Home
Artists
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register
Partychan Telegram Live Sex ThePornDude
Home Artists Posts Import Register

FULL LENGTH HARRY POTTER & THE GOBLET OF FIRE REACTION - DC #1 for June '23 (Patreon)

Published:
2023-06-06 06:16:47
Imported:

Files

fl hp 4.mp4 - Onehub

Onehub is a web application that provides everything you need to easily and securely share business information and files with partners, customers, coworkers, and suppliers.

Comments

Kyle

This is probably the worst one but the next one is pretty much the best.

Jonathan Giles

Well that was depressing lol. Did enjoy the plot twist...... Definitely getting darker each film. Can't wait to see what's next. Still hoping to see Hogwarts Legacy after The last of us. Thanks

Ninaofthe90s

??? yeah of course they are only 14. One school year for each movie. In the first they were 11, then 12, last year 13 and now 14. if you're 17 then it's your last year in hogwarts. All three main actors were actually 14-15 when they made the movie. 👍 Radcliffe, Watson and Grint were born 1989, 1990 and 1988, the movie was shot 2004. Grint is the oldest, but he was still 15 when they started shooting. And in the movie a year passes so at the end of the movie, most of the characters have turned 15 (except Harry, his birthday is in July, during summer break). Robert Pattinson, born 1986 was 18 when he shot the movie, playing a 17 year old. Even if you don't buy it, they are appropriately cast 🙂 This isn't Jennifer Lawrence playing a 16-17 year old when she was 23. 😂 Also none of those three look like 17, 18,19 or 20! 😂😂😂😂 they don't look even remotely like grown-ups...they're teenagers. They looked just as old as me when this movie came out, since we're about the same age.

Ninaofthe90s

Also we have three actors from In Bruges. Ralph Fiennes of course, Brendan Gleeson and Clémence Poésy, (Fleur Delacour) who played Chloe in "In Bruges". But it's not that special, considering that most british actors were in this franchise. At that time it was probably more unusual if you were british and you were NOT in the Harry Potter movies. A bit like Marvel. 😁 Also: that was Robert Pattinson's first movie. So we have Harry Potter to thank for that too 😎

Kyle
>>110116906

This is the first time I've seen anyone say anything positive about it.

TouchTheGarlic

I knew you would love Brendan Gleeson in this movie. And don’t worry, Sirius, Snape and Lucius all have great material coming up. With a massive ensemble cast like this, not everyone can get the spotlight every movie, but they do all get their due eventually.

Light Yagami
>>110116597

I would say the exact opposite. This is maybe the best one. 5th is…. Meh imo

Kim Carragher

Genuinely surprised with how much you liked it, a lot of ppl do not because it takes great liberties with the book content (some of which is honestly a little more effed up, bc Hermione discovers Skeeter turns into a bug to spy on ppl and then she traps her in a jar. For a YEAR.) but I get it, Gleason is great and the Unforgivable Curses lesson is truly horrifying. (I don’t know if you caught it, but David Tennants character was arrested for using the Torture Curse on Neville’s parents; hence his reaction to seeing it being used.) We are absolutely with you on the adults being horrendously dangerous to the kids, but it’s an ongoing issue with the wizard world - a general carelessness with people’s lives.