I think it’s too imbalanced considering the high value of his input.

Anonymous

I prefer when George is the Host…for the simple reason that we get to hear more from James and his analysis. I like all 3 gentlemen and I thank them for their time and efforts. On a side note, I prefer the Sunday evening format if that matters to anyone.

Anonymous

Not sure this has ever been stated, but James thumbnails are what legit crypto channels should aspire too. They exude professionalism and legitimacy to what he has to offer. Almost all others look like a sales advertisement for Walmart.

Anonymous

I think the exact%ages don’t matter, as much as the principle behind the logic of being btc/Eth heavy in allocation. My understanding of it is this: btc allocation serves 3,purposes . •At 40-50% of ones portfolio it reflects btc dominance in the overall crypto market ( €800 bn out of $2 T) • it acts as ballast against the extreme volatility of alt coins • it is a legitimate &amp; proven store of value Eth allocation serves 2 purposes • it is standard bearer for largest ( and biggest growing ) category of crypto coins , namely platform for Dapps . • a 20% allocation would reflect its dominance in the space ( in terms of its $ 400bn mc ) and a higher allocation 25-30% , would reflect that it will likely be the biggest winner in the platform wars, in terms of eventual market share ( of a much larger overall crypto market value). So, I am clear that a “mature” crypto portfolio today woul be very btc &amp; Eth centric. By mature, I mean a portfolio that already has generated big returns ( wealth creation ) and so the emphasis now is on mitigating market risks to that part of portfolio value ( “wealth preservation”). Then it makes perfect sense that btc/Eth/sol/dot/ ada … might make up 90 % of the portfolio value . If the game is “wealth creation” however then perhaps as much 30% of the portfolio would be in mid cap coins ( with appropriate position sizes in the eco systems of ones favourite platform coins, in the main). Obviously there are other markets nfts etc. But they are niche plays and would not constitute a major part of the portfolio allocation. Nor would moonshot candidates. A good success rate would be 1 out of 10 makes a x50 return, and the other 9 fade into nothing! Then, out of $ 10k invested ($1k per punt) $9k is lost, against $50K made. The already wealthy focus on wealth preservation and the wannabe wealthy on wealth creation. The main thing is not take unnecessary risk in the drive toward the latter objective.