Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Do we need nuclear energy to stop climate change? More and more voices from science, environmental activists and the press have been saying so in recent years – but this comes as a shock to those who are fighting against nuclear energy and the problems that come with it. So who is right? Well - it is complicated.

Files

Do we Need Nuclear Energy to Stop Climate Change?

Get Merch designed with ❤ from https://kgs.link/shop-140 Join the Patreon Bird Army 🐧 https://kgs.link/patreon ▼▼ More infos and links are just a click away ▼▼ Sources & further reading: https://sites.google.com/view/sourcesclimatenuclear/ Do we need nuclear energy to stop climate change? More and more voices from science, environmental activists and the press have been saying so in recent years – but this comes as a shock to those who are fighting against nuclear energy and the problems that come with it. So who is right? Well - it is complicated. OUR CHANNELS ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ German Channel: https://kgs.link/youtubeDE Spanish Channel: https://kgs.link/youtubeES HOW CAN YOU SUPPORT US? ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ This is how we make our living and it would be a pleasure if you support us! Get Merch designed with ❤ https://kgs.link/shop-140 Join the Patreon Bird Army 🐧 https://kgs.link/patreon DISCUSSIONS & SOCIAL MEDIA ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ Reddit: https://kgs.link/reddit Instagram: https://kgs.link/instagram Twitter: https://kgs.link/twitter Facebook: https://kgs.link/facebook Discord: https://kgs.link/discord Newsletter: https://kgs.link/newsletter OUR VOICE ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ The Kurzgesagt voice is from Steve Taylor: https://kgs.link/youtube-voice OUR MUSIC ♬♪ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ 700+ minutes of Kurzgesagt Soundtracks by Epic Mountain: Spotify: https://kgs.link/music-spotify Soundcloud: https://kgs.link/music-soundcloud Bandcamp: https://kgs.link/music-bandcamp Youtube: http://kgs.link/music-youtube2021 Facebook: https://kgs.link/music-facebook The Soundtrack of this video: Soundcloud: https://bit.ly/3a4Jfi8 Bandcamp: https://bit.ly/2PNqPvr 🐦🐧🐤 PATREON BIRD ARMY 🐤🐧🐦 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ Many Thanks to our wonderful Patreons who support us every month and made this video possible: Harshul Banthia, Priyadarshi Siddharth, Ethan, Chad, Mason Lagos, Zinovia, BigOlive, Edgar Galan, Lance Liu, Super Luigi Bros Animations, Nicolas Eckert, Drashya Goel, Francois, Seanskios, Alessandro Ticozzi, Cameron McPhail, Ace Sparrow, Russell Stockhammer, o+o, Alec Hogben, Mikolaj Pawlikowski, Alexandra Cheung, SubSonixx, Guillaume VIDAL, Andy Highland, Arina Maria Neculai, Jeremy Engelberg, Josh Lavine, Azreal, Jeremy Clark, Jordi Malaret, Daniel Lo, Kenna Miller, Motin, rayV, Maximo Brito, bque23, Evhen Samchuk, Riyo, Giakeimas, Sunny Bär, Alexander Utz, Gaspard Medina-Creimer, James McClelland, David Nejedlý, George-Cristian Bîrzan, James Ilesley, JP, Ariel Tubbs, Anon, Felicity, Prashanth Samuel, Doop a Derp, Brettyoke49, Oksana Sivchenko, Rene Duedam, Kacey Armbruster, Yu Shing Cheng, osama bin laden's cousin's white best friend, Miko Boulerice, Skyler Martin, Matt Harlow, Arash Amini, Christopher Thomas, João Pinheiro, Raj Patel, Maurizio, panic, Raghav Mahajan, Mate Serdult, Ethan (cathethanoob), Warren Price, Laiton, Drew Johnson, Cole Reid, Daniel Mayor, Vincent Strüh, Gamerbot43, Jonathan Elbaz, matt yang, Nikita Ivanov, Lindsay, David, IsThisRealLife, Sam Wallick, alxpck, Aina Piera Tur, Darius Soo Lum, Happy 1 Year Will Smith

Comments

Forodriac Origamius

Sweden's reactors are now very old and are also being shut down on vague political grounds using outdated environmental arguments. Since a sunset on nuclear power was decided upon in the 70:s, research in nuclear power was forbidden for decades ("the thought ban"). So on the horizon is less nuclear power and no new modern reactors.

Anonymous

Honestly, the fear of nuclear power is overplayed. Diversifying our power sources should be the main priority, so that we are able to remove and replace individual components without affecting the whole system too drastically. Nuclear would be a relatively safe and abundant energy source to tide us over while we figure out how to increase the efficiency levels of our renewable sources and the storage systems we would need to make renewables our primary sources of energy. Nuclear would also buy us valuable time in delaying climate change while we figure THAT problem out as well.

Anonymous

My emotional part is still screaming hell no. My logical part is agreeing more and more with the „it’s not black and white“ approach. But Nuclear power is only save if used right and The pst has shown that’s not always the case. Also nobody wants a possible nuclear fallout zone or end storage near them. What are the radical new approaches there? Do we actually have ideas that go further than „let’s bury it in our backyard and hope future generations will not dig it up“. Again I understand that time is the most crucial part in the climate crisis and without nuclear we won’t nearly have enough but I don’t like how people start jumping on the new cool nuclear train without hesitation because I haven’t heard anything that will help with these questions like endstorage and(to a lesser degree) failsaves. Hopefully someone here knows more. :)

RoseAnne

Airplane travel is the safest way to travel. People are afraid of airplanes because they see that when something goes wrong then it's sometimes pretty catastrophic and gets blown up in the media as well (no pun intended!). Nuclear energy is the exact same. Millions and millions of people have died over the past 150 years from fossil fuels: air pollution kills many people every year, climate change (think more and stronger hurricanes and tornadoes, flooding, drought, etc.), industrial accidents such a coal mine cave ins, etc. etc. But when a rare accident at a nuclear plant happens, the media blows it up. Nuclear energy has by far the best safety record, in the same way that airline travel does.

Anonymous

Very small visual error: the bucket of the bucket wheel excavator at 3:59 is spinning in the wrong direction. See https://youtu.be/DDgvtrQyuPY

Anonymous

I think this was a really fantastic video. Peak Kurzgesagt. Well done.

Anonymous

Is there a way for us to invest in nuclear energy in the USA or other countries?

Anonymous

I have to agree with Trieste; you've portray this discussion as having two sides of the debate, with experts coming down equally in both camps. That smacks of the Climate Change deniers who say there's "proponents of both sides". There's pretty much experts and people who don't know what they're talking about, representing "both sides" as equals isn't helping this discussion. Nuclear has a sorted past, but so does air travel. The limitations we have slapped on nuclear energy is akin to giving up on fireproofing because asbestos was bad.

Dragi Raos

Nuclear is *the* safest energy source, just not the cheapest, even when artificial obstacles erected by fossil fuel lobby are removed.

Dragi Raos

Thankfully, research did go one elsewhere. Otherwise, we would in twenty or thirty years be in panic mode building nuclear power plants from outdated designs left and right with next to no concern for safety.

Dragi Raos

See their video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzfpyo-q-RM - it reinforces the "opinion" part of this one. Birdies don't have chicken brains.

Anonymous

It's not like reactor tech has totally stagnated in the US...what do you think is powering our subs and aircraft carriers? Each carrier has enough juice for a population of about 6,000 crew and pilots AND to run an electric catapult in the new Ford class. The Ford actually has two reactors on board. It seems to me if you want a fast small-plant demo, then you plunk a tried-and-true aircraft carrier style reactor on land somewhere and fire it up. Lots of ex-Navy and DOD civilian techs around to run them, that's for sure. Heck, put it on a ship a few miles offshore and lay a power cable if that makes everyone feel safer. Once proven, maybe size it up a bit or just cluster more in one spot (or in one ship). And then keep cranking out the same design over and over, one area at a time.

Anonymous

I think the risks of nuclear energy need to be further thought through. Yes deaths are low from nuclear accidents but the land mass that is ruined and uninhabitable for a large number of years doesn't appear to be considered. There is also the risk of "nuclear power plants" being converted to an underground nuclear program which could increase the risk of nuclear war which will likely cause even more devastation to the environment and humans than climate change. Japan is considering releasing their reactive water in the ocean because apparently they do not have an alternative. I am not against nuclear power - still probably think it is necessary to provide enough energy while reducing fossil fuel consumption - but I would like the videos to be a bit more balanced. I thought the older videos on this subject were better and I would recommend checking them out.

Anonymous

Was I the only one who noticed the lack of intro video? I missed it greatly, as I’ve come to associate that jingle with a rare spark of brilliance in this world.

Shadmere

Is there a reason that releasing that water is bad? The ocean is very big. Yes, that doesn't mean we can just pollute it to an infinite amount. But it does mean that a relatively tiny amount of radiation is going to be diluted to the point where it will be nigh-undetectable.

Anonymous

Nuclear energy... fossil fuel. I think they r both risky... however our tech has really controlled that

Anonymous

Remember Mickey Mouse in the Sorcerer's Apprentice? This video is well made, but I'm concerned that the producers rely too heavily on technology itself as the only solution. I grew up with TMI and the gas crunch in the 1970's, so my perspective on the nuclear and fossil fuel industries is pretty severe. We keep allowing large corporate and government bureaucracies to spring up between ourselves and our means of existence. And their nature makes them prone to corruption. Both privatize profit, and make the public pay the debts. While we don't have to go back to living in caves, we have to take a hard look at corporate accountability, energy efficiency, advertising, over-consumption and population control. Nuclear power is here to stay, I get that. But while fossil fuel pollution will last for eons, nuclear pollution will poison all life on earth, long after we're gone. I don't believe we can keep going with our current big grid and big city concepts. Just look at Texas. As "hippyish" as it sounds, the Earth itself deserves some respect. It's not just a tool we can turn on and off. Or a dump where we can keep hiding our garbage. I have my list of issues that puts atomic power in a bad light, but that's a fight for another day. I know it's pretty broad topic, but I hope you can make a video that addresses the historic and political origins of our environmental situation.

wozardy

Heyo :) This might not be related directly - but I had the thought that it could be so cool to have a video on the Tzar Bomba, I think it's super interesting and would be very cool to learn about with Kurzgesagt's animated visuals to go with it.

Torben Rudgaard

This video turned me to be pro nuclear power

Kity Bird

oooooooo this is my fav video!