Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content


Files

Tolarian Winds: Mastering Masterpieces - A Magic: The Gathering VLOG

Don't forget to check out "Are Challenger Decks really Standard Masters?" by clicking here: https://youtu.be/B6KhAkTYkxU Jace vs. Urza - https://youtu.be/dIC-PCMNqLE Lore Analysis, Garruk vs. Liliana: https://youtu.be/o6X0Vpytp2w Tolarian Community College is brought to you by Card Kingdom! You can support The Professor just by checking out their store through this link: http://www.cardkingdom.com/TCC Standard Masters Graphic by Josh Putz - @TheProxyGuy TCC Shirts! Playmats! - http://www.tolariancommunitycollege.com/ Support The Professor - Patreon -https://www.patreon.com/tolariancommunitycollege Come hang out and play Magic with me on Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/tolariancommunitycollege Twitter: https://twitter.com/TolarianCollege FaceBook: https://www.facebook.com/TolarianCommunityCollege "Vintage Education" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ On August 29, 2015 actor and nerdy counter culture icon Wil Wheaton excitedly tweeted out four words: Full. Frame. Dual. Lands. and I along with most of Magic: The Gathering’s online community first learned about Expeditions, ultra mythic rare lottery cards that would show up approximately 1 per case of Battle For Zendikar. In all 45 land cards were included in the Battle For Zendikar 2 set block, ranging from the original Zendikar fetchlands and Ravnica shocklands, Battle for Zendikar’s brand new and dubiously named Battle Lands (show on screen #TeamHaveLands, #TeamTangoLands, #TeamLandLands)) While Battle For Zendikar block itself is, for many players, the distinct starting point of a declining era of declining gameplay and other assorted problems, and the block that Magic R&D figurehead Mark Rosewater recently said would be his top choice to completely erase from Magic The Gathering’s history, WOW, but despite all this Expeditions were quite popular and coveted prizes, so much so that beginning with Kaladesh block they were made a permanent feature of all Magic sets going forward, named Masterpieces and designed for each set with set block appropriate themes and frames. Well, I say “permanent” because they intended to be so, but in reality, Masterpieces lasted only TWO blocks: Kaladesh and Amonkhet, after which they were quickly discontinued as a regular feature and now declared to appear only intermittently in special and very important sets. They have no been seen since, but with the upcoming set Dominaria being the 25 year anniversary set, a set returning for the first time in over a decade to the original plane of Magic The Gathering, a set focussing on nostalgia, old lore and characters, and set with theme of history, players thought surely this was the perfect place for Masterpieces to return. After all, how better to celebrate a quarter of a century of Magic: The Gathering than with Dominaria Masterpieces? The opportunities were endless: the set specific custom frame could be designed to be reminiscent of the original Magic: The Gathering frame, the artwork could either be original artwork of iconic cards or, if rights really are that impossible to procure to these old pieces, new pieces in the style and spirit of the original alpha set could have been commissioned, possibly even using classic artists. However, as of the filming of this video, unless Wizards of the Coast plans the most epic of epic surprises, it appears that there are NO Masterpieces in Dominaria, begging the question: if not where than where? And why? Why have them at all? Since their first appearance in Zendikar to their messy final showing in Amonkhet, Masterpieces have been a great idea that was implemented very, very poorly. On the whole, I feel these are a good idea, and I think most players would have liked to see Masterpieces return with Dominaria. Despite the fiasco of Amonkhet Invocations, Players weren’t saying they wanted Masterpieces gone, but rather, they were saying they wanted them done right.

Comments

Anonymous

I really love the new direction. Keep up the hard work. I'm so proud to be a patreon of yours now. I'm now really excited to be getting a signed land from you. Thank you so much. Bravo, bravo. Your are a true legend.

Anonymous

The biggest change to masterpieces I would like to see is less of them. In Amonket there were 25 with varying value. Straight up one of the things that stopped me and many of my friends from trying to get one was that we looked at the spread and basically decided we didnt wanna buy boxes on the chance that we get one and it is a spell pierce. at most I think there should be 10. A cycle of lands (fetches or shocks or whatever) and 5 notable creatures/spells. While the spells dont have to be themed they can still totally be in flavor with the set. I mean cards like Force of Will which is a highly sought after card fits fine in Amonket where you have a blue god like Kefnet who would image can cast spells like that. For sure that was a good masterpiece to print. My friend pulled one in draft and it seriously was such a positive experience. I on the other hand pulled a boil. Not quite as exciting..... I probably would have drafted more of the set though and bought more product if the invocations were just better and there were fewer of them.

Anonymous

There's a big problem with reducing the number of masterpieces in a set, which relates to the frequency of a card. In the current printing rate, any given masterpiece of expedition is about the rarity of any particular foil common. Unless you're going to make them much rarer than 1 per case, it's difficult to print them at these rates without flooding the market and causing the value of the cards to greatly reduce.

Anonymous

You nailed this one Professor! If done right masterpieces are a win for everyone. Longtime players with eternal format decks can get excited about adding bling to their decks, and new players can trade them for handfuls of staples. During BFZ my young son was lucky enough to open 2 of them - traded them for store credit, bought Jace, Vryn's Prodigies and built his first legit standard deck. Bring them back but get them right!

Anonymous

I will resound what has been said. Masterpieces should be done correctly. I agree on the point that there has been so many to date in only 3 sets. 150+ masterpieces in one set is uncalled for in one set. I know that businesses need money. Come on! 1 in a case of MTG! I am not well off enough to cast that kind of net, nor irresponsible to buy 150+ cases to try and get the few Masterpieces I would love to have. I am also a kind of person that finds it difficult to bridge the gap of buying a card for $10 - $15; I would buy a box of that set in which that card comes from before buying the one "Piece of Paper" card. It is a little dizzying at times wondering if WOTC really intends on indirectly describing themselves as greedy. I like your ideas in this video, Full-Art, Full-Art, Full-Art, limited number of cards, and playable value.